You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@beam.apache.org by Siddharth Aryan <si...@gmail.com> on 2023/03/25 03:52:30 UTC
Regarding Project proposal review and feedback
Hello ,
I am Siddharth Aryan a undergrad and I am looking forward to someone who
can help me reviewing my proposal and give me a feedback on the them which
help me to create a good proposal.
Here ,I am attaching my both the project proposals:
>Sentimental Analysis Pipeline with the help of Machine Learnig:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U6zcXAWsDCrWlbf14f5VlLqPZFucwXR48tD7mrERW-g/edit?usp=sharing
>Integrating Apache Beam with Flink Datastream API:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sQEe9eVuoHX9QWS9Zj5wVl7MLmfk7QO09pjZOsk-TFY/edit?usp=sharing
Best Regards
Siddharth Aryan
Github :https://github.com/nervoussidd
Re: Regarding Project proposal review and feedback
Posted by Siddharth Aryan <si...@gmail.com>.
Hello David,
First of all thanks for the reply .Now answering your question I would like
to state that Yes, I am aware that there is an existing Flink runner based
on the DataStream and Operator API in the Beam codebase. However, the
runner I propose to develop will differ from the existing one in a few
significant ways.
Firstly, the existing runner uses Flink's lower-level Operator API, which
provides more control over the execution of the pipeline but requires more
manual configuration. In contrast, the runner I propose to develop will use
Flink's higher-level DataStream API, which provides a more user-friendly
and streamlined way to define streaming data processing pipelines. This
will make it easier for Beam users to write and execute streaming pipelines
using Flink.
Secondly, the existing runner does not support Beam's windowing and
triggering semantics in the Flink DataStream API, which can be a
significant limitation for users who want to take advantage of these
features. In contrast, the runner I propose to develop will provide support
for these features, enabling Beam users to write streaming pipelines that
use Beam's windowing and triggering semantics and execute them on the Flink
streaming runtime.
Overall, the runner I propose to develop will provide a more user-friendly
and feature-rich integration between Beam and Flink, making it easier for
Beam users to take advantage of Flink's high-performance capabilities for
data processing.
Hope you have found all the answers in the above lines.
Best Regards,
Siddharth Aryan.
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023, 1:39 PM Jeff Zhang <zj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Same question as David, one idea in my mind is to integrate the beam sql
> api with flink table api, this does not exist in the current flink runner.
>
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 3:46 PM David Morávek <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Siddharth,
>>
>> Thanks for your interest in the Flink Runner for Beam. Reading through
>> the project, one thing that immediately strikes me is that there already is
>> a Flink runner based on DataStream and Operator (one level below
>> DataStream) API in the code base. Are you aware of this? If yes, how does
>> the runner you want to introduce differ from the existing one?
>>
>> Best,
>> D.
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 9:41 PM Svetak Sundhar via dev <
>> dev@beam.apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Siddharth,
>>> I left some comments as well on the sentiment analysis proposal.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>> Svetak Sundhar
>>>
>>> Technical Solutions Engineer, Data
>>> s <ne...@google.com>vetaksundhar@google.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 1:58 PM Anand Inguva via dev <de...@beam.apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I left some comments on the sentiment analysis proposal.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Anand
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 9:59 AM Danny McCormick via dev <
>>>> dev@beam.apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Siddharth! I left some comments on the sentiment analysis
>>>>> proposal, I am probably not the best person to comment on the flink
>>>>> datastream api one though.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Danny
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 11:53 PM Siddharth Aryan <
>>>>> siddhartharyan689@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello ,
>>>>>> I am Siddharth Aryan a undergrad and I am looking forward to someone
>>>>>> who can help me reviewing my proposal and give me a feedback on the them
>>>>>> which help me to create a good proposal.
>>>>>> Here ,I am attaching my both the project proposals:
>>>>>> >Sentimental Analysis Pipeline with the help of Machine Learnig:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U6zcXAWsDCrWlbf14f5VlLqPZFucwXR48tD7mrERW-g/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >Integrating Apache Beam with Flink Datastream API:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sQEe9eVuoHX9QWS9Zj5wVl7MLmfk7QO09pjZOsk-TFY/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>>> Siddharth Aryan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Github :https://github.com/nervoussidd
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>
> --
> Best Regards
>
> Jeff Zhang
>
Re: Regarding Project proposal review and feedback
Posted by Kenneth Knowles <ke...@apache.org>.
>
> Unless there is a good reason, we should not introduce another Flink
> runner into the Beam codebase. The current one, which is very advanced
> feature-wise (it took years to get there), already has a need for more
> maintainers. If you see weak spots in the current implementation, would you
> consider improving the existing runner instead of trying to write a new one
> from scratch?
>
Agree that we should not introduce a new runner. It would be great to
propose and implement improvements to the current runner. The current
runner does have a pretty complete implementation of the Beam Model
including windowing and triggers.
> (this might be a bit outdated, please correct me if I'm wrong) AFAIK Beam
> SQL is just a DSL over Beam's low-level APIs. This makes introducing new
> runners fairly straightforward because you only need to support a few
> primitive transformations to have a fully working runner (even though it
> might not be optimal performance-wise); everything else is just built on
> top of those. This prevents us from directly translating Beam SQL into
> Flink SQL / Flink Table API (you always need to go through Beam's low-level
> API).
>
One correction: your description of Beam SQL is correct, but the last part
is not. The Beam Model is set up so that any composite transform or any
piece of a graph can be executed in a smart way. All of our runners do this
somewhat, for example lifting combiners before shuffles and
fusion/chaining. You can always throw away a subgraph and do it "your own
way" as long as you match the semantics. You could definitely take a Beam
SqlTransform and implement it directly using Flink SQL or Flink's table
API, as long as you made the behavior match exactly.
Kenn
>
> Best,
> D.
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 11:29 AM Siddharth Aryan <
> siddhartharyan689@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello Jeff,
>> Thank you for the idea, as it will allow beam users to write sql
>> queries using the Beam SQL API and execute them on the Flink Table API.I
>> will look into it later as my current focus is to implement an integration
>> between Apache Beam and the Flink DataStream API. While the existing Flink
>> runner is based on DataStream and Operator API, my project aims to create a
>> new runner that specifically utilizes the Flink DataStream API.
>> And thanks for the feedback.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Siddharth Aryan
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 1:39 PM Jeff Zhang <zj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Same question as David, one idea in my mind is to integrate the beam
>>> sql api with flink table api, this does not exist in the current flink
>>> runner.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 3:46 PM David Morávek <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Siddharth,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your interest in the Flink Runner for Beam. Reading through
>>>> the project, one thing that immediately strikes me is that there already is
>>>> a Flink runner based on DataStream and Operator (one level below
>>>> DataStream) API in the code base. Are you aware of this? If yes, how does
>>>> the runner you want to introduce differ from the existing one?
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> D.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 9:41 PM Svetak Sundhar via dev <
>>>> dev@beam.apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Siddharth,
>>>>> I left some comments as well on the sentiment analysis proposal.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Svetak Sundhar
>>>>>
>>>>> Technical Solutions Engineer, Data
>>>>> s <ne...@google.com>vetaksundhar@google.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 1:58 PM Anand Inguva via dev <
>>>>> dev@beam.apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I left some comments on the sentiment analysis proposal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Anand
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 9:59 AM Danny McCormick via dev <
>>>>>> dev@beam.apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks Siddharth! I left some comments on the sentiment analysis
>>>>>>> proposal, I am probably not the best person to comment on the flink
>>>>>>> datastream api one though.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Danny
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 11:53 PM Siddharth Aryan <
>>>>>>> siddhartharyan689@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello ,
>>>>>>>> I am Siddharth Aryan a undergrad and I am looking forward to
>>>>>>>> someone who can help me reviewing my proposal and give me a feedback on the
>>>>>>>> them which help me to create a good proposal.
>>>>>>>> Here ,I am attaching my both the project proposals:
>>>>>>>> >Sentimental Analysis Pipeline with the help of Machine Learnig:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U6zcXAWsDCrWlbf14f5VlLqPZFucwXR48tD7mrERW-g/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >Integrating Apache Beam with Flink Datastream API:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sQEe9eVuoHX9QWS9Zj5wVl7MLmfk7QO09pjZOsk-TFY/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>>>>> Siddharth Aryan
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Github :https://github.com/nervoussidd
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards
>>>
>>> Jeff Zhang
>>>
>>
Re: Regarding Project proposal review and feedback
Posted by David Morávek <dm...@apache.org>.
@Siddharth
> Secondly, the existing runner does not support Beam's windowing and
> triggering semantics in the Flink DataStream API
Can you please expand on this? AFAIK the current Flink runner is feature
complete w.r.t. windowing support.
which provides more control over the execution of the pipeline but requires
> more manual configuration
>
What manual configuration are you referring to? The user should be
completely abstracted away from the Flink APIs. If this is not the case,
it's something to be fixed.
@Jeff
one idea in my mind is to integrate the beam sql api with flink table api
>
(this might be a bit outdated, please correct me if I'm wrong) AFAIK Beam
SQL is just a DSL over Beam's low-level APIs. This makes introducing new
runners fairly straightforward because you only need to support a few
primitive transformations to have a fully working runner (even though it
might not be optimal performance-wise); everything else is just built on
top of those. This prevents us from directly translating Beam SQL into
Flink SQL / Flink Table API (you always need to go through Beam's low-level
API).
Unless there is a good reason, we should not introduce another Flink runner
into the Beam codebase. The current one, which is very advanced
feature-wise (it took years to get there), already has a need for more
maintainers. If you see weak spots in the current implementation, would you
consider improving the existing runner instead of trying to write a new one
from scratch?
Best,
D.
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 11:29 AM Siddharth Aryan <
siddhartharyan689@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Jeff,
> Thank you for the idea, as it will allow beam users to write sql
> queries using the Beam SQL API and execute them on the Flink Table API.I
> will look into it later as my current focus is to implement an integration
> between Apache Beam and the Flink DataStream API. While the existing Flink
> runner is based on DataStream and Operator API, my project aims to create a
> new runner that specifically utilizes the Flink DataStream API.
> And thanks for the feedback.
>
> Best Regards,
> Siddharth Aryan
>
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 1:39 PM Jeff Zhang <zj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Same question as David, one idea in my mind is to integrate the beam sql
>> api with flink table api, this does not exist in the current flink runner.
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 3:46 PM David Morávek <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Siddharth,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your interest in the Flink Runner for Beam. Reading through
>>> the project, one thing that immediately strikes me is that there already is
>>> a Flink runner based on DataStream and Operator (one level below
>>> DataStream) API in the code base. Are you aware of this? If yes, how does
>>> the runner you want to introduce differ from the existing one?
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> D.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 9:41 PM Svetak Sundhar via dev <
>>> dev@beam.apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Siddharth,
>>>> I left some comments as well on the sentiment analysis proposal.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Svetak Sundhar
>>>>
>>>> Technical Solutions Engineer, Data
>>>> s <ne...@google.com>vetaksundhar@google.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 1:58 PM Anand Inguva via dev <
>>>> dev@beam.apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I left some comments on the sentiment analysis proposal.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Anand
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 9:59 AM Danny McCormick via dev <
>>>>> dev@beam.apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks Siddharth! I left some comments on the sentiment analysis
>>>>>> proposal, I am probably not the best person to comment on the flink
>>>>>> datastream api one though.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Danny
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 11:53 PM Siddharth Aryan <
>>>>>> siddhartharyan689@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello ,
>>>>>>> I am Siddharth Aryan a undergrad and I am looking forward to someone
>>>>>>> who can help me reviewing my proposal and give me a feedback on the them
>>>>>>> which help me to create a good proposal.
>>>>>>> Here ,I am attaching my both the project proposals:
>>>>>>> >Sentimental Analysis Pipeline with the help of Machine Learnig:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U6zcXAWsDCrWlbf14f5VlLqPZFucwXR48tD7mrERW-g/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >Integrating Apache Beam with Flink Datastream API:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sQEe9eVuoHX9QWS9Zj5wVl7MLmfk7QO09pjZOsk-TFY/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>>>> Siddharth Aryan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Github :https://github.com/nervoussidd
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Jeff Zhang
>>
>
Re: Regarding Project proposal review and feedback
Posted by Siddharth Aryan <si...@gmail.com>.
Hello Jeff,
Thank you for the idea, as it will allow beam users to write sql
queries using the Beam SQL API and execute them on the Flink Table API.I
will look into it later as my current focus is to implement an integration
between Apache Beam and the Flink DataStream API. While the existing Flink
runner is based on DataStream and Operator API, my project aims to create a
new runner that specifically utilizes the Flink DataStream API.
And thanks for the feedback.
Best Regards,
Siddharth Aryan
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 1:39 PM Jeff Zhang <zj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Same question as David, one idea in my mind is to integrate the beam sql
> api with flink table api, this does not exist in the current flink runner.
>
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 3:46 PM David Morávek <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Siddharth,
>>
>> Thanks for your interest in the Flink Runner for Beam. Reading through
>> the project, one thing that immediately strikes me is that there already is
>> a Flink runner based on DataStream and Operator (one level below
>> DataStream) API in the code base. Are you aware of this? If yes, how does
>> the runner you want to introduce differ from the existing one?
>>
>> Best,
>> D.
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 9:41 PM Svetak Sundhar via dev <
>> dev@beam.apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Siddharth,
>>> I left some comments as well on the sentiment analysis proposal.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>> Svetak Sundhar
>>>
>>> Technical Solutions Engineer, Data
>>> s <ne...@google.com>vetaksundhar@google.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 1:58 PM Anand Inguva via dev <de...@beam.apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I left some comments on the sentiment analysis proposal.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Anand
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 9:59 AM Danny McCormick via dev <
>>>> dev@beam.apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Siddharth! I left some comments on the sentiment analysis
>>>>> proposal, I am probably not the best person to comment on the flink
>>>>> datastream api one though.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Danny
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 11:53 PM Siddharth Aryan <
>>>>> siddhartharyan689@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello ,
>>>>>> I am Siddharth Aryan a undergrad and I am looking forward to someone
>>>>>> who can help me reviewing my proposal and give me a feedback on the them
>>>>>> which help me to create a good proposal.
>>>>>> Here ,I am attaching my both the project proposals:
>>>>>> >Sentimental Analysis Pipeline with the help of Machine Learnig:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U6zcXAWsDCrWlbf14f5VlLqPZFucwXR48tD7mrERW-g/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >Integrating Apache Beam with Flink Datastream API:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sQEe9eVuoHX9QWS9Zj5wVl7MLmfk7QO09pjZOsk-TFY/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>>> Siddharth Aryan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Github :https://github.com/nervoussidd
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>
> --
> Best Regards
>
> Jeff Zhang
>
Re: Regarding Project proposal review and feedback
Posted by Jeff Zhang <zj...@gmail.com>.
Same question as David, one idea in my mind is to integrate the beam sql
api with flink table api, this does not exist in the current flink runner.
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 3:46 PM David Morávek <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Siddharth,
>
> Thanks for your interest in the Flink Runner for Beam. Reading through the
> project, one thing that immediately strikes me is that there already is a
> Flink runner based on DataStream and Operator (one level below DataStream)
> API in the code base. Are you aware of this? If yes, how does the runner
> you want to introduce differ from the existing one?
>
> Best,
> D.
>
> On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 9:41 PM Svetak Sundhar via dev <de...@beam.apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Siddharth,
>> I left some comments as well on the sentiment analysis proposal.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> Svetak Sundhar
>>
>> Technical Solutions Engineer, Data
>> s <ne...@google.com>vetaksundhar@google.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 1:58 PM Anand Inguva via dev <de...@beam.apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I left some comments on the sentiment analysis proposal.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Anand
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 9:59 AM Danny McCormick via dev <
>>> dev@beam.apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Siddharth! I left some comments on the sentiment analysis
>>>> proposal, I am probably not the best person to comment on the flink
>>>> datastream api one though.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Danny
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 11:53 PM Siddharth Aryan <
>>>> siddhartharyan689@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello ,
>>>>> I am Siddharth Aryan a undergrad and I am looking forward to someone
>>>>> who can help me reviewing my proposal and give me a feedback on the them
>>>>> which help me to create a good proposal.
>>>>> Here ,I am attaching my both the project proposals:
>>>>> >Sentimental Analysis Pipeline with the help of Machine Learnig:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U6zcXAWsDCrWlbf14f5VlLqPZFucwXR48tD7mrERW-g/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>
>>>>> >Integrating Apache Beam with Flink Datastream API:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sQEe9eVuoHX9QWS9Zj5wVl7MLmfk7QO09pjZOsk-TFY/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>
>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>> Siddharth Aryan
>>>>>
>>>>> Github :https://github.com/nervoussidd
>>>>>
>>>>
--
Best Regards
Jeff Zhang
Re: Regarding Project proposal review and feedback
Posted by David Morávek <dm...@apache.org>.
Hi Siddharth,
Thanks for your interest in the Flink Runner for Beam. Reading through the
project, one thing that immediately strikes me is that there already is a
Flink runner based on DataStream and Operator (one level below DataStream)
API in the code base. Are you aware of this? If yes, how does the runner
you want to introduce differ from the existing one?
Best,
D.
On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 9:41 PM Svetak Sundhar via dev <de...@beam.apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi Siddharth,
> I left some comments as well on the sentiment analysis proposal.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Svetak Sundhar
>
> Technical Solutions Engineer, Data
> s <ne...@google.com>vetaksundhar@google.com
>
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 1:58 PM Anand Inguva via dev <de...@beam.apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> I left some comments on the sentiment analysis proposal.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Anand
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 9:59 AM Danny McCormick via dev <
>> dev@beam.apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Siddharth! I left some comments on the sentiment analysis
>>> proposal, I am probably not the best person to comment on the flink
>>> datastream api one though.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Danny
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 11:53 PM Siddharth Aryan <
>>> siddhartharyan689@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello ,
>>>> I am Siddharth Aryan a undergrad and I am looking forward to someone
>>>> who can help me reviewing my proposal and give me a feedback on the them
>>>> which help me to create a good proposal.
>>>> Here ,I am attaching my both the project proposals:
>>>> >Sentimental Analysis Pipeline with the help of Machine Learnig:
>>>>
>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U6zcXAWsDCrWlbf14f5VlLqPZFucwXR48tD7mrERW-g/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>
>>>> >Integrating Apache Beam with Flink Datastream API:
>>>>
>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sQEe9eVuoHX9QWS9Zj5wVl7MLmfk7QO09pjZOsk-TFY/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards
>>>> Siddharth Aryan
>>>>
>>>> Github :https://github.com/nervoussidd
>>>>
>>>
Re: Regarding Project proposal review and feedback
Posted by Svetak Sundhar via dev <de...@beam.apache.org>.
Hi Siddharth,
I left some comments as well on the sentiment analysis proposal.
Thanks,
Svetak Sundhar
Technical Solutions Engineer, Data
s <ne...@google.com>vetaksundhar@google.com
On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 1:58 PM Anand Inguva via dev <de...@beam.apache.org>
wrote:
> I left some comments on the sentiment analysis proposal.
>
> Thanks,
> Anand
>
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 9:59 AM Danny McCormick via dev <
> dev@beam.apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Siddharth! I left some comments on the sentiment analysis
>> proposal, I am probably not the best person to comment on the flink
>> datastream api one though.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Danny
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 11:53 PM Siddharth Aryan <
>> siddhartharyan689@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello ,
>>> I am Siddharth Aryan a undergrad and I am looking forward to someone who
>>> can help me reviewing my proposal and give me a feedback on the them which
>>> help me to create a good proposal.
>>> Here ,I am attaching my both the project proposals:
>>> >Sentimental Analysis Pipeline with the help of Machine Learnig:
>>>
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U6zcXAWsDCrWlbf14f5VlLqPZFucwXR48tD7mrERW-g/edit?usp=sharing
>>>
>>> >Integrating Apache Beam with Flink Datastream API:
>>>
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sQEe9eVuoHX9QWS9Zj5wVl7MLmfk7QO09pjZOsk-TFY/edit?usp=sharing
>>>
>>> Best Regards
>>> Siddharth Aryan
>>>
>>> Github :https://github.com/nervoussidd
>>>
>>
Re: Regarding Project proposal review and feedback
Posted by Anand Inguva via dev <de...@beam.apache.org>.
I left some comments on the sentiment analysis proposal.
Thanks,
Anand
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 9:59 AM Danny McCormick via dev <de...@beam.apache.org>
wrote:
> Thanks Siddharth! I left some comments on the sentiment analysis proposal,
> I am probably not the best person to comment on the flink datastream api
> one though.
>
> Thanks,
> Danny
>
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 11:53 PM Siddharth Aryan <
> siddhartharyan689@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello ,
>> I am Siddharth Aryan a undergrad and I am looking forward to someone who
>> can help me reviewing my proposal and give me a feedback on the them which
>> help me to create a good proposal.
>> Here ,I am attaching my both the project proposals:
>> >Sentimental Analysis Pipeline with the help of Machine Learnig:
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U6zcXAWsDCrWlbf14f5VlLqPZFucwXR48tD7mrERW-g/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>> >Integrating Apache Beam with Flink Datastream API:
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sQEe9eVuoHX9QWS9Zj5wVl7MLmfk7QO09pjZOsk-TFY/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Siddharth Aryan
>>
>> Github :https://github.com/nervoussidd
>>
>
Re: Regarding Project proposal review and feedback
Posted by Danny McCormick via dev <de...@beam.apache.org>.
Thanks Siddharth! I left some comments on the sentiment analysis proposal,
I am probably not the best person to comment on the flink datastream api
one though.
Thanks,
Danny
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 11:53 PM Siddharth Aryan <
siddhartharyan689@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello ,
> I am Siddharth Aryan a undergrad and I am looking forward to someone who
> can help me reviewing my proposal and give me a feedback on the them which
> help me to create a good proposal.
> Here ,I am attaching my both the project proposals:
> >Sentimental Analysis Pipeline with the help of Machine Learnig:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U6zcXAWsDCrWlbf14f5VlLqPZFucwXR48tD7mrERW-g/edit?usp=sharing
>
> >Integrating Apache Beam with Flink Datastream API:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sQEe9eVuoHX9QWS9Zj5wVl7MLmfk7QO09pjZOsk-TFY/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Best Regards
> Siddharth Aryan
>
> Github :https://github.com/nervoussidd
>