You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@jena.apache.org by Miika Alonen <mi...@csc.fi> on 2016/01/15 13:46:33 UTC

Namespaces dropped from construct result in Fuseki 2.3.1?

Hi, 

Just wondering why Fuseki 2.3.1 returns expanded content with construct queries, for example with following query: 

PREFIX ex: <http://example.org/> 
PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> 
PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> 
CONSTRUCT { ex:Example rdfs:label "Example" . } WHERE { } 

returns expanded content with full uris when same query in 2.3.0 returned prefixed content. 

Best Regards, 
Miika Alonen 

CSC - IT Center for Science 
miika.alonen@csc.fi

Re: Namespaces dropped from construct result in Fuseki 2.3.1?

Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
On 15/01/16 20:58, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> On 15/01/16 12:46, Miika Alonen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just wondering why Fuseki 2.3.1 returns expanded content with
>> construct queries, for example with following query:
>>
>> PREFIX ex: <http://example.org/>
>> PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>
>> PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
>> CONSTRUCT { ex:Example rdfs:label "Example" . } WHERE { }
>>
>> returns expanded content with full uris when same query in 2.3.0
>> returned prefixed content.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Miika Alonen
>>
>> CSC - IT Center for Science
>> miika.alonen@csc.fi
>>
>
> Hi Miika,
>
> Not an intentional change - could you raise a JIRA please?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA
>
> Also - do you happen to know if running a CONSTRUCT query from java does
> the same? (there are two general areas this could be happening - Fuseki
> or ARQ - knowing if using the Java API shows the same would be useful
> information.)

JENA-1119
And fixed in the development build in about 1hr's time.

     Andy

>
>      Andy

Re: Namespaces dropped from construct result in Fuseki 2.3.1?

Posted by Miika Alonen <mi...@csc.fi>.
Seems that you resolved it already during the weekend. Thanks!

I havent used jira before, i guess i have to sing up :)  

- Miika

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andy Seaborne" <an...@apache.org>
To: users@jena.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 15 January, 2016 22:58:41
Subject: Re: Namespaces dropped from construct result in Fuseki 2.3.1?

On 15/01/16 12:46, Miika Alonen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just wondering why Fuseki 2.3.1 returns expanded content with construct queries, for example with following query:
>
> PREFIX ex: <http://example.org/>
> PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>
> PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
> CONSTRUCT { ex:Example rdfs:label "Example" . } WHERE { }
>
> returns expanded content with full uris when same query in 2.3.0 returned prefixed content.
>
> Best Regards,
> Miika Alonen
>
> CSC - IT Center for Science
> miika.alonen@csc.fi
>

Hi Miika,

Not an intentional change - could you raise a JIRA please?

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA

Also - do you happen to know if running a CONSTRUCT query from java does 
the same? (there are two general areas this could be happening - Fuseki 
or ARQ - knowing if using the Java API shows the same would be useful 
information.)

	Andy

Re: Namespaces dropped from construct result in Fuseki 2.3.1?

Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
On 15/01/16 12:46, Miika Alonen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just wondering why Fuseki 2.3.1 returns expanded content with construct queries, for example with following query:
>
> PREFIX ex: <http://example.org/>
> PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>
> PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
> CONSTRUCT { ex:Example rdfs:label "Example" . } WHERE { }
>
> returns expanded content with full uris when same query in 2.3.0 returned prefixed content.
>
> Best Regards,
> Miika Alonen
>
> CSC - IT Center for Science
> miika.alonen@csc.fi
>

Hi Miika,

Not an intentional change - could you raise a JIRA please?

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA

Also - do you happen to know if running a CONSTRUCT query from java does 
the same? (there are two general areas this could be happening - Fuseki 
or ARQ - knowing if using the Java API shows the same would be useful 
information.)

	Andy