Re: [VOTE] mod_proxy in?

[Chuck Murcko <ch...@topsail.org>]

And we find people to help out with the binary distrib. This would be 
the logical place to troll for takers.

Chuck

On Thursday, April 19, 2001, at 03:48 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:

> Chuck Murcko wrote:
>
>> c) Treating mod_proxy maintenance as NOT tied to httpd, mod_proxy
>> development as running on its own release cycle, mod_proxy code has its
>> own cvs module (hey, we can start module-2.1 now, right), and is
>> released with httpd distribution. Note that this may require some
>> reintegration at each httpd release (and more work than b).
>
> ie exactly like APR and APR-util.
>
> I like this one - hacking at the proxy does not spoil things for httpd,
> the the httpd people get to have a builtin proxy without any extra work
> on their part.
>
> All that remains is that the maintainers of proxy check in a stable
> version of proxy into httpd when new features become stable, or bugfixes
> are found.
>
> Regards,
> Graham
> --
> -----------------------------------------
> minfrin@sharp.fm		"There's a moon
> 					over Bourbon Street
> 						tonight..."
>

Chuck Murcko
Topsail Group
http://www.topsail.org/