Re: [codec] promote from sandbox

[Ryan Hoegg <rh...@isisnetworks.net>]

Just read the etiquette thing.  I think a good indicator that Codec 
Base64 is ready for consumption is its successful integration in both 
HttpClient and XML-RPC.  I see that it is used in many more projects, 
but those are the two who have been active recently.  Once we have two 
projects using it, I imagine other projects will be more likely to jump 
on board.

However, Base64's readiness for consumption is probably not enough to 
warrant Codec's promotion by itself.

Does anyone have an opinion on what they'd like to see in Codec before a 
release?  Tim's documentation on an architecture roadmap is a good 
start, imho.

--
Ryan Hoegg
ISIS Networks
http://www.isisnetworks.net

Stephen Colebourne wrote:

>Promotion is probably a good idea, but it should be without backwards
>compatability code IMO. You imply that there is a codec 1.0 release, but
>this cannot be as sandbox components may not have releases...
>
>Stephen
>  
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org