You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Mark Miller (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/06/15 18:26:07 UTC
[jira] Assigned: (LUCENE-1650) Small fix in CustomScoreQuery
JavaDoc
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Mark Miller reassigned LUCENE-1650:
-----------------------------------
Assignee: Mark Miller
> Small fix in CustomScoreQuery JavaDoc
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1650
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1650
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Javadocs
> Affects Versions: 2.9, 3.0
> Reporter: Simon Willnauer
> Assignee: Mark Miller
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.9
>
> Attachments: customScoreQuery_CodeChange+JavaDoc.patch, customScoreQuery_JavaDoc.patch
>
>
> I have fixed the javadoc for "Modified Score" formular in CustomScoreQuery. - Patch attached: customScoreQuery_JavaDoc.patch
> I'm quite curious why the method:
> public float customScore(int doc, float subQueryScore, float valSrcScores[])
> calls public float customScore(int doc, float subQueryScore, float valSrcScore]) only in 2 of the 3 cases which makes the choice to override either one of the customScore methods dependent on the number of ValueSourceQuery passed to the constructor. I figure it would be more consistent if it would call the latter in all 3 cases.
> I also attached a patch which proposes a fix for that issue. The patch does also include the JavaDoc issue mentioned above.
> - customScoreQuery_CodeChange+JavaDoc.patch
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org