You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by "Gary Tully (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/07/08 16:40:52 UTC

[jira] Resolved: (AMQ-2542) Tidy up store duplicate suppression from failover recovery - consistent store implementation with help from transportConnection

     [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Gary Tully resolved AMQ-2542.
-----------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

resolved in 961783

Implemented for KahaDB and JDBC.

> Tidy up store duplicate suppression from failover recovery - consistent store implementation with help from transportConnection
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-2542
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2542
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Broker
>    Affects Versions: 5.3.0
>            Reporter: Gary Tully
>            Assignee: Gary Tully
>             Fix For: 5.4.0
>
>
> With failover - with a failure before a reply is received to a send or a transaction commit, the send or transaction will be replayed and will be a duplicate.
> The transportConnector should know that recovery/reconnection has happened and should enforce duplicate suppression based on obtaining the last producer sequence number from the store.
> Currently, duplicate suppression happens at the jdbc message store add, amq store reference store etc... it is not consistent and it is abased on a suitable audit window which may be non deterministic. Would be best to be fully deterministic and consistent (as in a single persistence adapter api)
> To make this perform, a transportConnection needs to be flagged as a reconnect which can precipitate the duplicate suppression, possibly needing a wireformat update. This flag would also help with unmatched acks after failover but maybe that flag can be in an ack...
> This is relevant both when the broker is restarted or when a connection is dropped.
> related issue with relevant test : https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2540

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.