You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by "Mike Kienenberger (JIRA)" <de...@myfaces.apache.org> on 2016/01/13 17:57:39 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (TOMAHAWK-1679) validateRegExpr Not Working in
Weblogic 10.3.6
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15096530#comment-15096530 ]
Mike Kienenberger commented on TOMAHAWK-1679:
---------------------------------------------
It would be better to ask questions on the MyFaces Discussion <us...@myfaces.apache.org> mailing list rather than in JIRA, especially since no one is actively working on Tomahawk development currently.
Closing this as it's a question rather than an issue.
> validateRegExpr Not Working in Weblogic 10.3.6
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TOMAHAWK-1679
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1679
> Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Validators
> Affects Versions: 1.1.9
> Environment: JDK 1.7, Weblogic 11g (10.3.6), tomahawk-1.1.9, myfaces-api-1.1.6, myfaces-impl-1.1.6, jstl-1.1.0
> Reporter: Julie Luo
>
> We have an existing application that uses the Tomahawk t:validateRegExpr validator to validate a numeric field.
> The following code is working successfully in the OC4J application server. After we migrated the application to weblogic 11g (10.3.6), the same code
> no longer works.
> <h:panelGroup>
> <h:inputText id="Batch_Size" value="#{managePropertiesBean.batchSize}" size="15" maxlength="3" required="true">
> <t:validateRegExpr pattern='^([1-9]|[1-9][0-9]|[1-9][0-9][0-9])\$' detailMessage='#{"{0} is not valid in this field." }'/>
> </h:inputText>
> <f:verbatim> </f:verbatim>
> <t:message id="batchSizeValueError" for="Batch_Size" styleClass="errorSpecific"/>
> </h:panelGroup>
> No matter what I type in this field, it fails the validation even when it's a number like 11. It's almost like validateRegExpr is not functioning at all.
> I have also tried using a newer version of Tomahawk (tomahawk20-1.1.15-20130903.221103-12), the problem still exists.
> Can someone provide some advice/suggestions about this?
> Thank you.
> Julie
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)