You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@accumulo.apache.org by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> on 2013/10/23 18:54:42 UTC
Table Namespaces
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-802
I noticed that the namespace code that Sean worked on never got finished
and committed. Reading through the above ticket, it looks like we're
fairly close to a minimum acceptable level of functionality for 1.6
(John sums up most of these in the most recent comment).
I'd like to try to get this merged in. What does everyone else think?
Re: Table Namespaces
Posted by Christopher <ct...@apache.org>.
I'd love help getting it ready... I've just rebase'd my GitHub copy of
the ACCUMULO-802 branch (/ctubbsii/accumulo) off of asf/master, if you
want to go off that.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:32 PM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
> I'm concerned about having a partial implementation in 1.6 and then driving
> ourselves crazy trying to fix the API for it in 1.7 because we half assed
> in. In the ticket I think there are 2 items which we need to address before
> bringing it in which would make it awful to fix in future releases do to
> behavior changes. But I don't think they're that bad to fix either.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ah, I didn't go to the issues last week -- didn't realize that 802 was the
>> namespaces.
>>
>> Have we prioritized what needs to be addressed? Can Christopher get 210
>> done?
>>
>> I feel like we're looking a gift horse in the mouth for not getting 802 to
>> a good state, but I also don't want to get in a position where we have to
>> do a huge revert because we find something terrible with it in testing. I
>> don't know.
>>
>>
>> On 10/23/13 10:00 AM, John Vines wrote:
>>
>>> Christopher brought this up in the code freeze thread last week. My stance
>>> is it shouldn't be merged in until the 1.6 necessities get wrapped. I
>>> don't
>>> have the cycles to give it that TLC though.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/****jira/browse/ACCUMULO-802<https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/ACCUMULO-802>
>>>> <https**://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/ACCUMULO-802<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-802>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I noticed that the namespace code that Sean worked on never got finished
>>>> and committed. Reading through the above ticket, it looks like we're
>>>> fairly
>>>> close to a minimum acceptable level of functionality for 1.6 (John sums
>>>> up
>>>> most of these in the most recent comment).
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to try to get this merged in. What does everyone else think?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
Re: Table Namespaces
Posted by John Vines <vi...@apache.org>.
I'm concerned about having a partial implementation in 1.6 and then driving
ourselves crazy trying to fix the API for it in 1.7 because we half assed
in. In the ticket I think there are 2 items which we need to address before
bringing it in which would make it awful to fix in future releases do to
behavior changes. But I don't think they're that bad to fix either.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah, I didn't go to the issues last week -- didn't realize that 802 was the
> namespaces.
>
> Have we prioritized what needs to be addressed? Can Christopher get 210
> done?
>
> I feel like we're looking a gift horse in the mouth for not getting 802 to
> a good state, but I also don't want to get in a position where we have to
> do a huge revert because we find something terrible with it in testing. I
> don't know.
>
>
> On 10/23/13 10:00 AM, John Vines wrote:
>
>> Christopher brought this up in the code freeze thread last week. My stance
>> is it shouldn't be merged in until the 1.6 necessities get wrapped. I
>> don't
>> have the cycles to give it that TLC though.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/****jira/browse/ACCUMULO-802<https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/ACCUMULO-802>
>>> <https**://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/ACCUMULO-802<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-802>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> I noticed that the namespace code that Sean worked on never got finished
>>> and committed. Reading through the above ticket, it looks like we're
>>> fairly
>>> close to a minimum acceptable level of functionality for 1.6 (John sums
>>> up
>>> most of these in the most recent comment).
>>>
>>> I'd like to try to get this merged in. What does everyone else think?
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: Table Namespaces
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
Ah, I didn't go to the issues last week -- didn't realize that 802 was
the namespaces.
Have we prioritized what needs to be addressed? Can Christopher get 210
done?
I feel like we're looking a gift horse in the mouth for not getting 802
to a good state, but I also don't want to get in a position where we
have to do a huge revert because we find something terrible with it in
testing. I don't know.
On 10/23/13 10:00 AM, John Vines wrote:
> Christopher brought this up in the code freeze thread last week. My stance
> is it shouldn't be merged in until the 1.6 necessities get wrapped. I don't
> have the cycles to give it that TLC though.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/ACCUMULO-802<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-802>
>>
>> I noticed that the namespace code that Sean worked on never got finished
>> and committed. Reading through the above ticket, it looks like we're fairly
>> close to a minimum acceptable level of functionality for 1.6 (John sums up
>> most of these in the most recent comment).
>>
>> I'd like to try to get this merged in. What does everyone else think?
>>
>
Re: Table Namespaces
Posted by John Vines <vi...@apache.org>.
Christopher brought this up in the code freeze thread last week. My stance
is it shouldn't be merged in until the 1.6 necessities get wrapped. I don't
have the cycles to give it that TLC though.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/ACCUMULO-802<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-802>
>
> I noticed that the namespace code that Sean worked on never got finished
> and committed. Reading through the above ticket, it looks like we're fairly
> close to a minimum acceptable level of functionality for 1.6 (John sums up
> most of these in the most recent comment).
>
> I'd like to try to get this merged in. What does everyone else think?
>