You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@httpd.apache.org by Ra...@seagate.com on 2006/11/22 21:19:05 UTC
[users@httpd] Comparing Apache HTTP server 1.3 vs 2.0.*
I was looking for articles/notes on comparing the HTTP server performance
between the 1.3 and 2.0.* releases. The application that we plan on hosting
will use the Apache HTTP server to forward requests to a Weblogic Server
cluster using the WLS plugin - all running on RHEL. The static component
that would be served by the Apache HTTP server would be minimal.
Thanks
Ramdas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Comparing Apache HTTP server 1.3 vs 2.0.*
Posted by Ra...@seagate.com.
Joshua,
Thanks. I think what you mention makes sense - but i still wanted to make
sure i was not missing anything major before going down the 2.0.* path. My
initial plan was to look at the 2.2.* release but based on some initial
configuration that i tried, the WLS plugin which is part of WLS 9.2 is not
compatible with the 2.2.* release.
Thanks
Ramdas
"Joshua Slive"
<jo...@slive.ca>
Sent by: To
jslive@gmail.com users@httpd.apache.org
No Phone Info cc
Available
Subject
Re: [users@httpd] Comparing Apache
11/22/2006 12:47 HTTP server 1.3 vs 2.0.*
PM
Please respond to
users@httpd.apach
e.org
On 11/22/06, Ramdas.Hegde@seagate.com <Ra...@seagate.com> wrote:
>
> I was looking for articles/notes on comparing the HTTP server
performance
> between the 1.3 and 2.0.* releases. The application that we plan on
hosting
> will use the Apache HTTP server to forward requests to a Weblogic Server
> cluster using the WLS plugin - all running on RHEL. The static component
> that would be served by the Apache HTTP server would be minimal.
I don't think you'll find much useful info on that question. The
performance of the two would probably be very similar under those
conditions, although the specifics of the setup can always make a
difference.
The real question you should be asking yourself is if you really want
to start a project with a server that hasn't had any serious
development work in over 5 years. If so, I hope you don't need IPv6,
caching, threading, sendfile, filtering, largefile support, accept
filters, or any of the thousands of other improvements that have gone
into the 2.x series.
Joshua.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Comparing Apache HTTP server 1.3 vs 2.0.*
Posted by Joshua Slive <jo...@slive.ca>.
On 11/22/06, Ramdas.Hegde@seagate.com <Ra...@seagate.com> wrote:
>
> I was looking for articles/notes on comparing the HTTP server performance
> between the 1.3 and 2.0.* releases. The application that we plan on hosting
> will use the Apache HTTP server to forward requests to a Weblogic Server
> cluster using the WLS plugin - all running on RHEL. The static component
> that would be served by the Apache HTTP server would be minimal.
I don't think you'll find much useful info on that question. The
performance of the two would probably be very similar under those
conditions, although the specifics of the setup can always make a
difference.
The real question you should be asking yourself is if you really want
to start a project with a server that hasn't had any serious
development work in over 5 years. If so, I hope you don't need IPv6,
caching, threading, sendfile, filtering, largefile support, accept
filters, or any of the thousands of other improvements that have gone
into the 2.x series.
Joshua.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org