xml-fop BUILD SUCCESSFUL

[Clay Leeds <cl...@medata.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

FYI, I just made this post on the forrest mailing list[1]. It details 
that I made had a BUILD SUCCESSFUL with a /forrest/ run on xml-fop/. 
:-D

There are still things left to do before I COMMIT changes (decide 
whether or not to wait 'til forrest-0.6, new 'css-style'-based skin or 
use current forrest-site skin, javadocs/forrestdoc, updated Apache 7 
FOP logos with white background etc.)...

We also have this issue[2] to trouble-shoot (although it may Just Go 
Away(tm) when I COMMIT the changes...).

But we're very close!

Web Maestro Clay

[1]
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=forrest-dev&m=109164163814660&w=2
[2]
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-dev&m=109119692423479&w=2

Web Maestro Clay <cl...@medata.com>
- ---
There are only 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand 
binary and those who don't.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAkERI0MACgkQRixs4Cbu7ehyvQCdG1RLRSUq95vGEAg7yjEgvY6U
G9gAnjNv9eeMkM6QEnyztAv45XK8M4D0
=9a+N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: xml-fop BUILD SUCCESSFUL

[Clay Leeds <cl...@medata.com>]

On Aug 4, 2004, at 4:38 PM, Glen Mazza wrote:
> --- Clay Leeds <cl...@medata.com> wrote:
>> FYI, I just made this post on the forrest mailing
>> list[1]. It details
>> that I made had a BUILD SUCCESSFUL with a /forrest/
>> run on xml-fop/.
>> :-D
>
> Great!  You've had it tough for the past few months
> here.  Before you came on board it used to be
> easy--just go to Forrestbot and hit the "publish"
> button.  (At least Forrestbot being broken has
> increased your Forrest skills.)

Yeah... And the switch over from multiple individual/per-directory 
'book.xml' files all over the place to using the default (sweet!) 
sitemap.xmap file helps as well. Unfortuantely, for the time being 
I'm/we're going to have to *manually* generate the 'example' PDFs 
(those referenced under examples.html & dev/svg.html). I think the old 
xml-fop site was based on forrest-0.4 (it worked under 0.5 to some 
degree, but there were problems). I think things will be simpler now...

>> There are still things left to do before I COMMIT
>> changes (decide
>> whether or not to wait 'til forrest-0.6, new
>> 'css-style'-based skin or
>> use current forrest-site skin, javadocs/forrestdoc,
>> updated Apache 7
>> FOP logos with white background etc.)...
>
> Use your best judgment.  We may also be able to reduce
> some of the web pages--perhaps in terms of comparing
> the site design pages vs. the new Docbook stuff Simon
> committed, to see if any of the former can be removed.
>  I'll try to help out sometime in this regard.

I will. My hope is to get us moved to the white, because it's cleaner, 
and easier to read (IMHO). Whether we'll wait or not depends on how 
impatient we are. The fact that we can do vi updates if possible is 
nice... I just need to go back and make certain forrestdoc doesn't 
somehow clobber the updates...

> Thanks,
> Glen

Looking forward to making some real progress...

Web Maestro Clay

Re: xml-fop BUILD SUCCESSFUL

[Glen Mazza <gr...@yahoo.com>]

--- Clay Leeds <cl...@medata.com> wrote:
> FYI, I just made this post on the forrest mailing
> list[1]. It details 
> that I made had a BUILD SUCCESSFUL with a /forrest/
> run on xml-fop/. 
> :-D
> 

Great!  You've had it tough for the past few months
here.  Before you came on board it used to be
easy--just go to Forrestbot and hit the "publish"
button.  (At least Forrestbot being broken has
increased your Forrest skills.)

> There are still things left to do before I COMMIT
> changes (decide 
> whether or not to wait 'til forrest-0.6, new
> 'css-style'-based skin or 
> use current forrest-site skin, javadocs/forrestdoc,
> updated Apache 7 
> FOP logos with white background etc.)...
> 

Use your best judgment.  We may also be able to reduce
some of the web pages--perhaps in terms of comparing
the site design pages vs. the new Docbook stuff Simon
committed, to see if any of the former can be removed.
 I'll try to help out sometime in this regard.  

Thanks,
Glen