You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@gump.apache.org by Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org> on 2004/12/12 07:41:05 UTC
Re: Nagging
On Sunday 12 December 2004 04:40, Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
> > all because dependencies have failed to build, but no nags on projects
>
> that
>
> > actually failed, such as;
>
> Yes, indeed. Could you forward a few (or all) of them to me, P2P please?
done. don't think you want them all.
:o)
cheers
niclas
--
+------//-------------------+
/ http://www.dpml.net /
/ http://niclas.hedhman.org /
+------//-------------------+
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@gump.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@gump.apache.org
Re: Nagging
Posted by "Adam R. B. Jack" <aj...@apache.org>.
> On Sunday 12 December 2004 04:40, Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
> > > all because dependencies have failed to build, but no nags on projects
> > that
> > > actually failed, such as;
> >
> > Yes, indeed. Could you forward a few (or all) of them to me, P2P please?
>
> done. don't think you want them all.
I just switched off e-mail from public Gump, 'cos I didn't have time to
investigate the craziness, and then I took a quick peek at these mails. I
see "configuration failed" and "pre-build failed" which are both correct
messages to send. The "pre-build failed" means things like making
directories, etc, it does not mean pre-requisites failed (as I believe you
interpreted.) Does this explain all the mails you saw?
BTW: After the first notification of failure we only send notification of
failures once a day (during the official run). Could this explain your "no
nags on projects that actually failed?"
regards,
Adam
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@gump.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@gump.apache.org