You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by "Anita Kulshreshtha (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2006/11/30 18:22:21 UTC
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2607) GoperationInfo should include the
return type for the operation
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2607?page=all ]
Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-2607:
-----------------------------------------
Attachment: kernel.diff
I am attaching a patch for initial feedback. Are there any objections to this kind of modification? The changes are working. In addtion to this the tests need to be fixed to not use the old classes. Is there a better way of accomplishing the same?
> GoperationInfo should include the return type for the operation
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-2607
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2607
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: kernel
> Affects Versions: 2.0
> Environment: All
> Reporter: Anita Kulshreshtha
> Assigned To: Anita Kulshreshtha
> Attachments: kernel.diff
>
>
> When the operations are viewed by jconsole the return type is not avaialble. GOpeartionInfo should keep the retrunType information.
> This will break backward compatibility of GBeanInfo.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira