You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@couchdb.apache.org by Zachary Zolton <za...@gmail.com> on 2010/07/08 04:43:50 UTC
Trying to test 1.0 artefact
Friends,
I'm having trouble running the browser tests for the 1.0 artefact...
Have I done something silly?
I'm on Mac OS X 10.6.4 with Erlang R13B04, and running via the
./utils/run script.
Here's a link to the logs from when I ran all the tests:
http://friendpaste.com/2SmffccO5aRrLcz5f1XZgV
Is there any other data I should provide?
Cheers,
Zach
Re: Trying to test 1.0 artefact
Posted by Zachary Zolton <za...@gmail.com>.
Hmm... I just did a fresh download and make dev, and all the tests ran
fine the first time.
However the second time I received this failure:
compact failure 2086ms
1. Assertion failed: db.info().disk_size < deletesize
Then a different failure the third time running all the tests:
rev_stemming error 79ms
1. Exception raised: {"error":"file_exists","reason":"The database
could not be created, the file already exists."}
FWIW, I did completely clear my browser cache, stopped my other
CouchDB 0.11 instance, and I'm now running the 1.0 artefact on port
5984.
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:58 PM, J Chris Anderson <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Jul 7, 2010, at 8:42 PM, Zachary Zolton wrote:
>
>> Sorry, if I wasn't clear enough earlier. (^w^) That log was captured
>> while running all the tests in Futon.
>>
>> I'm running the test suite in Firefox 3.6.3, and the table contains
>> the following after I run:
>> http://friendpaste.com/4v4ryhrweSu1PRifAVBMlQ
>>
>
> That does look bad.
>
> Are you sure you are running a good install of CouchDB? Just now while testing the 0.11.1 release I had a bunch of errors and it turned out I was running CouchDB 1.0 with the 0.11.1 test suite. (This can happen if you do the make install step)
>
> But since you are running using utils/run it's probably not a version mismatch.
>
> Did you run `make dev` before running utils/run?
>
> The other thing to do is to clear your browser cache.
>
> Chris
>
>> -Zach
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Robert Newson <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The test page reports "success" for each test. Some tests verify that
>>> error conditions are handled, so the log always contains some alarming
>>> error messages. Hopefully that's what happened here.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>
>>> On 7 Jul 2010, at 22:57, J Chris Anderson <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 7, 2010, at 7:43 PM, Zachary Zolton wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Friends,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm having trouble running the browser tests for the 1.0 artefact...
>>>>> Have I done something silly?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What do you mean? Are there failures when you run them?
>>>>
>>>>> I'm on Mac OS X 10.6.4 with Erlang R13B04, and running via the
>>>>> ./utils/run script.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's a link to the logs from when I ran all the tests:
>>>>> http://friendpaste.com/2SmffccO5aRrLcz5f1XZgV
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The logs look ok to me (didn't read them, but it looks like the test suite successfully finished.)
>>>>
>>>>> Is there any other data I should provide?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Zach
>>>>
>>>
>
>
Re: Trying to test 1.0 artefact
Posted by J Chris Anderson <jc...@gmail.com>.
On Jul 7, 2010, at 8:42 PM, Zachary Zolton wrote:
> Sorry, if I wasn't clear enough earlier. (^w^) That log was captured
> while running all the tests in Futon.
>
> I'm running the test suite in Firefox 3.6.3, and the table contains
> the following after I run:
> http://friendpaste.com/4v4ryhrweSu1PRifAVBMlQ
>
That does look bad.
Are you sure you are running a good install of CouchDB? Just now while testing the 0.11.1 release I had a bunch of errors and it turned out I was running CouchDB 1.0 with the 0.11.1 test suite. (This can happen if you do the make install step)
But since you are running using utils/run it's probably not a version mismatch.
Did you run `make dev` before running utils/run?
The other thing to do is to clear your browser cache.
Chris
> -Zach
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Robert Newson <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The test page reports "success" for each test. Some tests verify that
>> error conditions are handled, so the log always contains some alarming
>> error messages. Hopefully that's what happened here.
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On 7 Jul 2010, at 22:57, J Chris Anderson <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 7, 2010, at 7:43 PM, Zachary Zolton wrote:
>>>
>>>> Friends,
>>>>
>>>> I'm having trouble running the browser tests for the 1.0 artefact...
>>>> Have I done something silly?
>>>>
>>>
>>> What do you mean? Are there failures when you run them?
>>>
>>>> I'm on Mac OS X 10.6.4 with Erlang R13B04, and running via the
>>>> ./utils/run script.
>>>>
>>>> Here's a link to the logs from when I ran all the tests:
>>>> http://friendpaste.com/2SmffccO5aRrLcz5f1XZgV
>>>>
>>>
>>> The logs look ok to me (didn't read them, but it looks like the test suite successfully finished.)
>>>
>>>> Is there any other data I should provide?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Zach
>>>
>>
Re: Trying to test 1.0 artefact
Posted by Zachary Zolton <za...@gmail.com>.
Hmm... Not sure what I did earlier. I just started ./utils/run and all
the tests passed just fine!?
Sorry for the noise. Will continue testing 1.0 now.
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Zachary Zolton
<za...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry, if I wasn't clear enough earlier. (^w^) That log was captured
> while running all the tests in Futon.
>
> I'm running the test suite in Firefox 3.6.3, and the table contains
> the following after I run:
> http://friendpaste.com/4v4ryhrweSu1PRifAVBMlQ
>
> -Zach
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Robert Newson <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The test page reports "success" for each test. Some tests verify that
>> error conditions are handled, so the log always contains some alarming
>> error messages. Hopefully that's what happened here.
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On 7 Jul 2010, at 22:57, J Chris Anderson <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 7, 2010, at 7:43 PM, Zachary Zolton wrote:
>>>
>>>> Friends,
>>>>
>>>> I'm having trouble running the browser tests for the 1.0 artefact...
>>>> Have I done something silly?
>>>>
>>>
>>> What do you mean? Are there failures when you run them?
>>>
>>>> I'm on Mac OS X 10.6.4 with Erlang R13B04, and running via the
>>>> ./utils/run script.
>>>>
>>>> Here's a link to the logs from when I ran all the tests:
>>>> http://friendpaste.com/2SmffccO5aRrLcz5f1XZgV
>>>>
>>>
>>> The logs look ok to me (didn't read them, but it looks like the test suite successfully finished.)
>>>
>>>> Is there any other data I should provide?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Zach
>>>
>>
>
Re: Trying to test 1.0 artefact
Posted by Zachary Zolton <za...@gmail.com>.
Sorry, if I wasn't clear enough earlier. (^w^) That log was captured
while running all the tests in Futon.
I'm running the test suite in Firefox 3.6.3, and the table contains
the following after I run:
http://friendpaste.com/4v4ryhrweSu1PRifAVBMlQ
-Zach
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Robert Newson <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The test page reports "success" for each test. Some tests verify that
> error conditions are handled, so the log always contains some alarming
> error messages. Hopefully that's what happened here.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 7 Jul 2010, at 22:57, J Chris Anderson <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 7, 2010, at 7:43 PM, Zachary Zolton wrote:
>>
>>> Friends,
>>>
>>> I'm having trouble running the browser tests for the 1.0 artefact...
>>> Have I done something silly?
>>>
>>
>> What do you mean? Are there failures when you run them?
>>
>>> I'm on Mac OS X 10.6.4 with Erlang R13B04, and running via the
>>> ./utils/run script.
>>>
>>> Here's a link to the logs from when I ran all the tests:
>>> http://friendpaste.com/2SmffccO5aRrLcz5f1XZgV
>>>
>>
>> The logs look ok to me (didn't read them, but it looks like the test suite successfully finished.)
>>
>>> Is there any other data I should provide?
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Zach
>>
>
Re: Trying to test 1.0 artefact
Posted by Robert Newson <ro...@gmail.com>.
The test page reports "success" for each test. Some tests verify that
error conditions are handled, so the log always contains some alarming
error messages. Hopefully that's what happened here.
Sent from my iPad
On 7 Jul 2010, at 22:57, J Chris Anderson <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Jul 7, 2010, at 7:43 PM, Zachary Zolton wrote:
>
>> Friends,
>>
>> I'm having trouble running the browser tests for the 1.0 artefact...
>> Have I done something silly?
>>
>
> What do you mean? Are there failures when you run them?
>
>> I'm on Mac OS X 10.6.4 with Erlang R13B04, and running via the
>> ./utils/run script.
>>
>> Here's a link to the logs from when I ran all the tests:
>> http://friendpaste.com/2SmffccO5aRrLcz5f1XZgV
>>
>
> The logs look ok to me (didn't read them, but it looks like the test suite successfully finished.)
>
>> Is there any other data I should provide?
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Zach
>
Re: Trying to test 1.0 artefact
Posted by J Chris Anderson <jc...@gmail.com>.
On Jul 7, 2010, at 7:43 PM, Zachary Zolton wrote:
> Friends,
>
> I'm having trouble running the browser tests for the 1.0 artefact...
> Have I done something silly?
>
What do you mean? Are there failures when you run them?
> I'm on Mac OS X 10.6.4 with Erlang R13B04, and running via the
> ./utils/run script.
>
> Here's a link to the logs from when I ran all the tests:
> http://friendpaste.com/2SmffccO5aRrLcz5f1XZgV
>
The logs look ok to me (didn't read them, but it looks like the test suite successfully finished.)
> Is there any other data I should provide?
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Zach