You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@oozie.apache.org by "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/09/27 18:52:02 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-1557)
TestFsActionExecutor.testChmodWithGlob fails against Hadoop 2.1.x-beta
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13780085#comment-13780085 ]
Alejandro Abdelnur commented on OOZIE-1557:
-------------------------------------------
+1
> TestFsActionExecutor.testChmodWithGlob fails against Hadoop 2.1.x-beta
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-1557
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1557
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: tests
> Affects Versions: trunk, 4.0.1
> Reporter: Robert Kanter
> Assignee: Robert Kanter
> Attachments: OOZIE-1557.patch
>
>
> When running against Hadoop 2.1.x-beta, {{TestFsActionExecutor.testChmodWithGlob}} fails because of an incompatible change introduced by HDFS-4659 with how file permissions are set.
> {noformat}
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Test set: org.apache.oozie.action.hadoop.TestFsActionExecutor
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Tests run: 24, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 35.813 sec <<< FAILURE!
> testChmodWithGlob(org.apache.oozie.action.hadoop.TestFsActionExecutor) Time elapsed: 0.002 sec <<< FAILURE!
> junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: expected:<rw[-]------> but was:<rw[x]------>
> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:85)
> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:91)
> at org.apache.oozie.action.hadoop.TestFsActionExecutor.testChmodWithGlob(TestFsActionExecutor.java:468)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:168)
> at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:134)
> at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:110)
> at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:128)
> at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:113)
> at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:124)
> at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:243)
> at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:238)
> at org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit38ClassRunner.run(JUnit38ClassRunner.java:83)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.ClassDemarcatingRunner.run(ClassDemarcatingRunner.java:58)
> at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:128)
> at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:24)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:231)
> at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:439)
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303)
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:895)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:918)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:680)
> {noformat}
> As this behavior is different between Hadoop 1 and 2, I think we should simply have the test not check for this case.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira