You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to github@arrow.apache.org by "conbench-apache-arrow[bot] (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/08/26 18:49:06 UTC

[GitHub] [arrow] conbench-apache-arrow[bot] commented on pull request #37385: GH-37384: [R] Set _R_CHECK_STOP_ON_INVALID_NUMERIC_VERSION_INPUTS_ = TRUE on CI

conbench-apache-arrow[bot] commented on PR #37385:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/37385#issuecomment-1694479816

   After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 6 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit c079dac1bb112c21e2721008d845b90e6bba94f4.
   
   There were 3 benchmark results indicating a performance regression:
   
   - Commit Run on `ursa-i9-9960x` at [2023-08-25 20:07:06Z](http://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/runs/6f492a163c6b46a4b03b3b127596202b...a4f7d9410de0436f8ea3375dd8ccc693/)
     - [`tpch` (R) with engine=arrow, format=parquet, language=R, memory_map=False, query_id=TPCH-02, scale_factor=1](http://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/benchmarks/064e8f5272017c0c8000702dfd48ed08...064e925544f5732e800076338f4b842f)
     - [`tpch` (R) with engine=arrow, format=parquet, language=R, memory_map=False, query_id=TPCH-03, scale_factor=1](http://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/benchmarks/064e8f56abb67d248000eb3204248cff...064e925ad1b678318000331eececa540)
   - and 1 more (see the report linked below)
   
   The [full Conbench report](https://github.com/apache/arrow/runs/16239583576) has more details. It also includes information about possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@arrow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org