You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@streams.apache.org by "sblackmon@apache.org" <sb...@apache.org> on 2020/07/01 18:15:59 UTC
DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, NOTICE changes for apache-streams
Hello team. After some delay I’ve got some follow-up on this:
I have opened a PR for STREAMS-663: Fix DISCLAIMER that I believe removes final traces of incubating references.
https://github.com/apache/streams/pull/504
In looking into what may be missing from LICENSE, it’s not obvious to me what that would be. I’ve created STREAMS-664 to track this and commented there:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STREAMS-664
And also have created STREAMS-665 to track changes to NOTICE we may want to make prior to our first binary/bytecode release. I am looking into that now, examining what is and is not present in NOTICE for a handful of peer projects.
Steve Blackmon
On Apr 28, 2020, 5:38 PM -0500, sblackmon@apache.org <sb...@apache.org>, wrote:
> Justin,
>
> Thanks for your comment and offer to help.
>
> We are very interested in cleaning these items up sufficiently to begin releasing a binary distribution. We’ve resolved to do so in past discussions but never quite got there.
>
> I volunteer to take a first pass through based on your comments and open pull request(s) to move us closer in the next week.
>
> sblackmon
> On Apr 11, 2020, 9:26 PM -0500, Justin Mclean <jm...@apache.org>, wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Congratulations on your release.
> >
> > However, from a quick look, I can see this still needs a little work as:
> > - You're still including the incubator DISCLAIMER but are no longer an incubating project
> > - You have a large number of things in NOTICE that probably should not be there
> > - There seems to be a few things missing from LICENSE
> > - You mention LGPL/GPL licenses and are including that license text. From a quick look, all dependencies are dual licensed so you should select the more compatible license.
> >
> > I'm happy to help you in fixing these issues up if you need.
> > Kind Regards,
> > Justin
Re: DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, NOTICE changes for apache-streams
Posted by "sblackmon@apache.org" <sb...@apache.org>.
After a few more iterations I think the new binary distribution LICENSE is ready.
https://github.com/apache/streams/pull/505
I would especially appreciate feedback from those on PMC who have dealt with LICENSE/NOTICE matters on other projects.
I will lazy consensus merge this in 72 hours.
On Jul 1, 2020, 1:15 PM -0500, sblackmon@apache.org <sb...@apache.org>, wrote:
> Hello team. After some delay I’ve got some follow-up on this:
>
> I have opened a PR for STREAMS-663: Fix DISCLAIMER that I believe removes final traces of incubating references.
> https://github.com/apache/streams/pull/504
>
> In looking into what may be missing from LICENSE, it’s not obvious to me what that would be. I’ve created STREAMS-664 to track this and commented there:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STREAMS-664
>
> And also have created STREAMS-665 to track changes to NOTICE we may want to make prior to our first binary/bytecode release. I am looking into that now, examining what is and is not present in NOTICE for a handful of peer projects.
>
> Steve Blackmon
> On Apr 28, 2020, 5:38 PM -0500, sblackmon@apache.org <sb...@apache.org>, wrote:
> > Justin,
> >
> > Thanks for your comment and offer to help.
> >
> > We are very interested in cleaning these items up sufficiently to begin releasing a binary distribution. We’ve resolved to do so in past discussions but never quite got there.
> >
> > I volunteer to take a first pass through based on your comments and open pull request(s) to move us closer in the next week.
> >
> > sblackmon
> > On Apr 11, 2020, 9:26 PM -0500, Justin Mclean <jm...@apache.org>, wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Congratulations on your release.
> > >
> > > However, from a quick look, I can see this still needs a little work as:
> > > - You're still including the incubator DISCLAIMER but are no longer an incubating project
> > > - You have a large number of things in NOTICE that probably should not be there
> > > - There seems to be a few things missing from LICENSE
> > > - You mention LGPL/GPL licenses and are including that license text. From a quick look, all dependencies are dual licensed so you should select the more compatible license.
> > >
> > > I'm happy to help you in fixing these issues up if you need.
> > > Kind Regards,
> > > Justin