You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@esme.apache.org by Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> on 2010/02/17 20:14:03 UTC
Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of apache-esme-incubating-1.0 - (Yes
Again :->)
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have posted our candidate for the first Apache release developed
> within the ESME podling.
>
> The candidate can be found at
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rhirsch/esme/
>
> See the CHANGES.txt file for details on release contents. The release
> candidate is a tar archive of the sources in
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/esme/tags/apache-esme-1-0-0-incubating/
The URL behind this element is incorrect if displayed in rich
formatting: it should be
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/esme/tags/apache-esme-1-0-0-incubating/
. Another reason to use text-only when writing emails.
>
> The MD5 checksum of the apache-esme-incubating-1.0-
> src.tar.gz release package is
>
> 8E 43 0D DF F8 FE 15 9B 22 47 C2 C0 CC 30 21 2C
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache ESME 1.0-incubating.
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if
> a majority of at least three +1 ESME PPMC votes is reached. Assuming
> the vote passes, I will ask the Incubator PMC to approve the release.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache ESME 1.0-incubating
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Here's my +1.
>
> Since the last release attempt, the following changes have been made
> * Updated README to indicate that ESME currently just supports JDK 1.6
> * Removed license reference from the README
> * Removed GPL-licensed and other unused dependencies from pom.xml. (Thanks Ethan)
> Perform "mvn site" to see the current dependencies. The only dependencies
> only license information are the com.twitter.* jars and I was unabled to find
> licensing info. Although newer versions in github are licensed with Apache
> License
> * Pom.xml no longer refers to lift snapshot but to the "1.1-M8" version
> * Changed version in pom.xml to <version>apache-esme-1.0-incubating</version>
> * removed svn files from release
> * directory created by release is no longer called "trunk"
> * Checked SHA signature on signed release but this should be a diff between SHA1
> and SHA512
>
>
> Dick Hirsch
Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of apache-esme-incubating-1.0 - (Yes Again :->)
Posted by Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>.
It displayed correctly on my machine...
On 17. feb. 2010, at 20.14, Richard Hirsch wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have posted our candidate for the first Apache release developed
>> within the ESME podling.
>>
>> The candidate can be found at
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~rhirsch/esme/
>>
>> See the CHANGES.txt file for details on release contents. The release
>> candidate is a tar archive of the sources in
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/esme/tags/apache-esme-1-0-0-incubating/
>
> The URL behind this element is incorrect if displayed in rich
> formatting: it should be
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/esme/tags/apache-esme-1-0-0-incubating/
> . Another reason to use text-only when writing emails.
>>
>> The MD5 checksum of the apache-esme-incubating-1.0-
>> src.tar.gz release package is
>>
>> 8E 43 0D DF F8 FE 15 9B 22 47 C2 C0 CC 30 21 2C
>>
>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache ESME 1.0-incubating.
>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if
>> a majority of at least three +1 ESME PPMC votes is reached. Assuming
>> the vote passes, I will ask the Incubator PMC to approve the release.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache ESME 1.0-incubating
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>
>> Here's my +1.
>>
>> Since the last release attempt, the following changes have been made
>> * Updated README to indicate that ESME currently just supports JDK 1.6
>> * Removed license reference from the README
>> * Removed GPL-licensed and other unused dependencies from pom.xml. (Thanks Ethan)
>> Perform "mvn site" to see the current dependencies. The only dependencies
>> only license information are the com.twitter.* jars and I was unabled to find
>> licensing info. Although newer versions in github are licensed with Apache
>> License
>> * Pom.xml no longer refers to lift snapshot but to the "1.1-M8" version
>> * Changed version in pom.xml to <version>apache-esme-1.0-incubating</version>
>> * removed svn files from release
>> * directory created by release is no longer called "trunk"
>> * Checked SHA signature on signed release but this should be a diff between SHA1
>> and SHA512
>>
>>
>> Dick Hirsch