You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@roller.apache.org by David M Johnson <Da...@Sun.COM> on 2006/01/03 00:05:52 UTC
Roll planned 2.2 features into 2.1?
I was hoping we'd be able to release Roller 2.1 during December. We
put it in production on a couple of sites (that will remain
nameless ;-), but there are still a couple of open issues that are
holding up the release. Here's the summary page for the 2.1 release:
http://rollerweblogger.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?
page=Proposal_Roller_2.1_Release
Now, Allen and I are getting started with "2.2" features and fixes
for a deployment end of January release. Here's the 2.2 summary page:
http://rollerweblogger.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?
page=Proposal_Roller_2.2_Release
Since 2.1 is not quite done, maybe we should take the stuff we had
planned for 2.2 and put it in 2.1. Here are my arguments: 1) People
are still coming to grips with 2.0 and don't necessarily need/want a
new release right now, 2) we'll save time by not going through the
release cycle right now and 3) most of the 2.2 changes are bug fixes
and performance improvements -- stuff that ought to be fixed.
What do you think?
- Dave
Re: Roll planned 2.2 features into 2.1?
Posted by David M Johnson <Da...@Sun.COM>.
I have merged the 2.2 features into the 2.1 proposal as Phase II.
http://www.rollerweblogger.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?
page=Proposal_Roller_2.1_Release
The proposed code freeze date is Thursday January 19th.
- Dave
On Jan 3, 2006, at 1:00 PM, Matt Raible wrote:
> +1
>
> On 1/3/06, Allen Gilliland <Al...@sun.com> wrote:
>> that's fine with me.
>>
>> -- Allen
>>
>>
>> David M Johnson wrote:
>>>
>>> I was hoping we'd be able to release Roller 2.1 during December.
>>> We put
>>> it in production on a couple of sites (that will remain
>>> nameless ;-),
>>> but there are still a couple of open issues that are holding up the
>>> release. Here's the summary page for the 2.1 release:
>>>
>>> http://rollerweblogger.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?
>>> page=Proposal_Roller_2.1_Release
>>>
>>> Now, Allen and I are getting started with "2.2" features and
>>> fixes for
>>> a deployment end of January release. Here's the 2.2 summary page:
>>>
>>> http://rollerweblogger.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?
>>> page=Proposal_Roller_2.2_Release
>>>
>>> Since 2.1 is not quite done, maybe we should take the stuff we had
>>> planned for 2.2 and put it in 2.1. Here are my arguments: 1)
>>> People are
>>> still coming to grips with 2.0 and don't necessarily need/want a
>>> new
>>> release right now, 2) we'll save time by not going through the
>>> release
>>> cycle right now and 3) most of the 2.2 changes are bug fixes and
>>> performance improvements -- stuff that ought to be fixed.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> - Dave
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: Roll planned 2.2 features into 2.1?
Posted by Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 1/3/06, Allen Gilliland <Al...@sun.com> wrote:
> that's fine with me.
>
> -- Allen
>
>
> David M Johnson wrote:
> >
> > I was hoping we'd be able to release Roller 2.1 during December. We put
> > it in production on a couple of sites (that will remain nameless ;-),
> > but there are still a couple of open issues that are holding up the
> > release. Here's the summary page for the 2.1 release:
> >
> > http://rollerweblogger.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?
> > page=Proposal_Roller_2.1_Release
> >
> > Now, Allen and I are getting started with "2.2" features and fixes for
> > a deployment end of January release. Here's the 2.2 summary page:
> >
> > http://rollerweblogger.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp? page=Proposal_Roller_2.2_Release
> >
> > Since 2.1 is not quite done, maybe we should take the stuff we had
> > planned for 2.2 and put it in 2.1. Here are my arguments: 1) People are
> > still coming to grips with 2.0 and don't necessarily need/want a new
> > release right now, 2) we'll save time by not going through the release
> > cycle right now and 3) most of the 2.2 changes are bug fixes and
> > performance improvements -- stuff that ought to be fixed.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > - Dave
> >
> >
>
Re: Roll planned 2.2 features into 2.1?
Posted by Allen Gilliland <Al...@Sun.COM>.
that's fine with me.
-- Allen
David M Johnson wrote:
>
> I was hoping we'd be able to release Roller 2.1 during December. We put
> it in production on a couple of sites (that will remain nameless ;-),
> but there are still a couple of open issues that are holding up the
> release. Here's the summary page for the 2.1 release:
>
> http://rollerweblogger.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?
> page=Proposal_Roller_2.1_Release
>
> Now, Allen and I are getting started with "2.2" features and fixes for
> a deployment end of January release. Here's the 2.2 summary page:
>
> http://rollerweblogger.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp? page=Proposal_Roller_2.2_Release
>
> Since 2.1 is not quite done, maybe we should take the stuff we had
> planned for 2.2 and put it in 2.1. Here are my arguments: 1) People are
> still coming to grips with 2.0 and don't necessarily need/want a new
> release right now, 2) we'll save time by not going through the release
> cycle right now and 3) most of the 2.2 changes are bug fixes and
> performance improvements -- stuff that ought to be fixed.
>
> What do you think?
>
> - Dave
>
>