You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@bookkeeper.apache.org by Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com> on 2019/11/20 11:23:26 UTC
Deprecate legacy API ? Which steps ?
Hi,
I think it is time to work in the direction of deprecating the "old" client
API in favour of the new client API.
Blockers:
1) Convert the documentation on the website to use only the new API
2) Let users of the new API use the 'Explicit LAC" feature
for 2) I had sent in January a Pull Request
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1901
I agreed with Sijie that we should think more about the proposal and my
patch was not the best we could do. As it was not a showstopper for me I
stopped the work.
Thoughts ?
Enrico
Re: Deprecate legacy API ? Which steps ?
Posted by Jia Zhai <zh...@gmail.com>.
+1
Best Regards.
Jia Zhai
Beijing, China
Mobile: +86 15810491983
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 6:29 AM Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for deprecating the legacy API.
>
> Sijie
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 3:23 AM Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I think it is time to work in the direction of deprecating the "old"
> client
> > API in favour of the new client API.
> >
> > Blockers:
> > 1) Convert the documentation on the website to use only the new API
> > 2) Let users of the new API use the 'Explicit LAC" feature
> >
> >
> > for 2) I had sent in January a Pull Request
> > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1901
> >
> > I agreed with Sijie that we should think more about the proposal and my
> > patch was not the best we could do. As it was not a showstopper for me I
> > stopped the work.
> >
> > Thoughts ?
> >
> > Enrico
> >
>
Re: Deprecate legacy API ? Which steps ?
Posted by Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>.
+1 for deprecating the legacy API.
Sijie
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 3:23 AM Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I think it is time to work in the direction of deprecating the "old" client
> API in favour of the new client API.
>
> Blockers:
> 1) Convert the documentation on the website to use only the new API
> 2) Let users of the new API use the 'Explicit LAC" feature
>
>
> for 2) I had sent in January a Pull Request
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1901
>
> I agreed with Sijie that we should think more about the proposal and my
> patch was not the best we could do. As it was not a showstopper for me I
> stopped the work.
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> Enrico
>