You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by "ant elder (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2009/02/17 18:21:02 UTC

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-2845) Checked exceptions w/ default JMS wireFormat over should serialize fault, not FaultException

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

ant elder resolved TUSCANY-2845.
--------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next

Fixes for unchecked exception handling committed in r745140

> Checked exceptions w/ default JMS wireFormat over <binding.jms> should serialize fault, not FaultException
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TUSCANY-2845
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2845
>             Project: Tuscany
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Java SCA JMS Binding Extension
>            Reporter: Scott Kurz
>             Fix For: Java-SCA-Next
>
>
> I realize the spec doesn't spell this out, but I think the most natural mapping to say, what we do in <binding.ws>
> would be to serialize the fault to XML and put it in a TextMessage, assuming that the other side can construct the appropriate
> exception from the fault.
> True this is very JAX-WS-ish, which a straight JMS programmer might not expect... but what else could we do, use java.lang.Exception somehow?
> Today the checked exc seems to result in the throwing of FaultException, which will only work if Tuscany is on both sides.  

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.