You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Julian Reschke (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/08/23 11:57:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-8572) oak-upgrade's IndexAccessor lives in o.a.j.core

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16914205#comment-16914205 ] 

Julian Reschke commented on OAK-8572:
-------------------------------------

Proposed change:  [^OAK-8572.diff]  - using reflection. Unfortunately this currently doesn't seem to have test coverage, as the {{LongNameTest.testUpgradeToDocStore}} is currently ignored.

Another alternative would be to exclude the class from Javadoc generation, but I haven't figured out how (I can suppress packages, but not single classes).

[~tomek.rekawek]?

> oak-upgrade's IndexAccessor lives in o.a.j.core
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-8572
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8572
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: upgrade
>            Reporter: Julian Reschke
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: OAK-8572.diff
>
>
> This causes problems with Javadoc generation, as now the doc tool is confused about the core packae showing up both in jackrabbit classic and Oak.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)