You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@avalon.apache.org by Leo Simons <le...@apache.org> on 2002/07/01 08:27:43 UTC
'personal attacks' revisited (Re: One Container Revisited)
> The reason Avalon is complex is that committers get a great deal of
> personal satisfaction from making it complex. The only thing that could
> be better would be to make it even more complex. Wait ! Here's a new
> feature with 3 new permutations. Let's add that too! No, let's start a
> whole new container. That's the ticket! Or should it be 3, one for each
> permutation? Hmm.
please. Don't.
- Leo
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: 'personal attacks' revisited (Re: One Container Revisited)
Posted by Nicola Ken Barozzi <ni...@apache.org>.
Leo Simons wrote:
>>The reason Avalon is complex is that committers get a great deal of
>>personal satisfaction from making it complex. The only thing that could
>>be better would be to make it even more complex. Wait ! Here's a new
>>feature with 3 new permutations. Let's add that too! No, let's start a
>>whole new container. That's the ticket! Or should it be 3, one for each
>>permutation? Hmm.
>
>
> please. Don't.
please. *Don't*.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi nicolaken@apache.org
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>