You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@bloodhound.apache.org by Olemis Lang <ol...@gmail.com> on 2013/07/31 20:00:34 UTC

Introducing bhnet tag WAS: [Apache Bloodhound] #618: Parent/child updates for QCT

Posted by Olemis Lang <ol...@gmail.com>.
On 8/1/13, Ryan Ollos <ry...@wandisco.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Olemis Lang <ol...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi !
>> :)
>>
>> If you noticed a number of edits like the one shown below it's because
>> I've been tagging some of them with bhnet keyword so as to identify
>> the issues detected / reported while using/deploying blood-hound.net .
>> That will allow us to find them more quickly .
>>
>> I apologize if this caused any trouble and, if there's a chance to
>> reduce the noise in te future, kindly request BATCH_MODIFY permission
>> on i.a.o/bh .
>>
>
> From my work on Trac I know that it can be a bit difficult to keep track of
> dozens of tickets, so I appreciate that you want a way to track them.

Yes, I thought it was just a tag . However , given the fact that the
idea is not welcome I'd not like to pollute the issue tracker .

> Perhaps we can install XmlRpcPlugin once the compatibility issues have been
> resolved,

At least Bloodhound RPC (... or whatever name it might have in the
near future ...) is running in blood-hound.net for authenticated users
. All the charts in dataviz.blood-hound.net and
widgets.blood-hound.net are powered by Bloodhound RPC plugin . That's
JFTR . Recently I've been fixing issues related to timeline and report
RPC .

> which would give you a way to tag and organize your tickets on
> the client side.
>

Nevermind . If I may be granted with BATCH_MODIFY permission I'll
revert changes myself with little noise , otherwise please feel free
to revert my changes . Of course I could do it myself with some noise,
if you do not mind  .

> We'd like to get XmlRpcPlugin running again on trac-hacks for this same
> reason, I just haven't found time to work on it lately.
>

;)

-- 
Regards,

Olemis - @olemislc

Re: Introducing bhnet tag WAS: [Apache Bloodhound] #618: Parent/child updates for QCT

Posted by Olemis Lang <ol...@gmail.com>.
On 7/31/13, Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com> wrote:
> On 31.07.2013 20:00, Olemis Lang wrote:
>> Hi !
>> :)
>>
>> If you noticed a number of edits like the one shown below it's because
>> I've been tagging some of them with bhnet keyword so as to identify
>> the issues detected / reported while using/deploying blood-hound.net .
>
> I suspect that your using the Bloodhound logo the way you do may be a
> trademark violation. Please consult
>
>     http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/
>
> and trademarks@apache.org.
>

Thanks . I'll take a look asap .

>> That will allow us to find them more quickly .
>>
>> I apologize if this caused any trouble and, if there's a chance to
>> reduce the noise in te future, kindly request BATCH_MODIFY permission
>> on i.a.o/bh .
>
> You have your own issue tracker on that site.

It is unrelated to i.a.o/bh issue tracker . There's no single ticket
in there about bloodhound .

> IMO you shouldn't be
> polluting the Bloodhound tracker with your private tags in this way.
>

Anyway , if the keyword is not allowed in i.a.o/bh please fell free to
revert the changes . I'll do the necessary changes needed myself if
I'm granted with BATCH_MODIFY permission.

-- 
Regards,

Olemis - @olemislc

Re: Introducing bhnet tag WAS: [Apache Bloodhound] #618: Parent/child updates for QCT