You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Ruilong Huo <hu...@apache.org> on 2017/07/11 02:30:33 UTC
[RESULT][VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release
Hi IPMC members,
The Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release IPMC vote is now closed and has passed as follows:
[4] +1 (binding) votes
[0] -1 (binding) votes
Overall vote breakdown is as below:
Roman Shaposhnik +1 (non-binding)
John D. Ament +1 (non-binding)
Justin Mclean +1 (binding)
Alan Gates +1 (non-binding)
Thanks everyone for taking the time to review and vote. The Apache HAWQ (incubating) community will proceed with the release.
Best regards,
Ruilong Huo
Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> Also, please note that I did not cast a vote on this release. I agreed
> with Roman's sentiments on needed proper NOTICE/LICENSE/DISCLAIMER for the
> RPMs, but did not get a chance to review the release contents.
Ah sorry I missed that as well, but the vote still passes with 3 +1 votes.
Thanks,
Justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Also, please note that I did not cast a vote on this release. I agreed
with Roman's sentiments on needed proper NOTICE/LICENSE/DISCLAIMER for the
RPMs, but did not get a chance to review the release contents.
John
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 3:48 AM Ruilong Huo <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
> Thanks Julian for the clarification!
>
> Checked that: 1) Roman Shaposhnik; 2) John D. Ament; 3) Justin Mclean; 4)
> Alan Gates, are all PMC member of incubator.
> I have sent another email with their IPMC vote as binding vote for Apache
> HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating release.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Ruilong Huo
>
>
> At 2017-07-11 12:21:13, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> >Ruilong (and others),
> >
> >If in doubt, look people up at https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html <
> https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html>. If a voter’s page has “PMC
> member of … incubator” then their vote is binding.
> >
> >E.g. https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=jmclean <
> https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=jmclean>
> >
> >Julian
> >
> >
> >> On Jul 10, 2017, at 8:50 PM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>> There was only one explicit +1 binding vote from you and others are
> just +1. So I thought they were non-binding vote:)
> >>
> >> In which case (if they were non binding votes) the vote would not of
> passed as you need 3 +1 binding votes and more +1’s than -1’s to pass.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Justin
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >
>
Re:Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release
Posted by Ruilong Huo <hu...@apache.org>.
Thanks Julian for the clarification!
Checked that: 1) Roman Shaposhnik; 2) John D. Ament; 3) Justin Mclean; 4) Alan Gates, are all PMC member of incubator.
I have sent another email with their IPMC vote as binding vote for Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating release.
Best regards,
Ruilong Huo
At 2017-07-11 12:21:13, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>Ruilong (and others),
>
>If in doubt, look people up at https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html <https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html>. If a voter’s page has “PMC member of … incubator” then their vote is binding.
>
>E.g. https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=jmclean <https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=jmclean>
>
>Julian
>
>
>> On Jul 10, 2017, at 8:50 PM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> There was only one explicit +1 binding vote from you and others are just +1. So I thought they were non-binding vote:)
>>
>> In which case (if they were non binding votes) the vote would not of passed as you need 3 +1 binding votes and more +1’s than -1’s to pass.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Justin
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.
Ruilong (and others),
If in doubt, look people up at https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html <https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html>. If a voter’s page has “PMC member of … incubator” then their vote is binding.
E.g. https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=jmclean <https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=jmclean>
Julian
> On Jul 10, 2017, at 8:50 PM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> There was only one explicit +1 binding vote from you and others are just +1. So I thought they were non-binding vote:)
>
> In which case (if they were non binding votes) the vote would not of passed as you need 3 +1 binding votes and more +1’s than -1’s to pass.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> There was only one explicit +1 binding vote from you and others are just +1. So I thought they were non-binding vote:)
In which case (if they were non binding votes) the vote would not of passed as you need 3 +1 binding votes and more +1’s than -1’s to pass.
Thanks,
Justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re:Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release
Posted by HuoRuilong <hu...@163.com>.
Hi Justin,
Thanks Justin! If IPMC vote by default is binding vote, I will correct the announcement.
There was only one explicit +1 binding vote from you and others are just +1. So I thought they were non-binding vote:)
Best regards,
Ruilong Huo
At 2017-07-11 11:06:45, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Overall vote breakdown is as below:
>> Roman Shaposhnik +1 (non-binding)
>> John D. Ament +1 (non-binding)
>> Justin Mclean +1 (binding)
>> Alan Gates +1 (non-binding)
>
>Why are the 3 votes marked as non binding? All 4 people are on the incubator PMC and thus all 4 votes are binding.
>
>Thanks,
>Justin
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> Overall vote breakdown is as below:
> Roman Shaposhnik +1 (non-binding)
> John D. Ament +1 (non-binding)
> Justin Mclean +1 (binding)
> Alan Gates +1 (non-binding)
Why are the 3 votes marked as non binding? All 4 people are on the incubator PMC and thus all 4 votes are binding.
Thanks,
Justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org