You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org by Roberto Nunnari <ro...@supsi.ch> on 2006/10/09 09:37:13 UTC

Re: fop in a servlet in 0.91beta very different from 0.20.5

Hello list.


Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> On 10.02.2006 20:14:06 Roberto Nunnari wrote:
>> Hello Jeremias.
>>
>> Yes. You're right. There was a problem with the FO document..
>> in effect it was the same as the one I had a week ago caused
>> by the title element.
>>
>> Anyways, I managed to move from 0.20.5 to 0.91beta and have it
>> generate correctly the pdf.
>>
>> The only problem was with the trick I had used in 0.20.5
>> with the last marker so that the last page would not have the
>> subtotal on the last page. The difference:
>> - 0.20.5: <marker marker-class-name="subtotalvalue"></marker>
>> - 0.91beta: <marker marker-class-name="subtotalvalue"> </marker>
>>
>> as you see, the only difference is that in 0.91beta a space
>> is necessary to have fop use an empty string on the last page
>> instead of the last non empty marker.
>>
>> Also, 0.91beta correctly renders the subtotal in bold while
>> 0.20.5 doesn't.
>>
>> Ok. Next week I'll deploy 0.91beta in the production environment
>> and if all will be well, after a couple of weeks I'll report
>> here.
> 
> Thanks for the feedback.

ok.. a bit late, but here I am:
I'm happy to say that the system has been online for 8 months
now and I've had no problem reports since. FOP rocks!

Thank you all for the great work guys!


> 
>> Just one more question:
>> I need be sure a small table will be shown all on the same page
>> and not split across two pages.. What is the best way to go
>> with 0.91beta ? Is it possible to achive that using several table-row
>> or should I use put all content in a single table-row?
> 
> You can use multiple table-rows and keep-together.within-page="always"
> on the fo:table. (works only in 0.91beta and later)
> 
> <snip/>
> 
> Jeremias Maerki
> 



-- 
Robi


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org


Re: fop in a servlet in 0.91beta very different from 0.20.5

Posted by Jeremias Maerki <de...@jeremias-maerki.ch>.
Better late than never. :-) Thanks so much for your feedback! It's
always good to hear stuff like that.

On 09.10.2006 09:37:13 Roberto Nunnari wrote:
> Hello list.
> 
> 
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > On 10.02.2006 20:14:06 Roberto Nunnari wrote:
> >> Hello Jeremias.
> >>
> >> Yes. You're right. There was a problem with the FO document..
> >> in effect it was the same as the one I had a week ago caused
> >> by the title element.
> >>
> >> Anyways, I managed to move from 0.20.5 to 0.91beta and have it
> >> generate correctly the pdf.
> >>
> >> The only problem was with the trick I had used in 0.20.5
> >> with the last marker so that the last page would not have the
> >> subtotal on the last page. The difference:
> >> - 0.20.5: <marker marker-class-name="subtotalvalue"></marker>
> >> - 0.91beta: <marker marker-class-name="subtotalvalue"> </marker>
> >>
> >> as you see, the only difference is that in 0.91beta a space
> >> is necessary to have fop use an empty string on the last page
> >> instead of the last non empty marker.
> >>
> >> Also, 0.91beta correctly renders the subtotal in bold while
> >> 0.20.5 doesn't.
> >>
> >> Ok. Next week I'll deploy 0.91beta in the production environment
> >> and if all will be well, after a couple of weeks I'll report
> >> here.
> > 
> > Thanks for the feedback.
> 
> ok.. a bit late, but here I am:
> I'm happy to say that the system has been online for 8 months
> now and I've had no problem reports since. FOP rocks!
> 
> Thank you all for the great work guys!
> 
> 
> > 
> >> Just one more question:
> >> I need be sure a small table will be shown all on the same page
> >> and not split across two pages.. What is the best way to go
> >> with 0.91beta ? Is it possible to achive that using several table-row
> >> or should I use put all content in a single table-row?
> > 
> > You can use multiple table-rows and keep-together.within-page="always"
> > on the fo:table. (works only in 0.91beta and later)
> > 
> > <snip/>
> > 
> > Jeremias Maerki
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Robi


Jeremias Maerki


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org