You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to soap-dev@ws.apache.org by Scott Nichol <sn...@scottnichol.com> on 2004/04/08 03:11:43 UTC
Re: Apache license update
There is a new "nightly" release at http://cvs.apache.org/dist/soap/nightly/2004-04-07/. This has the new Apache license (finally), manifest files in soap.jar and soap.war (hurray), and a fix that trims the value in the HTTP Content-Length header.
Scott Nichol
Do not send e-mail directly to this e-mail address,
because it is filtered to accept only mail from
specific mail lists.
Re: Apache license update
Posted by Scott Nichol <sn...@scottnichol.com>.
Dirk-Willem,
Is "nightly build" an appropriate term for developer convenience snapshots? That is how the Apache SOAP web site refers to these.
Is your list of what "releases are" captured as policy somewhere on an apache.org Web page? I thought there was such a page, but I cannot find it right now. I want to be sure the next true release of Apache SOAP follows all the rules.
Thanks.
Scott Nichol
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dirk-Willem van Gulik" <di...@webweaving.org>
To: <so...@ws.apache.org>
Cc: <so...@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 4:41 AM
Subject: Re: Apache license update
On Apr 8, 2004, at 3:11 AM, Scott Nichol wrote:
> There is a new "nightly" release at
> http://cvs.apache.org/dist/soap/nightly/2004-04-07/.
Folks - a gentle nudge:- try to avoid calling those things things
'releases'.
They aint.
They are just developer convenience snapshots. Releases are:
-> official distributions of the ASF
-> have gone through an explicit peer reviewed process with
due announcement.
-> And to prove the above we have the required +1
votes of multiple commiters on file in our repository.
-> Are tagged as such in CVS so we can go back
easily should there be claims.
Whereas the tarball above is an uncontrolled snapshot to aid developers
and collaborators.
The difference is important as the ASF is on the hook for its official
releases/distributions - and in order to protect developers
from each other; and allow the ASF to protect the developers we must
show oversight and due process when creating those releases.
That aside from the fact that a significant reason for the ASFs its
market
share/popularity is the consistently high quality and predictability -
which
can directly be attributed to the fact that we do do peer review and
oversight; and that it we're not a collection of one mans shops.
Dw
--
Dirk-Willem van Gulik, President of the Apache Software Foundation.
Re: Apache license update
Posted by Scott Nichol <sn...@scottnichol.com>.
Dirk-Willem,
Is "nightly build" an appropriate term for developer convenience snapshots? That is how the Apache SOAP web site refers to these.
Is your list of what "releases are" captured as policy somewhere on an apache.org Web page? I thought there was such a page, but I cannot find it right now. I want to be sure the next true release of Apache SOAP follows all the rules.
Thanks.
Scott Nichol
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dirk-Willem van Gulik" <di...@webweaving.org>
To: <so...@ws.apache.org>
Cc: <so...@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 4:41 AM
Subject: Re: Apache license update
On Apr 8, 2004, at 3:11 AM, Scott Nichol wrote:
> There is a new "nightly" release at
> http://cvs.apache.org/dist/soap/nightly/2004-04-07/.
Folks - a gentle nudge:- try to avoid calling those things things
'releases'.
They aint.
They are just developer convenience snapshots. Releases are:
-> official distributions of the ASF
-> have gone through an explicit peer reviewed process with
due announcement.
-> And to prove the above we have the required +1
votes of multiple commiters on file in our repository.
-> Are tagged as such in CVS so we can go back
easily should there be claims.
Whereas the tarball above is an uncontrolled snapshot to aid developers
and collaborators.
The difference is important as the ASF is on the hook for its official
releases/distributions - and in order to protect developers
from each other; and allow the ASF to protect the developers we must
show oversight and due process when creating those releases.
That aside from the fact that a significant reason for the ASFs its
market
share/popularity is the consistently high quality and predictability -
which
can directly be attributed to the fact that we do do peer review and
oversight; and that it we're not a collection of one mans shops.
Dw
--
Dirk-Willem van Gulik, President of the Apache Software Foundation.
Re: Apache license update
Posted by Dirk-Willem van Gulik <di...@webweaving.org>.
On Apr 8, 2004, at 3:11 AM, Scott Nichol wrote:
> There is a new "nightly" release at
> http://cvs.apache.org/dist/soap/nightly/2004-04-07/.
Folks - a gentle nudge:- try to avoid calling those things things
'releases'.
They aint.
They are just developer convenience snapshots. Releases are:
-> official distributions of the ASF
-> have gone through an explicit peer reviewed process with
due announcement.
-> And to prove the above we have the required +1
votes of multiple commiters on file in our repository.
-> Are tagged as such in CVS so we can go back
easily should there be claims.
Whereas the tarball above is an uncontrolled snapshot to aid developers
and collaborators.
The difference is important as the ASF is on the hook for its official
releases/distributions - and in order to protect developers
from each other; and allow the ASF to protect the developers we must
show oversight and due process when creating those releases.
That aside from the fact that a significant reason for the ASFs its
market
share/popularity is the consistently high quality and predictability -
which
can directly be attributed to the fact that we do do peer review and
oversight; and that it we're not a collection of one mans shops.
Dw
--
Dirk-Willem van Gulik, President of the Apache Software Foundation.
Re: Apache license update
Posted by Dirk-Willem van Gulik <di...@webweaving.org>.
On Apr 8, 2004, at 3:11 AM, Scott Nichol wrote:
> There is a new "nightly" release at
> http://cvs.apache.org/dist/soap/nightly/2004-04-07/.
Folks - a gentle nudge:- try to avoid calling those things things
'releases'.
They aint.
They are just developer convenience snapshots. Releases are:
-> official distributions of the ASF
-> have gone through an explicit peer reviewed process with
due announcement.
-> And to prove the above we have the required +1
votes of multiple commiters on file in our repository.
-> Are tagged as such in CVS so we can go back
easily should there be claims.
Whereas the tarball above is an uncontrolled snapshot to aid developers
and collaborators.
The difference is important as the ASF is on the hook for its official
releases/distributions - and in order to protect developers
from each other; and allow the ASF to protect the developers we must
show oversight and due process when creating those releases.
That aside from the fact that a significant reason for the ASFs its
market
share/popularity is the consistently high quality and predictability -
which
can directly be attributed to the fact that we do do peer review and
oversight; and that it we're not a collection of one mans shops.
Dw
--
Dirk-Willem van Gulik, President of the Apache Software Foundation.
Error in SOAP2.3.1
Posted by jyotsna <jy...@baypackets.com>.
Hello All
I am getting the following SOAP error while sending Japanese characters :
Can't find resource for bundle java.util.PropertyResourceBundle, key
SOAP-ENV:Protocol
Can anyone please help me .
best regds
Jyotsna
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Nichol [mailto:snicholnews@scottnichol.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 6:42 AM
To: soap-user@ws.apache.org; soap-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache license update
There is a new "nightly" release at
http://cvs.apache.org/dist/soap/nightly/2004-04-07/. This has the new
Apache license (finally), manifest files in soap.jar and soap.war (hurray),
and a fix that trims the value in the HTTP Content-Length header.
Scott Nichol
Do not send e-mail directly to this e-mail address,
because it is filtered to accept only mail from
specific mail lists.