You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org by Stefan Weber <we...@sitewaerts.de> on 2002/08/07 19:37:09 UTC

Font problems in 0.20.2

Hi,

does anybody know about problems embedding fonts in version 0.20.2 ?

Everthing seems to be ok ("setting up fonts" Message), but in the Document
appear only #`s.
Did anything changed in Font handling since 0.18 ?

Thanks in advance

Stefan


--
Stefan Weber
Tel: +49 (721) 920 918 26
mailto:weber@sitewaerts.de

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
sitewaerts GmbH
Hebelstraße 15
D-76133 Karlsruhe

Tel: +49 (721) 920 918 0
Fax: +49 (721) 920 918 29
http://www.sitewaerts.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


Der Inhalt dieser E-Mail ist vertraulich und ausschließlich für den
bezeichneten Adressaten bestimmt. Wenn Sie nicht der vorgesehene Adressat
dieser E-Mail oder dessen Vertreter sein sollten, so beachten Sie bitte, daß
jede Form der Kenntnisnahme, Veröffentlichung, Vervielfältigung oder
Weitergabe des Inhalts dieser E-Mail unzulässig ist. Wir bitten Sie, sich in
diesem Fall mit dem Absender der E-Mail in Verbindung zu setzen. Aussagen
gegenüber dem Adressaten unterliegen den Regelungen des zugrundeliegenden
Angebotes bzw. Auftrags, insbesondere den Allgemeinen Auftragsbedingungen
und der individuellen Haftungsvereinbarung. Der Inhalt der E-Mail ist nur
rechtsverbindlich, wenn er unsererseits durch einen Brief entsprechend
bestätigt wird.



Re: Font problems in 0.20.2

Posted by Jeremias Maerki <de...@greenmail.ch>.
I don't know exactly if the change was already in 0.20.2, but yes, there
was a change in font handling in the past. For special characters like
the Euro character or Dingbats, you need to use the Unicode values
instead of the values specified in the encoding. That's what's probably
bugging you.

But 0.20.2 is already a relatively old version. I suggest you upgrade to
0.20.4.

Can you please compare your XSLT/FO code with the FO samples in
docs/examples/fo, especially fonts.fo, which demonstrates how to make a
certain glyph appear?

Do you mean, you have ONLY #s or are there also characters that display
correctly? Maybe you have to regenerate your XML font metric files for
the new version.

I hope this helps in some way. If not, please get back.

On 07.08.2002 19:37:09 Stefan Weber wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> does anybody know about problems embedding fonts in version 0.20.2 ?
> 
> Everthing seems to be ok ("setting up fonts" Message), but in the Document
> appear only #`s.
> Did anything changed in Font handling since 0.18 ?

Jeremias Maerki


Unwanted space before inline (was: Re: Font Problems in 0.20.3)

Posted by Jeremias Maerki <de...@greenmail.ch>.
I'd REALLY appreciate if people would ONLY press the Reply button if
they are REALLY REPLYING to a message. At least you could change the
subject. This makes it much easier to find a particular mail later. Thank
you!

I think this is a bug that has been reported before. It's probably this
bug:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7259

Sorry not to be more of a help at the moment.


On 07.08.2002 20:02:07 Jon Kofal wrote:
> I do this :
> 
> <fo:block font-size="42{$fontUnits}" font-family="MyFont"
> white-space-collapse="true">a<fo:inline
> color="red">b</fo:inline></fo:block>
> 
> and my output is (with a red 'b', like I need, but with white-space
> between the characters.
> 
> a b
> 
> I do this:
> <fo:block font-size="42{$fontUnits}" font-family="MyFont"
> white-space-collapse="true">ab</fo:block>
> 
> and my output is:
> 
> ab
> 
> like I need it to be.
> 
> Anyone have a clue?


Jeremias Maerki


Font Problems in 0.20.3

Posted by Jon Kofal <jo...@yahoo.com>.
I do this :

<fo:block font-size="42{$fontUnits}" font-family="MyFont"
white-space-collapse="true">a<fo:inline
color="red">b</fo:inline></fo:block>

and my output is (with a red 'b', like I need, but with white-space
between the characters.

a b

I do this:
<fo:block font-size="42{$fontUnits}" font-family="MyFont"
white-space-collapse="true">ab</fo:block>

and my output is:

ab

like I need it to be.

Anyone have a clue?

Thanks,
Jon K

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com