You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> on 2018/05/13 14:06:44 UTC
Next releases?
Hi guys
Id like to release simple jcache and jwt auth soon.
Anyone against? Any pending todo?
Re: Next releases?
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
jwt-auth and jcache-simple vote sent, will try to add the proxying feature
this afternoon in config
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
Le mer. 16 mai 2018 à 08:40, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> a écrit :
> In general I'd say that we should support it.
> If people make dumb things they are to blame themselves.
> Otw it makes sense to support proxies - and if it's only in hindsight of
> serialisability!
>
> This whole paragraph in the spec is basically infantilising our users.
> Of course we should probably point them out to the request behaviour, but
> that could be in an errata or a hint section as well.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> > Am 16.05.2018 um 07:41 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
> >:
> >
> > for jwt-auth we need the tck 1.1 (no release yet)
> > do we drop tck to release - ensuring it passes before?
> >
> > For reference https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile-jwt-auth/issues/88
> >
> > @Mark: for config, do you think we can support proxies implicitly? If
> there is an interface with @ConfigProperty then we create a proxy for it?
> Would miss @Configuration but allow to use that pattern already for
> startup-config only? wdyt? This is my only blocker to use mp-config and i
> can manage almost all other features in a custom source easily.
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book
> >
> >
> > Le lun. 14 mai 2018 à 10:43, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> a écrit :
> > +1
> >
> > I'd also like to push a new config release.
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> > > Am 13.05.2018 um 16:06 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibucau@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > Hi guys
> > >
> > > Id like to release simple jcache and jwt auth soon.
> > >
> > > Anyone against? Any pending todo?
> > >
> >
>
>
Re: Next releases?
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
In general I'd say that we should support it.
If people make dumb things they are to blame themselves.
Otw it makes sense to support proxies - and if it's only in hindsight of serialisability!
This whole paragraph in the spec is basically infantilising our users.
Of course we should probably point them out to the request behaviour, but that could be in an errata or a hint section as well.
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 16.05.2018 um 07:41 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>
> for jwt-auth we need the tck 1.1 (no release yet)
> do we drop tck to release - ensuring it passes before?
>
> For reference https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile-jwt-auth/issues/88
>
> @Mark: for config, do you think we can support proxies implicitly? If there is an interface with @ConfigProperty then we create a proxy for it? Would miss @Configuration but allow to use that pattern already for startup-config only? wdyt? This is my only blocker to use mp-config and i can manage almost all other features in a custom source easily.
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book
>
>
> Le lun. 14 mai 2018 à 10:43, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> a écrit :
> +1
>
> I'd also like to push a new config release.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 13.05.2018 um 16:06 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Hi guys
> >
> > Id like to release simple jcache and jwt auth soon.
> >
> > Anyone against? Any pending todo?
> >
>
Re: Next releases?
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
for jwt-auth we need the tck 1.1 (no release yet)
do we drop tck to release - ensuring it passes before?
For reference https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile-jwt-auth/issues/88
@Mark: for config, do you think we can support proxies implicitly? If there
is an interface with @ConfigProperty then we create a proxy for it? Would
miss @Configuration but allow to use that pattern already for
startup-config only? wdyt? This is my only blocker to use mp-config and i
can manage almost all other features in a custom source easily.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
Le lun. 14 mai 2018 à 10:43, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> a écrit :
> +1
>
> I'd also like to push a new config release.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 13.05.2018 um 16:06 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
> >:
> >
> > Hi guys
> >
> > Id like to release simple jcache and jwt auth soon.
> >
> > Anyone against? Any pending todo?
> >
>
>
Re: Next releases?
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
+1
I'd also like to push a new config release.
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 13.05.2018 um 16:06 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi guys
>
> Id like to release simple jcache and jwt auth soon.
>
> Anyone against? Any pending todo?
>