[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6351) change PrefixCodedTerms.iterator to java.util.Iterator

["Michael McCandless (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14352301#comment-14352301 ] 

Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-6351:
--------------------------------------------

Sorry, I agree this got a lot worse with LUCENE-6161.

But I already opened LUCENE-6315 to simplify PrefixCodedTerms by cutting over to BytesRefIterator.  I think that's a good step?

With Iterator<Term> I didn't like that we had to do a field.equals() every time.  The vast majority of delete-by-term in Lucene is against a single "unique identifier" field.

> change PrefixCodedTerms.iterator to java.util.Iterator
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-6351
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6351
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>
> The current api is horrible... no performance advantage can justify this.
> We should use java.util.iterator like before again.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org