You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@mynewt.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2018/11/16 10:41:22 UTC

[GitHub] mkiiskila commented on issue #1516: add bluepill stm32f103c8 support

mkiiskila commented on issue #1516: add bluepill stm32f103c8 support
URL: https://github.com/apache/mynewt-core/pull/1516#issuecomment-439354209
 
 
   In theory you could make the hal_conf.h setting be dependent on the BSP config options. In practice, it's going to create a lot of messy code, and probably not that useful (i.e what Fabio said :).
   In general, people would have their own BSP for the thing they're building, and they'd enable exactly the things they'd need for their board.
   
   That being said, I can see why you would want to do the hal_conf.h dependent on the config options for this particular board. It is severely limited in size, and people would want to use the same BSP for different projects of theirs. So I think it would be reasonable to do that for this particular board. What do you think Fabio?

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services