You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> on 2014/01/11 03:30:53 UTC
Re: Branch 0.98 update and soft freeze
I have test failures on 0.98 branch down to maybe one, which I hope to fix
soon, and roll RC0 of 0.98.0 this weekend. So this is almost over. Your
patience and understanding is appreciated. Ping me before committing to
0.98 branch, please. Thanks.
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> Happy holidays all.
>
> As of today, there are 12 issues remaining with a fix version of 0.98.0.
> Before cutting a RC I plan on addressing HBASE-6873, HBASE-9941,
> HBASE-9945, and maybe HBASE-9845. My understanding is others are working on
> HBASE-7781, HBASE-9681, HBASE-9846, HBASE-9858, HBASE-10221, and
> HBASE-10228. There are a couple others. Let's see what we can get done by
> the end of the month.
>
> On trunk and 0.98 a number of unit tests are acting flaky lately on
> builds.apache.org and my private Jenkins. No time like the present to get
> started on fixing them.
>
> Accordingly, please, no more commits to 0.98 branch without getting an ack
> from me first.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: Branch 0.98 update and soft freeze
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
I have integrated HBASE-10329 to 0.98 and trunk.
Thanks
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I think HBASE-10329 should be included in 0.98.0 RC0.
>
>
> See my comment on the issue. :-)
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
Re: Branch 0.98 update and soft freeze
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think HBASE-10329 should be included in 0.98.0 RC0.
See my comment on the issue. :-)
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: Branch 0.98 update and soft freeze
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
Andy:
I think HBASE-10329 should be included in 0.98.0 RC0.
Cheers
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>wrote:
> Yes, as long as we keep filing blockers there won't be any RC.
>
> On Sunday, January 12, 2014, Stack wrote:
>
> > HBASE-10321 should be done before RC I'd say.
> > Sounds good Andrew,
> > St.Ack
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > I am just about ready to tag the 0.98.0RC and release the branch. There
> > are
> > > two items left that are a must I feel:
> > > - HBASE-6873, which I will get to at the next opportunity
> > > - An issue with insuring tags are not inappropriately sent back to
> > > unprivileged users, which Ram and Anoop have been discussing here, and
> I
> > > think Anoop will post a JIRA and patch for soon.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have test failures on 0.98 branch down to maybe one, which I hope
> to
> > > fix
> > > > soon, and roll RC0 of 0.98.0 this weekend. So this is almost over.
> Your
> > > > patience and understanding is appreciated. Ping me before committing
> to
> > > > 0.98 branch, please. Thanks.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Happy holidays all.
> > > >>
> > > >> As of today, there are 12 issues remaining with a fix version of
> > 0.98.0.
> > > >> Before cutting a RC I plan on addressing HBASE-6873, HBASE-9941,
> > > >> HBASE-9945, and maybe HBASE-9845. My understanding is others are
> > > working on
> > > >> HBASE-7781, HBASE-9681, HBASE-9846, HBASE-9858, HBASE-10221, and
> > > >> HBASE-10228. There are a couple others. Let's see what we can get
> done
> > > by
> > > >> the end of the month.
> > > >>
> > > >> On trunk and 0.98 a number of unit tests are acting flaky lately on
> > > >> builds.apache.org and my private Jenkins. No time like the present
> to
> > > >> get started on fixing them.
> > > >>
> > > >> Accordingly, please, no more commits to 0.98 branch without getting
> an
> > > >> ack from me first.
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Best regards,
> > > >>
> > > >> - Andy
> > > >>
> > > >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > Hein
> > > >> (via Tom White)
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > > - Andy
> > > >
> > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > Hein
> > > > (via Tom White)
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > - Andy
> > >
> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > > (via Tom White)
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
Re: Branch 0.98 update and soft freeze
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
Andy:
I performed a search for 'Fix Version' being 0.98.0 and got results back
quickly.
Looks like JIRA is back up.
FYI
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> Yep JIRA's indexes are still broken, searches for 'fix version' etc are
> returning 500s. Until tomorrow.
>
> On Wednesday, January 22, 2014, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > JIRA has been unavailable or throwing 503s for a few hours now. This will
> > have to wait one day.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> >wrote:
> >
> > That test failure was not reproducible on my build boxes.
> >
> > Last call for commits that already have a +1 for 0.98 branch, I am
> tagging
> > RC0 around midnight tonight Pacific time.
> >
> > After that please consider the "soft freeze" over and done, my earlier
> > request complete. I still reserve the right to revert inappropriate
> commits
> > to 0.98 branch as RM, so it would be good to check first on changes that
> > are new features or may be controversial.
> >
> >
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
Re: Branch 0.98 update and soft freeze
Posted by Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for asking Ted. It was lifted back when RC0 was tagged. Appreciate your cooperation.
> On Feb 10, 2014, at 4:56 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Andrew:
> Please confirm when the soft freeze would be lifted - after RC2 passes ?
>
> Cheers
>
>
>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Yes seems so. I've removed the RC0 tag. Let's get this one in.
>>
>>> On Friday, January 24, 2014, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Andy:
>>> Looks like HBASE-10412 should be included in RC0
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> On Jan 23, 2014, at 10:21 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
>> <javascript:;>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This was a local issue involving installing the wrong JRE bits into the
>>>> wrong location.
>>>>
>>>> Several builds with Oracle JDK 7u45 have passed cleanly.
>>>>
>>>> 0.98.0RC tagged!
>>>>
>>>> I'll spin the bits tomorrow.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
>> <javascript:;>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This isn't going to happen today either. I am tracking down why some
>>> tests
>>>>> for the hbase-server module leave multiple surefire runners hanging
>>> around.
>>>>> Really weird stuff,
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> - Andy
>>>>
>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
>> Hein
>>>> (via Tom White)
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>
>> - Andy
>>
>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>> (via Tom White)
>>
Re: Branch 0.98 update and soft freeze
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
Andrew:
Please confirm when the soft freeze would be lifted - after RC2 passes ?
Cheers
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> Yes seems so. I've removed the RC0 tag. Let's get this one in.
>
> On Friday, January 24, 2014, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Andy:
> > Looks like HBASE-10412 should be included in RC0
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > On Jan 23, 2014, at 10:21 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > This was a local issue involving installing the wrong JRE bits into the
> > > wrong location.
> > >
> > > Several builds with Oracle JDK 7u45 have passed cleanly.
> > >
> > > 0.98.0RC tagged!
> > >
> > > I'll spin the bits tomorrow.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> This isn't going to happen today either. I am tracking down why some
> > tests
> > >> for the hbase-server module leave multiple surefire runners hanging
> > around.
> > >> Really weird stuff,
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > - Andy
> > >
> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > > (via Tom White)
> >
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
Re: Branch 0.98 update and soft freeze
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> Yes seems so. I've removed the RC0 tag. Let's get this one in.
All quiet. Set the 0.98.0RC0 tag again.
Will spin bits tomorrow.
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: Branch 0.98 update and soft freeze
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
Yes seems so. I've removed the RC0 tag. Let's get this one in.
On Friday, January 24, 2014, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Andy:
> Looks like HBASE-10412 should be included in RC0
>
> Cheers
>
> On Jan 23, 2014, at 10:21 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > This was a local issue involving installing the wrong JRE bits into the
> > wrong location.
> >
> > Several builds with Oracle JDK 7u45 have passed cleanly.
> >
> > 0.98.0RC tagged!
> >
> > I'll spin the bits tomorrow.
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> >
> >> This isn't going to happen today either. I am tracking down why some
> tests
> >> for the hbase-server module leave multiple surefire runners hanging
> around.
> >> Really weird stuff,
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: Branch 0.98 update and soft freeze
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
Andy:
Looks like HBASE-10412 should be included in RC0
Cheers
On Jan 23, 2014, at 10:21 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> This was a local issue involving installing the wrong JRE bits into the
> wrong location.
>
> Several builds with Oracle JDK 7u45 have passed cleanly.
>
> 0.98.0RC tagged!
>
> I'll spin the bits tomorrow.
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> This isn't going to happen today either. I am tracking down why some tests
>> for the hbase-server module leave multiple surefire runners hanging around.
>> Really weird stuff,
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
Re: Branch 0.98 update and soft freeze
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
This was a local issue involving installing the wrong JRE bits into the
wrong location.
Several builds with Oracle JDK 7u45 have passed cleanly.
0.98.0RC tagged!
I'll spin the bits tomorrow.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> This isn't going to happen today either. I am tracking down why some tests
> for the hbase-server module leave multiple surefire runners hanging around.
> Really weird stuff,
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: Branch 0.98 update and soft freeze
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
This isn't going to happen today either. I am tracking down why some tests
for the hbase-server module leave multiple surefire runners hanging around.
Really weird stuff, ClockOutOfSyncExceptions yet I checked and my system
clock is only drifting a handful of milliseconds from NTP pool time at any
given moment.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> JIRA is back. Tonight around midnight PST (crosses fingers, going to be
> hard to get work done today in that state)
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>wrote:
>
>> Yep JIRA's indexes are still broken, searches for 'fix version' etc are
>> returning 500s. Until tomorrow.
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, January 22, 2014, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> JIRA has been unavailable or throwing 503s for a few hours now. This
>>> will have to wait one day.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>wrote:
>>>
>>> That test failure was not reproducible on my build boxes.
>>>
>>> Last call for commits that already have a +1 for 0.98 branch, I am
>>> tagging RC0 around midnight tonight Pacific time.
>>>
>>> After that please consider the "soft freeze" over and done, my earlier
>>> request complete. I still reserve the right to revert inappropriate commits
>>> to 0.98 branch as RM, so it would be good to check first on changes that
>>> are new features or may be controversial.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>
>> - Andy
>>
>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>> (via Tom White)
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: Branch 0.98 update and soft freeze
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
JIRA is back. Tonight around midnight PST (crosses fingers, going to be
hard to get work done today in that state)
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> Yep JIRA's indexes are still broken, searches for 'fix version' etc are
> returning 500s. Until tomorrow.
>
>
> On Wednesday, January 22, 2014, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> JIRA has been unavailable or throwing 503s for a few hours now. This will
>> have to wait one day.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>wrote:
>>
>> That test failure was not reproducible on my build boxes.
>>
>> Last call for commits that already have a +1 for 0.98 branch, I am
>> tagging RC0 around midnight tonight Pacific time.
>>
>> After that please consider the "soft freeze" over and done, my earlier
>> request complete. I still reserve the right to revert inappropriate commits
>> to 0.98 branch as RM, so it would be good to check first on changes that
>> are new features or may be controversial.
>>
>>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: Branch 0.98 update and soft freeze
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
Yep JIRA's indexes are still broken, searches for 'fix version' etc are
returning 500s. Until tomorrow.
On Wednesday, January 22, 2014, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> JIRA has been unavailable or throwing 503s for a few hours now. This will
> have to wait one day.
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>wrote:
>
> That test failure was not reproducible on my build boxes.
>
> Last call for commits that already have a +1 for 0.98 branch, I am tagging
> RC0 around midnight tonight Pacific time.
>
> After that please consider the "soft freeze" over and done, my earlier
> request complete. I still reserve the right to revert inappropriate commits
> to 0.98 branch as RM, so it would be good to check first on changes that
> are new features or may be controversial.
>
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: Branch 0.98 update and soft freeze
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
JIRA has been unavailable or throwing 503s for a few hours now. This will
have to wait one day.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> That test failure was not reproducible on my build boxes.
>
> Last call for commits that already have a +1 for 0.98 branch, I am tagging
> RC0 around midnight tonight Pacific time.
>
> After that please consider the "soft freeze" over and done, my earlier
> request complete. I still reserve the right to revert inappropriate commits
> to 0.98 branch as RM, so it would be good to check first on changes that
> are new features or may be controversial.
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>wrote:
>
>> There is also a suspicious failure in
>> https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.98/100/ that I'm now looking into.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>wrote:
>>
>>> I apologize for the delay in tagging the 0.98.0 RC. There is one
>>> outstanding blocker - HBASE-10322. I think we have rounded the curve and
>>> are headed home on it. In the meantime holding up the RC has been a net
>>> positive I think, we've had issues come up like HBASE-10384 and the
>>> opportunity to get them into the RC. In addition I've had time to fix some
>>> lingering coprocessor related issues.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, as long as we keep filing blockers there won't be any RC.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sunday, January 12, 2014, Stack wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> HBASE-10321 should be done before RC I'd say.
>>>>> Sounds good Andrew,
>>>>> St.Ack
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
>>>>> >wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > I am just about ready to tag the 0.98.0RC and release the branch.
>>>>> There are
>>>>> > two items left that are a must I feel:
>>>>> > - HBASE-6873, which I will get to at the next opportunity
>>>>> > - An issue with insuring tags are not inappropriately sent back to
>>>>> > unprivileged users, which Ram and Anoop have been discussing here,
>>>>> and I
>>>>> > think Anoop will post a JIRA and patch for soon.
>>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> - Andy
>>>
>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>>> (via Tom White)
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>
>> - Andy
>>
>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>> (via Tom White)
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: Branch 0.98 update and soft freeze
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
That test failure was not reproducible on my build boxes.
Last call for commits that already have a +1 for 0.98 branch, I am tagging
RC0 around midnight tonight Pacific time.
After that please consider the "soft freeze" over and done, my earlier
request complete. I still reserve the right to revert inappropriate commits
to 0.98 branch as RM, so it would be good to check first on changes that
are new features or may be controversial.
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> There is also a suspicious failure in
> https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.98/100/ that I'm now looking into.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>wrote:
>
>> I apologize for the delay in tagging the 0.98.0 RC. There is one
>> outstanding blocker - HBASE-10322. I think we have rounded the curve and
>> are headed home on it. In the meantime holding up the RC has been a net
>> positive I think, we've had issues come up like HBASE-10384 and the
>> opportunity to get them into the RC. In addition I've had time to fix some
>> lingering coprocessor related issues.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, as long as we keep filing blockers there won't be any RC.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sunday, January 12, 2014, Stack wrote:
>>>
>>>> HBASE-10321 should be done before RC I'd say.
>>>> Sounds good Andrew,
>>>> St.Ack
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
>>>> >wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > I am just about ready to tag the 0.98.0RC and release the branch.
>>>> There are
>>>> > two items left that are a must I feel:
>>>> > - HBASE-6873, which I will get to at the next opportunity
>>>> > - An issue with insuring tags are not inappropriately sent back to
>>>> > unprivileged users, which Ram and Anoop have been discussing here,
>>>> and I
>>>> > think Anoop will post a JIRA and patch for soon.
>>>> >
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>
>> - Andy
>>
>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>> (via Tom White)
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: Branch 0.98 update and soft freeze
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
There is also a suspicious failure in
https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.98/100/ that I'm now looking into.
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> I apologize for the delay in tagging the 0.98.0 RC. There is one
> outstanding blocker - HBASE-10322. I think we have rounded the curve and
> are headed home on it. In the meantime holding up the RC has been a net
> positive I think, we've had issues come up like HBASE-10384 and the
> opportunity to get them into the RC. In addition I've had time to fix some
> lingering coprocessor related issues.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>wrote:
>
>> Yes, as long as we keep filing blockers there won't be any RC.
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, January 12, 2014, Stack wrote:
>>
>>> HBASE-10321 should be done before RC I'd say.
>>> Sounds good Andrew,
>>> St.Ack
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
>>> >wrote:
>>>
>>> > I am just about ready to tag the 0.98.0RC and release the branch.
>>> There are
>>> > two items left that are a must I feel:
>>> > - HBASE-6873, which I will get to at the next opportunity
>>> > - An issue with insuring tags are not inappropriately sent back to
>>> > unprivileged users, which Ram and Anoop have been discussing here, and
>>> I
>>> > think Anoop will post a JIRA and patch for soon.
>>> >
>>
>>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: Branch 0.98 update and soft freeze
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
I apologize for the delay in tagging the 0.98.0 RC. There is one
outstanding blocker - HBASE-10322. I think we have rounded the curve and
are headed home on it. In the meantime holding up the RC has been a net
positive I think, we've had issues come up like HBASE-10384 and the
opportunity to get them into the RC. In addition I've had time to fix some
lingering coprocessor related issues.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>wrote:
> Yes, as long as we keep filing blockers there won't be any RC.
>
>
> On Sunday, January 12, 2014, Stack wrote:
>
>> HBASE-10321 should be done before RC I'd say.
>> Sounds good Andrew,
>> St.Ack
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > I am just about ready to tag the 0.98.0RC and release the branch. There
>> are
>> > two items left that are a must I feel:
>> > - HBASE-6873, which I will get to at the next opportunity
>> > - An issue with insuring tags are not inappropriately sent back to
>> > unprivileged users, which Ram and Anoop have been discussing here, and I
>> > think Anoop will post a JIRA and patch for soon.
>> >
>
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: Branch 0.98 update and soft freeze
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
Yes, as long as we keep filing blockers there won't be any RC.
On Sunday, January 12, 2014, Stack wrote:
> HBASE-10321 should be done before RC I'd say.
> Sounds good Andrew,
> St.Ack
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org<javascript:;>
> >wrote:
>
> > I am just about ready to tag the 0.98.0RC and release the branch. There
> are
> > two items left that are a must I feel:
> > - HBASE-6873, which I will get to at the next opportunity
> > - An issue with insuring tags are not inappropriately sent back to
> > unprivileged users, which Ram and Anoop have been discussing here, and I
> > think Anoop will post a JIRA and patch for soon.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org<javascript:;>
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I have test failures on 0.98 branch down to maybe one, which I hope to
> > fix
> > > soon, and roll RC0 of 0.98.0 this weekend. So this is almost over. Your
> > > patience and understanding is appreciated. Ping me before committing to
> > > 0.98 branch, please. Thanks.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org<javascript:;>
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> Happy holidays all.
> > >>
> > >> As of today, there are 12 issues remaining with a fix version of
> 0.98.0.
> > >> Before cutting a RC I plan on addressing HBASE-6873, HBASE-9941,
> > >> HBASE-9945, and maybe HBASE-9845. My understanding is others are
> > working on
> > >> HBASE-7781, HBASE-9681, HBASE-9846, HBASE-9858, HBASE-10221, and
> > >> HBASE-10228. There are a couple others. Let's see what we can get done
> > by
> > >> the end of the month.
> > >>
> > >> On trunk and 0.98 a number of unit tests are acting flaky lately on
> > >> builds.apache.org and my private Jenkins. No time like the present to
> > >> get started on fixing them.
> > >>
> > >> Accordingly, please, no more commits to 0.98 branch without getting an
> > >> ack from me first.
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Best regards,
> > >>
> > >> - Andy
> > >>
> > >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > >> (via Tom White)
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > - Andy
> > >
> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > > (via Tom White)
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: Branch 0.98 update and soft freeze
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
HBASE-10321 should be done before RC I'd say.
Sounds good Andrew,
St.Ack
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>wrote:
> I am just about ready to tag the 0.98.0RC and release the branch. There are
> two items left that are a must I feel:
> - HBASE-6873, which I will get to at the next opportunity
> - An issue with insuring tags are not inappropriately sent back to
> unprivileged users, which Ram and Anoop have been discussing here, and I
> think Anoop will post a JIRA and patch for soon.
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I have test failures on 0.98 branch down to maybe one, which I hope to
> fix
> > soon, and roll RC0 of 0.98.0 this weekend. So this is almost over. Your
> > patience and understanding is appreciated. Ping me before committing to
> > 0.98 branch, please. Thanks.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Happy holidays all.
> >>
> >> As of today, there are 12 issues remaining with a fix version of 0.98.0.
> >> Before cutting a RC I plan on addressing HBASE-6873, HBASE-9941,
> >> HBASE-9945, and maybe HBASE-9845. My understanding is others are
> working on
> >> HBASE-7781, HBASE-9681, HBASE-9846, HBASE-9858, HBASE-10221, and
> >> HBASE-10228. There are a couple others. Let's see what we can get done
> by
> >> the end of the month.
> >>
> >> On trunk and 0.98 a number of unit tests are acting flaky lately on
> >> builds.apache.org and my private Jenkins. No time like the present to
> >> get started on fixing them.
> >>
> >> Accordingly, please, no more commits to 0.98 branch without getting an
> >> ack from me first.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >> - Andy
> >>
> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> >> (via Tom White)
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
Re: Branch 0.98 update and soft freeze
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
I am just about ready to tag the 0.98.0RC and release the branch. There are
two items left that are a must I feel:
- HBASE-6873, which I will get to at the next opportunity
- An issue with insuring tags are not inappropriately sent back to
unprivileged users, which Ram and Anoop have been discussing here, and I
think Anoop will post a JIRA and patch for soon.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> I have test failures on 0.98 branch down to maybe one, which I hope to fix
> soon, and roll RC0 of 0.98.0 this weekend. So this is almost over. Your
> patience and understanding is appreciated. Ping me before committing to
> 0.98 branch, please. Thanks.
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>wrote:
>
>> Happy holidays all.
>>
>> As of today, there are 12 issues remaining with a fix version of 0.98.0.
>> Before cutting a RC I plan on addressing HBASE-6873, HBASE-9941,
>> HBASE-9945, and maybe HBASE-9845. My understanding is others are working on
>> HBASE-7781, HBASE-9681, HBASE-9846, HBASE-9858, HBASE-10221, and
>> HBASE-10228. There are a couple others. Let's see what we can get done by
>> the end of the month.
>>
>> On trunk and 0.98 a number of unit tests are acting flaky lately on
>> builds.apache.org and my private Jenkins. No time like the present to
>> get started on fixing them.
>>
>> Accordingly, please, no more commits to 0.98 branch without getting an
>> ack from me first.
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>
>> - Andy
>>
>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>> (via Tom White)
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)