You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> on 2014/09/04 06:53:53 UTC

The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available, vote closing 9/10/2014

​The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available for download at
​​​https://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.6RC2/ and Maven artifacts are
also available in the temporary repository
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1035

Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.

The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12327376

This candidate contains a significant backported change, ZK-less region
assignment (HBASE-11546), thanks to the heavy lifting of Virag Kothari (and
original contributors Jimmy Xiang and Virag Kothari). The new code will not
be active unless the configuration setting "hbase.assignment.usezk" is set
to 'false'. If possible please consider testing with this configuration
change on a cluster and/or with the integration tests.

Please pardon that we've had a little trouble getting this out the door so
far. This latest 0.98.6 RC is much better for it. Though, hopefully will be
the last until 0.98.7 next month. Since RC0 the following important fixes
and improvements have gone in. Thanks to all of the reporters,
contributors, and testers involved.

   - HBASE-11726 Master should fail-safe if starting with a pre 0.96 layout
   - HBASE-11788 hbase is not deleting the cell when a Put with a KeyValue,
   KeyValue.Type.Delete is submitted
   - HBASE-11790 Bulk load should use HFileOutputFormat2 in all cases
   - HBASE-11837 Scanner from
   RegionCoprocessorEnvironment.getTable(TableName) returns no local data
   - HBASE-11844 region_mover.rb load enters an infinite loop if region
   already present on target server
   - HBASE-11857 Restore ReaderBase.initAfterCompression() and
   WALCellCodec.create(Configuration, CompressionContext)
   - HBASE-11865 Result implements CellScannable; rather it should BE a
   CellScanner
   - HBASE-11868 Data loss in hlog when the hdfs is unavailable
   - HBASE-11876 RegionScanner.nextRaw(...) should not update metrics
   - HBASE-11878
   TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay#testAddVisibilityLabelsOnRSRestart
   sometimes fails due to VisibilityController not yet initialized
   - HBASE-11886 The creator of the table should have all permissions on
   the table
   - HBASE-11887 Memory retention in branch-1; millions of instances of
   LiteralByteString for column qualifier and value

I have done some initial brief qualification of this RC:

   - Unit test suite passes 100% after 3 iterations with Java 7u65

   - Untarred hadoop1 and hadoop2 convenience binaries, ran LoadTestTool,
   no unexpected logs or results

Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time (00:00
-0800 GMT) on September 10 on whether or not we should release this as
0.98.6. Three +1 votes from PMC will be required to release.

-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Re: The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available, vote closing 9/10/2014

Posted by Esteban Gutierrez <es...@cloudera.com>.
+1 (non-binding)

build from source, ran unit tests (no IT), deployed in pseudo cluster, ran
PE and basic shell commands. things looking good.

thanks Andrew!

esteban.


--
Cloudera, Inc.


On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Anoop John <an...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> built from src
> Ran unit test.
> Ran some of the security IT tests.
> Play with some of the shell command like table create, put and read data
>
> All looks good.
>
> -Anoop-
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:08 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > LoadTestTool and PE testing checks out without issues.
> >
> > Unit test suite passes 25/25 times on JDK 7 and JDK 8.
> >
> > With JDK6,
> >
> TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay#testAddVisibilityLabelsOnRSRestart
> > fails about 50% of the time. This may be fixed by HBASE-11918. Not
> > enough to sink the RC, we had the potential for VC initialization
> > races manifesting in earlier released versions. HBASE-11918 will be in
> > .7.
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available for download
> at
> > > https://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.6RC2/ and Maven artifacts are
> > also
> > > available in the temporary repository
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1035
> > >
> > > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> > >
> > > The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12327376
> > >
> > > This candidate contains a significant backported change, ZK-less region
> > > assignment (HBASE-11546), thanks to the heavy lifting of Virag Kothari
> > (and
> > > original contributors Jimmy Xiang and Virag Kothari). The new code will
> > not
> > > be active unless the configuration setting "hbase.assignment.usezk" is
> > set
> > > to 'false'. If possible please consider testing with this configuration
> > > change on a cluster and/or with the integration tests.
> > >
> > > Please pardon that we've had a little trouble getting this out the door
> > so
> > > far. This latest 0.98.6 RC is much better for it. Though, hopefully
> will
> > be
> > > the last until 0.98.7 next month. Since RC0 the following important
> fixes
> > > and improvements have gone in. Thanks to all of the reporters,
> > contributors,
> > > and testers involved.
> > >
> > > HBASE-11726 Master should fail-safe if starting with a pre 0.96 layout
> > > HBASE-11788 hbase is not deleting the cell when a Put with a KeyValue,
> > > KeyValue.Type.Delete is submitted
> > > HBASE-11790 Bulk load should use HFileOutputFormat2 in all cases
> > > HBASE-11837 Scanner from
> RegionCoprocessorEnvironment.getTable(TableName)
> > > returns no local data
> > > HBASE-11844 region_mover.rb load enters an infinite loop if region
> > already
> > > present on target server
> > > HBASE-11857 Restore ReaderBase.initAfterCompression() and
> > > WALCellCodec.create(Configuration, CompressionContext)
> > > HBASE-11865 Result implements CellScannable; rather it should BE a
> > > CellScanner
> > > HBASE-11868 Data loss in hlog when the hdfs is unavailable
> > > HBASE-11876 RegionScanner.nextRaw(...) should not update metrics
> > > HBASE-11878
> > >
> >
> TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay#testAddVisibilityLabelsOnRSRestart
> > > sometimes fails due to VisibilityController not yet initialized
> > > HBASE-11886 The creator of the table should have all permissions on the
> > > table
> > > HBASE-11887 Memory retention in branch-1; millions of instances of
> > > LiteralByteString for column qualifier and value
> > >
> > > I have done some initial brief qualification of this RC:
> > >
> > > Unit test suite passes 100% after 3 iterations with Java 7u65
> > >
> >  > Untarred hadoop1 and hadoop2 convenience binaries, ran LoadTestTool,
> no
> > > unexpected logs or results
> > >
> > > Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
> > (00:00
> > > -0800 GMT) on September 10 on whether or not we should release this as
> > > 0.98.6. Three +1 votes from PMC will be required to release.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > >    - Andy
> > >
> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > > (via Tom White)
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > Hein (via Tom White)
> >
>

Re: The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available, vote closing 9/10/2014

Posted by Anoop John <an...@gmail.com>.
+1

built from src
Ran unit test.
Ran some of the security IT tests.
Play with some of the shell command like table create, put and read data

All looks good.

-Anoop-
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:08 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1
>
> LoadTestTool and PE testing checks out without issues.
>
> Unit test suite passes 25/25 times on JDK 7 and JDK 8.
>
> With JDK6,
> TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay#testAddVisibilityLabelsOnRSRestart
> fails about 50% of the time. This may be fixed by HBASE-11918. Not
> enough to sink the RC, we had the potential for VC initialization
> races manifesting in earlier released versions. HBASE-11918 will be in
> .7.
>
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available for download at
> > https://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.6RC2/ and Maven artifacts are
> also
> > available in the temporary repository
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1035
> >
> > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> >
> > The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12327376
> >
> > This candidate contains a significant backported change, ZK-less region
> > assignment (HBASE-11546), thanks to the heavy lifting of Virag Kothari
> (and
> > original contributors Jimmy Xiang and Virag Kothari). The new code will
> not
> > be active unless the configuration setting "hbase.assignment.usezk" is
> set
> > to 'false'. If possible please consider testing with this configuration
> > change on a cluster and/or with the integration tests.
> >
> > Please pardon that we've had a little trouble getting this out the door
> so
> > far. This latest 0.98.6 RC is much better for it. Though, hopefully will
> be
> > the last until 0.98.7 next month. Since RC0 the following important fixes
> > and improvements have gone in. Thanks to all of the reporters,
> contributors,
> > and testers involved.
> >
> > HBASE-11726 Master should fail-safe if starting with a pre 0.96 layout
> > HBASE-11788 hbase is not deleting the cell when a Put with a KeyValue,
> > KeyValue.Type.Delete is submitted
> > HBASE-11790 Bulk load should use HFileOutputFormat2 in all cases
> > HBASE-11837 Scanner from RegionCoprocessorEnvironment.getTable(TableName)
> > returns no local data
> > HBASE-11844 region_mover.rb load enters an infinite loop if region
> already
> > present on target server
> > HBASE-11857 Restore ReaderBase.initAfterCompression() and
> > WALCellCodec.create(Configuration, CompressionContext)
> > HBASE-11865 Result implements CellScannable; rather it should BE a
> > CellScanner
> > HBASE-11868 Data loss in hlog when the hdfs is unavailable
> > HBASE-11876 RegionScanner.nextRaw(...) should not update metrics
> > HBASE-11878
> >
> TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay#testAddVisibilityLabelsOnRSRestart
> > sometimes fails due to VisibilityController not yet initialized
> > HBASE-11886 The creator of the table should have all permissions on the
> > table
> > HBASE-11887 Memory retention in branch-1; millions of instances of
> > LiteralByteString for column qualifier and value
> >
> > I have done some initial brief qualification of this RC:
> >
> > Unit test suite passes 100% after 3 iterations with Java 7u65
> >
>  > Untarred hadoop1 and hadoop2 convenience binaries, ran LoadTestTool, no
> > unexpected logs or results
> >
> > Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
> (00:00
> > -0800 GMT) on September 10 on whether or not we should release this as
> > 0.98.6. Three +1 votes from PMC will be required to release.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein (via Tom White)
>

Re: The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available, vote closing 9/10/2014

Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
+1

LoadTestTool and PE testing checks out without issues.

Unit test suite passes 25/25 times on JDK 7 and JDK 8.

With JDK6, TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay#testAddVisibilityLabelsOnRSRestart
fails about 50% of the time. This may be fixed by HBASE-11918. Not
enough to sink the RC, we had the potential for VC initialization
races manifesting in earlier released versions. HBASE-11918 will be in
.7.

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available for download at
> https://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.6RC2/ and Maven artifacts are also
> available in the temporary repository
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1035
>
> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>
> The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12327376
>
> This candidate contains a significant backported change, ZK-less region
> assignment (HBASE-11546), thanks to the heavy lifting of Virag Kothari (and
> original contributors Jimmy Xiang and Virag Kothari). The new code will not
> be active unless the configuration setting "hbase.assignment.usezk" is set
> to 'false'. If possible please consider testing with this configuration
> change on a cluster and/or with the integration tests.
>
> Please pardon that we've had a little trouble getting this out the door so
> far. This latest 0.98.6 RC is much better for it. Though, hopefully will be
> the last until 0.98.7 next month. Since RC0 the following important fixes
> and improvements have gone in. Thanks to all of the reporters, contributors,
> and testers involved.
>
> HBASE-11726 Master should fail-safe if starting with a pre 0.96 layout
> HBASE-11788 hbase is not deleting the cell when a Put with a KeyValue,
> KeyValue.Type.Delete is submitted
> HBASE-11790 Bulk load should use HFileOutputFormat2 in all cases
> HBASE-11837 Scanner from RegionCoprocessorEnvironment.getTable(TableName)
> returns no local data
> HBASE-11844 region_mover.rb load enters an infinite loop if region already
> present on target server
> HBASE-11857 Restore ReaderBase.initAfterCompression() and
> WALCellCodec.create(Configuration, CompressionContext)
> HBASE-11865 Result implements CellScannable; rather it should BE a
> CellScanner
> HBASE-11868 Data loss in hlog when the hdfs is unavailable
> HBASE-11876 RegionScanner.nextRaw(...) should not update metrics
> HBASE-11878
> TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay#testAddVisibilityLabelsOnRSRestart
> sometimes fails due to VisibilityController not yet initialized
> HBASE-11886 The creator of the table should have all permissions on the
> table
> HBASE-11887 Memory retention in branch-1; millions of instances of
> LiteralByteString for column qualifier and value
>
> I have done some initial brief qualification of this RC:
>
> Unit test suite passes 100% after 3 iterations with Java 7u65
>
> Untarred hadoop1 and hadoop2 convenience binaries, ran LoadTestTool, no
> unexpected logs or results
>
> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time (00:00
> -0800 GMT) on September 10 on whether or not we should release this as
> 0.98.6. Three +1 votes from PMC will be required to release.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
Hein (via Tom White)

Re: The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available, vote closing 9/10/2014

Posted by ramkrishna vasudevan <ra...@gmail.com>.
Forgot to vote.
+1 on Rc.
Built from src.
Ran test cases.
Started cluster and tried basic commands. I did not run ITs though.

Excuse typos.
On Sep 10, 2014 11:07 AM, "ramkrishna vasudevan" <
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@gmail.com> wrote:

> No problem :)
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Pardon me Ram, I moved it out a bit early. I put it back.
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:26 PM, ramkrishna vasudevan
>> <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > https://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.6RC2/ - This path is also not
>> > available now?
>> >
>> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> My expectation is the vote will pass shortly. The release itself may
>> >> be delayed, we seem to be having an issue with ASF Nexus, see
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8327
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available for
>> download at
>> >> > https://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.6RC2/ and Maven artifacts
>> are
>> >> also
>> >> > available in the temporary repository
>> >> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1035
>> >> >
>> >> > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>> >> >
>> >> > The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
>> >> >
>> >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12327376
>> >> >
>> >> > This candidate contains a significant backported change, ZK-less
>> region
>> >> > assignment (HBASE-11546), thanks to the heavy lifting of Virag
>> Kothari
>> >> (and
>> >> > original contributors Jimmy Xiang and Virag Kothari). The new code
>> will
>> >> not
>> >> > be active unless the configuration setting "hbase.assignment.usezk"
>> is
>> >> set
>> >> > to 'false'. If possible please consider testing with this
>> configuration
>> >> > change on a cluster and/or with the integration tests.
>> >> >
>> >> > Please pardon that we've had a little trouble getting this out the
>> door
>> >> so
>> >> > far. This latest 0.98.6 RC is much better for it. Though, hopefully
>> will
>> >> be
>> >> > the last until 0.98.7 next month. Since RC0 the following important
>> fixes
>> >> > and improvements have gone in. Thanks to all of the reporters,
>> >> contributors,
>> >> > and testers involved.
>> >> >
>> >> > HBASE-11726 Master should fail-safe if starting with a pre 0.96
>> layout
>> >> > HBASE-11788 hbase is not deleting the cell when a Put with a
>> KeyValue,
>> >> > KeyValue.Type.Delete is submitted
>> >> > HBASE-11790 Bulk load should use HFileOutputFormat2 in all cases
>> >> > HBASE-11837 Scanner from
>> RegionCoprocessorEnvironment.getTable(TableName)
>> >> > returns no local data
>> >> > HBASE-11844 region_mover.rb load enters an infinite loop if region
>> >> already
>> >> > present on target server
>> >> > HBASE-11857 Restore ReaderBase.initAfterCompression() and
>> >> > WALCellCodec.create(Configuration, CompressionContext)
>> >> > HBASE-11865 Result implements CellScannable; rather it should BE a
>> >> > CellScanner
>> >> > HBASE-11868 Data loss in hlog when the hdfs is unavailable
>> >> > HBASE-11876 RegionScanner.nextRaw(...) should not update metrics
>> >> > HBASE-11878
>> >> >
>> >>
>> TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay#testAddVisibilityLabelsOnRSRestart
>> >> > sometimes fails due to VisibilityController not yet initialized
>> >> > HBASE-11886 The creator of the table should have all permissions on
>> the
>> >> > table
>> >> > HBASE-11887 Memory retention in branch-1; millions of instances of
>> >> > LiteralByteString for column qualifier and value
>> >> >
>> >> > I have done some initial brief qualification of this RC:
>> >> >
>> >> > Unit test suite passes 100% after 3 iterations with Java 7u65
>> >> >
>> >> > Untarred hadoop1 and hadoop2 convenience binaries, ran LoadTestTool,
>> no
>> >> > unexpected logs or results
>> >> >
>> >> > Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
>> >> (00:00
>> >> > -0800 GMT) on September 10 on whether or not we should release this
>> as
>> >> > 0.98.6. Three +1 votes from PMC will be required to release.
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Best regards,
>> >> >
>> >> >    - Andy
>> >> >
>> >> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
>> Hein
>> >> > (via Tom White)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Best regards,
>> >>
>> >>    - Andy
>> >>
>> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
>> >> Hein (via Tom White)
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>
>>    - Andy
>>
>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
>> Hein (via Tom White)
>>
>
>

Re: The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available, vote closing 9/10/2014

Posted by ramkrishna vasudevan <ra...@gmail.com>.
No problem :)

On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Pardon me Ram, I moved it out a bit early. I put it back.
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:26 PM, ramkrishna vasudevan
> <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > https://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.6RC2/ - This path is also not
> > available now?
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> My expectation is the vote will pass shortly. The release itself may
> >> be delayed, we seem to be having an issue with ASF Nexus, see
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8327
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available for
> download at
> >> > https://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.6RC2/ and Maven artifacts
> are
> >> also
> >> > available in the temporary repository
> >> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1035
> >> >
> >> > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> >> >
> >> > The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> >> >
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12327376
> >> >
> >> > This candidate contains a significant backported change, ZK-less
> region
> >> > assignment (HBASE-11546), thanks to the heavy lifting of Virag Kothari
> >> (and
> >> > original contributors Jimmy Xiang and Virag Kothari). The new code
> will
> >> not
> >> > be active unless the configuration setting "hbase.assignment.usezk" is
> >> set
> >> > to 'false'. If possible please consider testing with this
> configuration
> >> > change on a cluster and/or with the integration tests.
> >> >
> >> > Please pardon that we've had a little trouble getting this out the
> door
> >> so
> >> > far. This latest 0.98.6 RC is much better for it. Though, hopefully
> will
> >> be
> >> > the last until 0.98.7 next month. Since RC0 the following important
> fixes
> >> > and improvements have gone in. Thanks to all of the reporters,
> >> contributors,
> >> > and testers involved.
> >> >
> >> > HBASE-11726 Master should fail-safe if starting with a pre 0.96 layout
> >> > HBASE-11788 hbase is not deleting the cell when a Put with a KeyValue,
> >> > KeyValue.Type.Delete is submitted
> >> > HBASE-11790 Bulk load should use HFileOutputFormat2 in all cases
> >> > HBASE-11837 Scanner from
> RegionCoprocessorEnvironment.getTable(TableName)
> >> > returns no local data
> >> > HBASE-11844 region_mover.rb load enters an infinite loop if region
> >> already
> >> > present on target server
> >> > HBASE-11857 Restore ReaderBase.initAfterCompression() and
> >> > WALCellCodec.create(Configuration, CompressionContext)
> >> > HBASE-11865 Result implements CellScannable; rather it should BE a
> >> > CellScanner
> >> > HBASE-11868 Data loss in hlog when the hdfs is unavailable
> >> > HBASE-11876 RegionScanner.nextRaw(...) should not update metrics
> >> > HBASE-11878
> >> >
> >>
> TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay#testAddVisibilityLabelsOnRSRestart
> >> > sometimes fails due to VisibilityController not yet initialized
> >> > HBASE-11886 The creator of the table should have all permissions on
> the
> >> > table
> >> > HBASE-11887 Memory retention in branch-1; millions of instances of
> >> > LiteralByteString for column qualifier and value
> >> >
> >> > I have done some initial brief qualification of this RC:
> >> >
> >> > Unit test suite passes 100% after 3 iterations with Java 7u65
> >> >
> >> > Untarred hadoop1 and hadoop2 convenience binaries, ran LoadTestTool,
> no
> >> > unexpected logs or results
> >> >
> >> > Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
> >> (00:00
> >> > -0800 GMT) on September 10 on whether or not we should release this as
> >> > 0.98.6. Three +1 votes from PMC will be required to release.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Best regards,
> >> >
> >> >    - Andy
> >> >
> >> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> >> > (via Tom White)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >>    - Andy
> >>
> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> >> Hein (via Tom White)
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein (via Tom White)
>

Re: The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available, vote closing 9/10/2014

Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
Pardon me Ram, I moved it out a bit early. I put it back.

On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:26 PM, ramkrishna vasudevan
<ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.6RC2/ - This path is also not
> available now?
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> My expectation is the vote will pass shortly. The release itself may
>> be delayed, we seem to be having an issue with ASF Nexus, see
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8327
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available for download at
>> > https://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.6RC2/ and Maven artifacts are
>> also
>> > available in the temporary repository
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1035
>> >
>> > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>> >
>> > The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12327376
>> >
>> > This candidate contains a significant backported change, ZK-less region
>> > assignment (HBASE-11546), thanks to the heavy lifting of Virag Kothari
>> (and
>> > original contributors Jimmy Xiang and Virag Kothari). The new code will
>> not
>> > be active unless the configuration setting "hbase.assignment.usezk" is
>> set
>> > to 'false'. If possible please consider testing with this configuration
>> > change on a cluster and/or with the integration tests.
>> >
>> > Please pardon that we've had a little trouble getting this out the door
>> so
>> > far. This latest 0.98.6 RC is much better for it. Though, hopefully will
>> be
>> > the last until 0.98.7 next month. Since RC0 the following important fixes
>> > and improvements have gone in. Thanks to all of the reporters,
>> contributors,
>> > and testers involved.
>> >
>> > HBASE-11726 Master should fail-safe if starting with a pre 0.96 layout
>> > HBASE-11788 hbase is not deleting the cell when a Put with a KeyValue,
>> > KeyValue.Type.Delete is submitted
>> > HBASE-11790 Bulk load should use HFileOutputFormat2 in all cases
>> > HBASE-11837 Scanner from RegionCoprocessorEnvironment.getTable(TableName)
>> > returns no local data
>> > HBASE-11844 region_mover.rb load enters an infinite loop if region
>> already
>> > present on target server
>> > HBASE-11857 Restore ReaderBase.initAfterCompression() and
>> > WALCellCodec.create(Configuration, CompressionContext)
>> > HBASE-11865 Result implements CellScannable; rather it should BE a
>> > CellScanner
>> > HBASE-11868 Data loss in hlog when the hdfs is unavailable
>> > HBASE-11876 RegionScanner.nextRaw(...) should not update metrics
>> > HBASE-11878
>> >
>> TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay#testAddVisibilityLabelsOnRSRestart
>> > sometimes fails due to VisibilityController not yet initialized
>> > HBASE-11886 The creator of the table should have all permissions on the
>> > table
>> > HBASE-11887 Memory retention in branch-1; millions of instances of
>> > LiteralByteString for column qualifier and value
>> >
>> > I have done some initial brief qualification of this RC:
>> >
>> > Unit test suite passes 100% after 3 iterations with Java 7u65
>> >
>> > Untarred hadoop1 and hadoop2 convenience binaries, ran LoadTestTool, no
>> > unexpected logs or results
>> >
>> > Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
>> (00:00
>> > -0800 GMT) on September 10 on whether or not we should release this as
>> > 0.98.6. Three +1 votes from PMC will be required to release.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best regards,
>> >
>> >    - Andy
>> >
>> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>> > (via Tom White)
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>
>>    - Andy
>>
>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
>> Hein (via Tom White)
>>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
Hein (via Tom White)

Re: The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available, vote closing 9/10/2014

Posted by ramkrishna vasudevan <ra...@gmail.com>.
​​​https://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.6RC2/ - This path is also not
available now?

On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
wrote:

> My expectation is the vote will pass shortly. The release itself may
> be delayed, we seem to be having an issue with ASF Nexus, see
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8327
>
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available for download at
> > https://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.6RC2/ and Maven artifacts are
> also
> > available in the temporary repository
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1035
> >
> > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> >
> > The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12327376
> >
> > This candidate contains a significant backported change, ZK-less region
> > assignment (HBASE-11546), thanks to the heavy lifting of Virag Kothari
> (and
> > original contributors Jimmy Xiang and Virag Kothari). The new code will
> not
> > be active unless the configuration setting "hbase.assignment.usezk" is
> set
> > to 'false'. If possible please consider testing with this configuration
> > change on a cluster and/or with the integration tests.
> >
> > Please pardon that we've had a little trouble getting this out the door
> so
> > far. This latest 0.98.6 RC is much better for it. Though, hopefully will
> be
> > the last until 0.98.7 next month. Since RC0 the following important fixes
> > and improvements have gone in. Thanks to all of the reporters,
> contributors,
> > and testers involved.
> >
> > HBASE-11726 Master should fail-safe if starting with a pre 0.96 layout
> > HBASE-11788 hbase is not deleting the cell when a Put with a KeyValue,
> > KeyValue.Type.Delete is submitted
> > HBASE-11790 Bulk load should use HFileOutputFormat2 in all cases
> > HBASE-11837 Scanner from RegionCoprocessorEnvironment.getTable(TableName)
> > returns no local data
> > HBASE-11844 region_mover.rb load enters an infinite loop if region
> already
> > present on target server
> > HBASE-11857 Restore ReaderBase.initAfterCompression() and
> > WALCellCodec.create(Configuration, CompressionContext)
> > HBASE-11865 Result implements CellScannable; rather it should BE a
> > CellScanner
> > HBASE-11868 Data loss in hlog when the hdfs is unavailable
> > HBASE-11876 RegionScanner.nextRaw(...) should not update metrics
> > HBASE-11878
> >
> TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay#testAddVisibilityLabelsOnRSRestart
> > sometimes fails due to VisibilityController not yet initialized
> > HBASE-11886 The creator of the table should have all permissions on the
> > table
> > HBASE-11887 Memory retention in branch-1; millions of instances of
> > LiteralByteString for column qualifier and value
> >
> > I have done some initial brief qualification of this RC:
> >
> > Unit test suite passes 100% after 3 iterations with Java 7u65
> >
> > Untarred hadoop1 and hadoop2 convenience binaries, ran LoadTestTool, no
> > unexpected logs or results
> >
> > Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
> (00:00
> > -0800 GMT) on September 10 on whether or not we should release this as
> > 0.98.6. Three +1 votes from PMC will be required to release.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein (via Tom White)
>

Re: The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available, vote closing 9/10/2014

Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
My expectation is the vote will pass shortly. The release itself may
be delayed, we seem to be having an issue with ASF Nexus, see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8327

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available for download at
> https://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.6RC2/ and Maven artifacts are also
> available in the temporary repository
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1035
>
> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>
> The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12327376
>
> This candidate contains a significant backported change, ZK-less region
> assignment (HBASE-11546), thanks to the heavy lifting of Virag Kothari (and
> original contributors Jimmy Xiang and Virag Kothari). The new code will not
> be active unless the configuration setting "hbase.assignment.usezk" is set
> to 'false'. If possible please consider testing with this configuration
> change on a cluster and/or with the integration tests.
>
> Please pardon that we've had a little trouble getting this out the door so
> far. This latest 0.98.6 RC is much better for it. Though, hopefully will be
> the last until 0.98.7 next month. Since RC0 the following important fixes
> and improvements have gone in. Thanks to all of the reporters, contributors,
> and testers involved.
>
> HBASE-11726 Master should fail-safe if starting with a pre 0.96 layout
> HBASE-11788 hbase is not deleting the cell when a Put with a KeyValue,
> KeyValue.Type.Delete is submitted
> HBASE-11790 Bulk load should use HFileOutputFormat2 in all cases
> HBASE-11837 Scanner from RegionCoprocessorEnvironment.getTable(TableName)
> returns no local data
> HBASE-11844 region_mover.rb load enters an infinite loop if region already
> present on target server
> HBASE-11857 Restore ReaderBase.initAfterCompression() and
> WALCellCodec.create(Configuration, CompressionContext)
> HBASE-11865 Result implements CellScannable; rather it should BE a
> CellScanner
> HBASE-11868 Data loss in hlog when the hdfs is unavailable
> HBASE-11876 RegionScanner.nextRaw(...) should not update metrics
> HBASE-11878
> TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay#testAddVisibilityLabelsOnRSRestart
> sometimes fails due to VisibilityController not yet initialized
> HBASE-11886 The creator of the table should have all permissions on the
> table
> HBASE-11887 Memory retention in branch-1; millions of instances of
> LiteralByteString for column qualifier and value
>
> I have done some initial brief qualification of this RC:
>
> Unit test suite passes 100% after 3 iterations with Java 7u65
>
> Untarred hadoop1 and hadoop2 convenience binaries, ran LoadTestTool, no
> unexpected logs or results
>
> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time (00:00
> -0800 GMT) on September 10 on whether or not we should release this as
> 0.98.6. Three +1 votes from PMC will be required to release.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
Hein (via Tom White)

Re: The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available, vote closing 9/10/2014

Posted by Jean-Marc Spaggiari <je...@spaggiari.org>.
Better late than never: Performances are aligned with previous releases.

However, both IntegrationTestBigLinkedList and IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify
failed

    org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestBigLinkedList$Verify$Counts
        REFERENCED=12000000
java.lang.RuntimeException: Verify.verify failed
    at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestBigLinkedList$Loop.runVerify(IntegrationTestBigLinkedList.java:810)

should have been 6000000.

IntegrationTestBigLinkedList failed 2 times our of 3 (On with 12000000 and
one with 9000000) but IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify always fail. I have also
not been able to run HLogPerformanceEvaluation for any of the 0.98.x
releases.

JM

2014-09-11 0:13 GMT-04:00 Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>:

> Thanks for checking the RC, even if late :-)
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Enis Söztutar <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > My late +1.
> >
> > Checked sigs, checksums, dir layout, hadoop libs, ran local mode both
> > binary artifacts, run LTT, shell smoke tests.
> >
> > It seems the INFRA issue is resolved. I just pushed the 0.96.3-SNAPSHOT
> > jars to test.
> >
> > Enis
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> > jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:
> >
> >> FYI,
> >>
> >> I have perfs tests running but so far, so good. Did also some other
> basics
> >> test and found the same as what Andrew reported for JDK6 +
> >> TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistri
> >> butedLogReplay.
> >>
> >> I will post the perfs tests results as soon as I have them (After this
> got
> >> released probably).
> >>
> >> JM
> >>
> >> 2014-09-10 15:15 GMT-04:00 Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>:
> >>
> >> > With 6 +1 votes (5 binding) and no 0 or -1 votes, this vote passes.
> >> > Thanks to all who tried out the RC and voted. Let's do it again next
> >> > month.
> >> >
> >> > The source and binary convenience tarballs are probably already
> >> > available for download on the mirrors. We are having Nexus issues (see
> >> > INFRA-8326 and INFRA-8327,  among others), so I will be delaying a
> >> > release announcement for a bit until hopefully Maven artifacts can be
> >> > in place.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available for
> download
> >> at
> >> > > https://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.6RC2/ and Maven artifacts
> are
> >> > also
> >> > > available in the temporary repository
> >> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1035
> >> > >
> >> > > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> >> > >
> >> > > The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12327376
> >> > >
> >> > > This candidate contains a significant backported change, ZK-less
> region
> >> > > assignment (HBASE-11546), thanks to the heavy lifting of Virag
> Kothari
> >> > (and
> >> > > original contributors Jimmy Xiang and Virag Kothari). The new code
> will
> >> > not
> >> > > be active unless the configuration setting "hbase.assignment.usezk"
> is
> >> > set
> >> > > to 'false'. If possible please consider testing with this
> configuration
> >> > > change on a cluster and/or with the integration tests.
> >> > >
> >> > > Please pardon that we've had a little trouble getting this out the
> door
> >> > so
> >> > > far. This latest 0.98.6 RC is much better for it. Though, hopefully
> >> will
> >> > be
> >> > > the last until 0.98.7 next month. Since RC0 the following important
> >> fixes
> >> > > and improvements have gone in. Thanks to all of the reporters,
> >> > contributors,
> >> > > and testers involved.
> >> > >
> >> > > HBASE-11726 Master should fail-safe if starting with a pre 0.96
> layout
> >> > > HBASE-11788 hbase is not deleting the cell when a Put with a
> KeyValue,
> >> > > KeyValue.Type.Delete is submitted
> >> > > HBASE-11790 Bulk load should use HFileOutputFormat2 in all cases
> >> > > HBASE-11837 Scanner from
> >> RegionCoprocessorEnvironment.getTable(TableName)
> >> > > returns no local data
> >> > > HBASE-11844 region_mover.rb load enters an infinite loop if region
> >> > already
> >> > > present on target server
> >> > > HBASE-11857 Restore ReaderBase.initAfterCompression() and
> >> > > WALCellCodec.create(Configuration, CompressionContext)
> >> > > HBASE-11865 Result implements CellScannable; rather it should BE a
> >> > > CellScanner
> >> > > HBASE-11868 Data loss in hlog when the hdfs is unavailable
> >> > > HBASE-11876 RegionScanner.nextRaw(...) should not update metrics
> >> > > HBASE-11878
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay#testAddVisibilityLabelsOnRSRestart
> >> > > sometimes fails due to VisibilityController not yet initialized
> >> > > HBASE-11886 The creator of the table should have all permissions on
> the
> >> > > table
> >> > > HBASE-11887 Memory retention in branch-1; millions of instances of
> >> > > LiteralByteString for column qualifier and value
> >> > >
> >> > > I have done some initial brief qualification of this RC:
> >> > >
> >> > > Unit test suite passes 100% after 3 iterations with Java 7u65
> >> > >
> >> > > Untarred hadoop1 and hadoop2 convenience binaries, ran
> LoadTestTool, no
> >> > > unexpected logs or results
> >> > >
> >> > > Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
> >> > (00:00
> >> > > -0800 GMT) on September 10 on whether or not we should release this
> as
> >> > > 0.98.6. Three +1 votes from PMC will be required to release.
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Best regards,
> >> > >
> >> > >    - Andy
> >> > >
> >> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> >> Hein
> >> > > (via Tom White)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Best regards,
> >> >
> >> >    - Andy
> >> >
> >> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> >> > Hein (via Tom White)
> >> >
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein (via Tom White)
>

Re: The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available, vote closing 9/10/2014

Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
Thanks for checking the RC, even if late :-)

On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Enis Söztutar <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My late +1.
>
> Checked sigs, checksums, dir layout, hadoop libs, ran local mode both
> binary artifacts, run LTT, shell smoke tests.
>
> It seems the INFRA issue is resolved. I just pushed the 0.96.3-SNAPSHOT
> jars to test.
>
> Enis
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:
>
>> FYI,
>>
>> I have perfs tests running but so far, so good. Did also some other basics
>> test and found the same as what Andrew reported for JDK6 +
>> TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistri
>> butedLogReplay.
>>
>> I will post the perfs tests results as soon as I have them (After this got
>> released probably).
>>
>> JM
>>
>> 2014-09-10 15:15 GMT-04:00 Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>:
>>
>> > With 6 +1 votes (5 binding) and no 0 or -1 votes, this vote passes.
>> > Thanks to all who tried out the RC and voted. Let's do it again next
>> > month.
>> >
>> > The source and binary convenience tarballs are probably already
>> > available for download on the mirrors. We are having Nexus issues (see
>> > INFRA-8326 and INFRA-8327,  among others), so I will be delaying a
>> > release announcement for a bit until hopefully Maven artifacts can be
>> > in place.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > > The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available for download
>> at
>> > > https://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.6RC2/ and Maven artifacts are
>> > also
>> > > available in the temporary repository
>> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1035
>> > >
>> > > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>> > >
>> > > The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12327376
>> > >
>> > > This candidate contains a significant backported change, ZK-less region
>> > > assignment (HBASE-11546), thanks to the heavy lifting of Virag Kothari
>> > (and
>> > > original contributors Jimmy Xiang and Virag Kothari). The new code will
>> > not
>> > > be active unless the configuration setting "hbase.assignment.usezk" is
>> > set
>> > > to 'false'. If possible please consider testing with this configuration
>> > > change on a cluster and/or with the integration tests.
>> > >
>> > > Please pardon that we've had a little trouble getting this out the door
>> > so
>> > > far. This latest 0.98.6 RC is much better for it. Though, hopefully
>> will
>> > be
>> > > the last until 0.98.7 next month. Since RC0 the following important
>> fixes
>> > > and improvements have gone in. Thanks to all of the reporters,
>> > contributors,
>> > > and testers involved.
>> > >
>> > > HBASE-11726 Master should fail-safe if starting with a pre 0.96 layout
>> > > HBASE-11788 hbase is not deleting the cell when a Put with a KeyValue,
>> > > KeyValue.Type.Delete is submitted
>> > > HBASE-11790 Bulk load should use HFileOutputFormat2 in all cases
>> > > HBASE-11837 Scanner from
>> RegionCoprocessorEnvironment.getTable(TableName)
>> > > returns no local data
>> > > HBASE-11844 region_mover.rb load enters an infinite loop if region
>> > already
>> > > present on target server
>> > > HBASE-11857 Restore ReaderBase.initAfterCompression() and
>> > > WALCellCodec.create(Configuration, CompressionContext)
>> > > HBASE-11865 Result implements CellScannable; rather it should BE a
>> > > CellScanner
>> > > HBASE-11868 Data loss in hlog when the hdfs is unavailable
>> > > HBASE-11876 RegionScanner.nextRaw(...) should not update metrics
>> > > HBASE-11878
>> > >
>> >
>> TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay#testAddVisibilityLabelsOnRSRestart
>> > > sometimes fails due to VisibilityController not yet initialized
>> > > HBASE-11886 The creator of the table should have all permissions on the
>> > > table
>> > > HBASE-11887 Memory retention in branch-1; millions of instances of
>> > > LiteralByteString for column qualifier and value
>> > >
>> > > I have done some initial brief qualification of this RC:
>> > >
>> > > Unit test suite passes 100% after 3 iterations with Java 7u65
>> > >
>> > > Untarred hadoop1 and hadoop2 convenience binaries, ran LoadTestTool, no
>> > > unexpected logs or results
>> > >
>> > > Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
>> > (00:00
>> > > -0800 GMT) on September 10 on whether or not we should release this as
>> > > 0.98.6. Three +1 votes from PMC will be required to release.
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Best regards,
>> > >
>> > >    - Andy
>> > >
>> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
>> Hein
>> > > (via Tom White)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best regards,
>> >
>> >    - Andy
>> >
>> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
>> > Hein (via Tom White)
>> >
>>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
Hein (via Tom White)

Re: The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available, vote closing 9/10/2014

Posted by Enis Söztutar <en...@gmail.com>.
My late +1.

Checked sigs, checksums, dir layout, hadoop libs, ran local mode both
binary artifacts, run LTT, shell smoke tests.

It seems the INFRA issue is resolved. I just pushed the 0.96.3-SNAPSHOT
jars to test.

Enis



On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:

> FYI,
>
> I have perfs tests running but so far, so good. Did also some other basics
> test and found the same as what Andrew reported for JDK6 +
> TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistri
> butedLogReplay.
>
> I will post the perfs tests results as soon as I have them (After this got
> released probably).
>
> JM
>
> 2014-09-10 15:15 GMT-04:00 Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>:
>
> > With 6 +1 votes (5 binding) and no 0 or -1 votes, this vote passes.
> > Thanks to all who tried out the RC and voted. Let's do it again next
> > month.
> >
> > The source and binary convenience tarballs are probably already
> > available for download on the mirrors. We are having Nexus issues (see
> > INFRA-8326 and INFRA-8327,  among others), so I will be delaying a
> > release announcement for a bit until hopefully Maven artifacts can be
> > in place.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available for download
> at
> > > https://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.6RC2/ and Maven artifacts are
> > also
> > > available in the temporary repository
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1035
> > >
> > > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> > >
> > > The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12327376
> > >
> > > This candidate contains a significant backported change, ZK-less region
> > > assignment (HBASE-11546), thanks to the heavy lifting of Virag Kothari
> > (and
> > > original contributors Jimmy Xiang and Virag Kothari). The new code will
> > not
> > > be active unless the configuration setting "hbase.assignment.usezk" is
> > set
> > > to 'false'. If possible please consider testing with this configuration
> > > change on a cluster and/or with the integration tests.
> > >
> > > Please pardon that we've had a little trouble getting this out the door
> > so
> > > far. This latest 0.98.6 RC is much better for it. Though, hopefully
> will
> > be
> > > the last until 0.98.7 next month. Since RC0 the following important
> fixes
> > > and improvements have gone in. Thanks to all of the reporters,
> > contributors,
> > > and testers involved.
> > >
> > > HBASE-11726 Master should fail-safe if starting with a pre 0.96 layout
> > > HBASE-11788 hbase is not deleting the cell when a Put with a KeyValue,
> > > KeyValue.Type.Delete is submitted
> > > HBASE-11790 Bulk load should use HFileOutputFormat2 in all cases
> > > HBASE-11837 Scanner from
> RegionCoprocessorEnvironment.getTable(TableName)
> > > returns no local data
> > > HBASE-11844 region_mover.rb load enters an infinite loop if region
> > already
> > > present on target server
> > > HBASE-11857 Restore ReaderBase.initAfterCompression() and
> > > WALCellCodec.create(Configuration, CompressionContext)
> > > HBASE-11865 Result implements CellScannable; rather it should BE a
> > > CellScanner
> > > HBASE-11868 Data loss in hlog when the hdfs is unavailable
> > > HBASE-11876 RegionScanner.nextRaw(...) should not update metrics
> > > HBASE-11878
> > >
> >
> TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay#testAddVisibilityLabelsOnRSRestart
> > > sometimes fails due to VisibilityController not yet initialized
> > > HBASE-11886 The creator of the table should have all permissions on the
> > > table
> > > HBASE-11887 Memory retention in branch-1; millions of instances of
> > > LiteralByteString for column qualifier and value
> > >
> > > I have done some initial brief qualification of this RC:
> > >
> > > Unit test suite passes 100% after 3 iterations with Java 7u65
> > >
> > > Untarred hadoop1 and hadoop2 convenience binaries, ran LoadTestTool, no
> > > unexpected logs or results
> > >
> > > Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
> > (00:00
> > > -0800 GMT) on September 10 on whether or not we should release this as
> > > 0.98.6. Three +1 votes from PMC will be required to release.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > >    - Andy
> > >
> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > > (via Tom White)
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > Hein (via Tom White)
> >
>

Re: The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available, vote closing 9/10/2014

Posted by Jean-Marc Spaggiari <je...@spaggiari.org>.
FYI,

I have perfs tests running but so far, so good. Did also some other basics
test and found the same as what Andrew reported for JDK6 +
TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistri
butedLogReplay.

I will post the perfs tests results as soon as I have them (After this got
released probably).

JM

2014-09-10 15:15 GMT-04:00 Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>:

> With 6 +1 votes (5 binding) and no 0 or -1 votes, this vote passes.
> Thanks to all who tried out the RC and voted. Let's do it again next
> month.
>
> The source and binary convenience tarballs are probably already
> available for download on the mirrors. We are having Nexus issues (see
> INFRA-8326 and INFRA-8327,  among others), so I will be delaying a
> release announcement for a bit until hopefully Maven artifacts can be
> in place.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available for download at
> > https://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.6RC2/ and Maven artifacts are
> also
> > available in the temporary repository
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1035
> >
> > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> >
> > The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12327376
> >
> > This candidate contains a significant backported change, ZK-less region
> > assignment (HBASE-11546), thanks to the heavy lifting of Virag Kothari
> (and
> > original contributors Jimmy Xiang and Virag Kothari). The new code will
> not
> > be active unless the configuration setting "hbase.assignment.usezk" is
> set
> > to 'false'. If possible please consider testing with this configuration
> > change on a cluster and/or with the integration tests.
> >
> > Please pardon that we've had a little trouble getting this out the door
> so
> > far. This latest 0.98.6 RC is much better for it. Though, hopefully will
> be
> > the last until 0.98.7 next month. Since RC0 the following important fixes
> > and improvements have gone in. Thanks to all of the reporters,
> contributors,
> > and testers involved.
> >
> > HBASE-11726 Master should fail-safe if starting with a pre 0.96 layout
> > HBASE-11788 hbase is not deleting the cell when a Put with a KeyValue,
> > KeyValue.Type.Delete is submitted
> > HBASE-11790 Bulk load should use HFileOutputFormat2 in all cases
> > HBASE-11837 Scanner from RegionCoprocessorEnvironment.getTable(TableName)
> > returns no local data
> > HBASE-11844 region_mover.rb load enters an infinite loop if region
> already
> > present on target server
> > HBASE-11857 Restore ReaderBase.initAfterCompression() and
> > WALCellCodec.create(Configuration, CompressionContext)
> > HBASE-11865 Result implements CellScannable; rather it should BE a
> > CellScanner
> > HBASE-11868 Data loss in hlog when the hdfs is unavailable
> > HBASE-11876 RegionScanner.nextRaw(...) should not update metrics
> > HBASE-11878
> >
> TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay#testAddVisibilityLabelsOnRSRestart
> > sometimes fails due to VisibilityController not yet initialized
> > HBASE-11886 The creator of the table should have all permissions on the
> > table
> > HBASE-11887 Memory retention in branch-1; millions of instances of
> > LiteralByteString for column qualifier and value
> >
> > I have done some initial brief qualification of this RC:
> >
> > Unit test suite passes 100% after 3 iterations with Java 7u65
> >
> > Untarred hadoop1 and hadoop2 convenience binaries, ran LoadTestTool, no
> > unexpected logs or results
> >
> > Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
> (00:00
> > -0800 GMT) on September 10 on whether or not we should release this as
> > 0.98.6. Three +1 votes from PMC will be required to release.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein (via Tom White)
>

Re: The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available, vote closing 9/10/2014

Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
With 6 +1 votes (5 binding) and no 0 or -1 votes, this vote passes.
Thanks to all who tried out the RC and voted. Let's do it again next
month.

The source and binary convenience tarballs are probably already
available for download on the mirrors. We are having Nexus issues (see
INFRA-8326 and INFRA-8327,  among others), so I will be delaying a
release announcement for a bit until hopefully Maven artifacts can be
in place.



On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available for download at
> https://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.6RC2/ and Maven artifacts are also
> available in the temporary repository
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1035
>
> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>
> The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12327376
>
> This candidate contains a significant backported change, ZK-less region
> assignment (HBASE-11546), thanks to the heavy lifting of Virag Kothari (and
> original contributors Jimmy Xiang and Virag Kothari). The new code will not
> be active unless the configuration setting "hbase.assignment.usezk" is set
> to 'false'. If possible please consider testing with this configuration
> change on a cluster and/or with the integration tests.
>
> Please pardon that we've had a little trouble getting this out the door so
> far. This latest 0.98.6 RC is much better for it. Though, hopefully will be
> the last until 0.98.7 next month. Since RC0 the following important fixes
> and improvements have gone in. Thanks to all of the reporters, contributors,
> and testers involved.
>
> HBASE-11726 Master should fail-safe if starting with a pre 0.96 layout
> HBASE-11788 hbase is not deleting the cell when a Put with a KeyValue,
> KeyValue.Type.Delete is submitted
> HBASE-11790 Bulk load should use HFileOutputFormat2 in all cases
> HBASE-11837 Scanner from RegionCoprocessorEnvironment.getTable(TableName)
> returns no local data
> HBASE-11844 region_mover.rb load enters an infinite loop if region already
> present on target server
> HBASE-11857 Restore ReaderBase.initAfterCompression() and
> WALCellCodec.create(Configuration, CompressionContext)
> HBASE-11865 Result implements CellScannable; rather it should BE a
> CellScanner
> HBASE-11868 Data loss in hlog when the hdfs is unavailable
> HBASE-11876 RegionScanner.nextRaw(...) should not update metrics
> HBASE-11878
> TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay#testAddVisibilityLabelsOnRSRestart
> sometimes fails due to VisibilityController not yet initialized
> HBASE-11886 The creator of the table should have all permissions on the
> table
> HBASE-11887 Memory retention in branch-1; millions of instances of
> LiteralByteString for column qualifier and value
>
> I have done some initial brief qualification of this RC:
>
> Unit test suite passes 100% after 3 iterations with Java 7u65
>
> Untarred hadoop1 and hadoop2 convenience binaries, ran LoadTestTool, no
> unexpected logs or results
>
> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time (00:00
> -0800 GMT) on September 10 on whether or not we should release this as
> 0.98.6. Three +1 votes from PMC will be required to release.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
Hein (via Tom White)

Re: The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available, vote closing 9/10/2014

Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
Verified signtaure.
Deployed on 3 node cluster and ran LoadTestTool
Done some random shell ops.
All looks good

+1


On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:

> ​The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available for download at
> ​​​https://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.6RC2/ and Maven artifacts are
> also available in the temporary repository
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1035
>
> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>
> The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12327376
>
> This candidate contains a significant backported change, ZK-less region
> assignment (HBASE-11546), thanks to the heavy lifting of Virag Kothari (and
> original contributors Jimmy Xiang and Virag Kothari). The new code will not
> be active unless the configuration setting "hbase.assignment.usezk" is set
> to 'false'. If possible please consider testing with this configuration
> change on a cluster and/or with the integration tests.
>
> Please pardon that we've had a little trouble getting this out the door so
> far. This latest 0.98.6 RC is much better for it. Though, hopefully will be
> the last until 0.98.7 next month. Since RC0 the following important fixes
> and improvements have gone in. Thanks to all of the reporters,
> contributors, and testers involved.
>
>    - HBASE-11726 Master should fail-safe if starting with a pre 0.96 layout
>    - HBASE-11788 hbase is not deleting the cell when a Put with a KeyValue,
>    KeyValue.Type.Delete is submitted
>    - HBASE-11790 Bulk load should use HFileOutputFormat2 in all cases
>    - HBASE-11837 Scanner from
>    RegionCoprocessorEnvironment.getTable(TableName) returns no local data
>    - HBASE-11844 region_mover.rb load enters an infinite loop if region
>    already present on target server
>    - HBASE-11857 Restore ReaderBase.initAfterCompression() and
>    WALCellCodec.create(Configuration, CompressionContext)
>    - HBASE-11865 Result implements CellScannable; rather it should BE a
>    CellScanner
>    - HBASE-11868 Data loss in hlog when the hdfs is unavailable
>    - HBASE-11876 RegionScanner.nextRaw(...) should not update metrics
>    - HBASE-11878
>
>  TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay#testAddVisibilityLabelsOnRSRestart
>    sometimes fails due to VisibilityController not yet initialized
>    - HBASE-11886 The creator of the table should have all permissions on
>    the table
>    - HBASE-11887 Memory retention in branch-1; millions of instances of
>    LiteralByteString for column qualifier and value
>
> I have done some initial brief qualification of this RC:
>
>    - Unit test suite passes 100% after 3 iterations with Java 7u65
>
>    - Untarred hadoop1 and hadoop2 convenience binaries, ran LoadTestTool,
>    no unexpected logs or results
>
> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time (00:00
> -0800 GMT) on September 10 on whether or not we should release this as
> 0.98.6. Three +1 votes from PMC will be required to release.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>

Re: The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available, vote closing 9/10/2014

Posted by lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org>.
+1

- checked out the tarballs. Documentation, layout, etc
- built from source and tried the binary tarballs
- inserted some data, scanned, flushed, compacted, etc. All checks out.
- no strange log messages
- went through the list of included jiras and looked through many of the patches

-- Lars



________________________________
 From: Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <de...@hbase.apache.org> 
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 9:53 PM
Subject: The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available, vote closing 9/10/2014
 

​The 3nd HBase 0.98.6 release candidate (RC2) is available for download at
​​​https://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.6RC2/ and Maven artifacts are
also available in the temporary repository
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1035

Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.

The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12327376

This candidate contains a significant backported change, ZK-less region
assignment (HBASE-11546), thanks to the heavy lifting of Virag Kothari (and
original contributors Jimmy Xiang and Virag Kothari). The new code will not
be active unless the configuration setting "hbase.assignment.usezk" is set
to 'false'. If possible please consider testing with this configuration
change on a cluster and/or with the integration tests.

Please pardon that we've had a little trouble getting this out the door so
far. This latest 0.98.6 RC is much better for it. Though, hopefully will be
the last until 0.98.7 next month. Since RC0 the following important fixes
and improvements have gone in. Thanks to all of the reporters,
contributors, and testers involved.

   - HBASE-11726 Master should fail-safe if starting with a pre 0.96 layout
   - HBASE-11788 hbase is not deleting the cell when a Put with a KeyValue,
   KeyValue.Type.Delete is submitted
   - HBASE-11790 Bulk load should use HFileOutputFormat2 in all cases
   - HBASE-11837 Scanner from
   RegionCoprocessorEnvironment.getTable(TableName) returns no local data
   - HBASE-11844 region_mover.rb load enters an infinite loop if region
   already present on target server
   - HBASE-11857 Restore ReaderBase.initAfterCompression() and
   WALCellCodec.create(Configuration, CompressionContext)
   - HBASE-11865 Result implements CellScannable; rather it should BE a
   CellScanner
   - HBASE-11868 Data loss in hlog when the hdfs is unavailable
   - HBASE-11876 RegionScanner.nextRaw(...) should not update metrics
   - HBASE-11878
   TestVisibilityLabelsWithDistributedLogReplay#testAddVisibilityLabelsOnRSRestart
   sometimes fails due to VisibilityController not yet initialized
   - HBASE-11886 The creator of the table should have all permissions on
   the table
   - HBASE-11887 Memory retention in branch-1; millions of instances of
   LiteralByteString for column qualifier and value

I have done some initial brief qualification of this RC:

   - Unit test suite passes 100% after 3 iterations with Java 7u65

   - Untarred hadoop1 and hadoop2 convenience binaries, ran LoadTestTool,
   no unexpected logs or results

Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time (00:00
-0800 GMT) on September 10 on whether or not we should release this as
0.98.6. Three +1 votes from PMC will be required to release.

-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)