You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@iotdb.apache.org by Yuan Tian <ja...@gmail.com> on 2022/10/31 04:39:07 UTC
Chaneg the name of StandAloneConsensus
Hi, all
Now, we name the consensus which is optmized for only single
replica(actualy this consensus can only support one replica) as
StandAloneConsensus. However, `StandAlone` is ambiguous, it was used
for IoTDB StandAlone version(v.s. distributed version).
So, we decided to change its name, here are some candidates:
1. OneCopyConsensus
2. NoCopyConsensus
3. SimpleConsensus
4. ZereCostConsensus
Do you guys have any suggestions? Or Which one of the above names you voted for?
Best,
--------------
Yuan Tian
Re: Chaneg the name of StandAloneConsensus
Posted by William Song <sz...@163.com>.
Since there’s one replica and do not involve any consensus process, how about we remove the ‘Consensus’ suffix and call it ‘SingleReplica’?
Regards,
Song
> 2022年10月31日 12:39，Yuan Tian <ja...@gmail.com> 写道：
>
> Hi, all
>
> Now, we name the consensus which is optmized for only single
> replica(actualy this consensus can only support one replica) as
> StandAloneConsensus. However, `StandAlone` is ambiguous, it was used
> for IoTDB StandAlone version(v.s. distributed version).
>
> So, we decided to change its name, here are some candidates:
>
> 1. OneCopyConsensus
> 2. NoCopyConsensus
> 3. SimpleConsensus
> 4. ZereCostConsensus
>
> Do you guys have any suggestions? Or Which one of the above names you voted for?
>
>
> Best,
> --------------
> Yuan Tian
Re: Chaneg the name of StandAloneConsensus
Posted by Gaofei Cao <ti...@gmail.com>.
+1 for SimpleConsensus
OneCopy may be ambiguous. SimpleConsensus naming is friendly for new user.
Thanks,
Gaofei Cao
Jialin Qiao <qi...@apache.org> 于2022年11月2日周三 16:08写道：
>
> +1 for SimpleConsensus
>
> OneCopy may cause confuse, Users may treat one replica as OneCopy.
>
> Or treat OneCopy as two replicas ( one primary + one copy)
>
> Thanks,
> Jialin Qiao
>
>
> On 2022/11/02 04:14:52 Haonan Hou wrote:
> > +1 for SimpleConsensus.
> >
> > Cassandra has a similar `SimpleStrategy`.
> > See
> > https://cassandra.apache.org/doc/4.1/cassandra/architecture/dynamo.html#simple-strategy
> >
> > Best,
> > Haonan Hou
> >
> > > On Oct 31, 2022, at 9:32 PM, Jialin Qiao <qi...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 for OneReplicaConsensus
> > > —————————————————
> > > Jialin Qiao
> > > Apache IoTDB PMC
> > >
> > > Yuan Tian <ja...@gmail.com> 于2022年10月31日周一 20:08写道：
> > >>
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> After discussing, we think OneCopyConsensus may be better. So I rename
> > >> it to OneCopyConsensus in this pr
> > >> https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/7832/files
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> ----------------
> > >> Yuan Tian
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 12:39 PM Yuan Tian <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi, all
> > >>>
> > >>> Now, we name the consensus which is optmized for only single
> > >>> replica(actualy this consensus can only support one replica) as
> > >>> StandAloneConsensus. However, `StandAlone` is ambiguous, it was used
> > >>> for IoTDB StandAlone version(v.s. distributed version).
> > >>>
> > >>> So, we decided to change its name, here are some candidates:
> > >>>
> > >>> 1. OneCopyConsensus
> > >>> 2. NoCopyConsensus
> > >>> 3. SimpleConsensus
> > >>> 4. ZereCostConsensus
> > >>>
> > >>> Do you guys have any suggestions? Or Which one of the above names you voted for?
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Best,
> > >>> --------------
> > >>> Yuan Tian
> >
> >
Re: Chaneg the name of StandAloneConsensus
Posted by Jialin Qiao <qi...@apache.org>.
+1 for SimpleConsensus
OneCopy may cause confuse, Users may treat one replica as OneCopy.
Or treat OneCopy as two replicas ( one primary + one copy)
Thanks,
Jialin Qiao
On 2022/11/02 04:14:52 Haonan Hou wrote:
> +1 for SimpleConsensus.
>
> Cassandra has a similar `SimpleStrategy`.
> See
> https://cassandra.apache.org/doc/4.1/cassandra/architecture/dynamo.html#simple-strategy
>
> Best,
> Haonan Hou
>
> > On Oct 31, 2022, at 9:32 PM, Jialin Qiao <qi...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > +1 for OneReplicaConsensus
> > —————————————————
> > Jialin Qiao
> > Apache IoTDB PMC
> >
> > Yuan Tian <ja...@gmail.com> 于2022年10月31日周一 20:08写道：
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> After discussing, we think OneCopyConsensus may be better. So I rename
> >> it to OneCopyConsensus in this pr
> >> https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/7832/files
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> ----------------
> >> Yuan Tian
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 12:39 PM Yuan Tian <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi, all
> >>>
> >>> Now, we name the consensus which is optmized for only single
> >>> replica(actualy this consensus can only support one replica) as
> >>> StandAloneConsensus. However, `StandAlone` is ambiguous, it was used
> >>> for IoTDB StandAlone version(v.s. distributed version).
> >>>
> >>> So, we decided to change its name, here are some candidates:
> >>>
> >>> 1. OneCopyConsensus
> >>> 2. NoCopyConsensus
> >>> 3. SimpleConsensus
> >>> 4. ZereCostConsensus
> >>>
> >>> Do you guys have any suggestions? Or Which one of the above names you voted for?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> --------------
> >>> Yuan Tian
>
>
Re: Chaneg the name of StandAloneConsensus
Posted by Haonan Hou <hh...@qq.com.INVALID>.
+1 for SimpleConsensus.
Cassandra has a similar `SimpleStrategy`.
See
https://cassandra.apache.org/doc/4.1/cassandra/architecture/dynamo.html#simple-strategy
Best,
Haonan Hou
> On Oct 31, 2022, at 9:32 PM, Jialin Qiao <qi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1 for OneReplicaConsensus
> —————————————————
> Jialin Qiao
> Apache IoTDB PMC
>
> Yuan Tian <ja...@gmail.com> 于2022年10月31日周一 20:08写道：
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After discussing, we think OneCopyConsensus may be better. So I rename
>> it to OneCopyConsensus in this pr
>> https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/7832/files
>>
>> Best,
>> ----------------
>> Yuan Tian
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 12:39 PM Yuan Tian <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, all
>>>
>>> Now, we name the consensus which is optmized for only single
>>> replica(actualy this consensus can only support one replica) as
>>> StandAloneConsensus. However, `StandAlone` is ambiguous, it was used
>>> for IoTDB StandAlone version(v.s. distributed version).
>>>
>>> So, we decided to change its name, here are some candidates:
>>>
>>> 1. OneCopyConsensus
>>> 2. NoCopyConsensus
>>> 3. SimpleConsensus
>>> 4. ZereCostConsensus
>>>
>>> Do you guys have any suggestions? Or Which one of the above names you voted for?
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> --------------
>>> Yuan Tian
Re: Chaneg the name of StandAloneConsensus
Posted by Haonan Hou <hh...@qq.com.INVALID>.
+1 for SimpleConsensus.
Cassandra has a similar `SimpleStrategy`.
See
https://cassandra.apache.org/doc/4.1/cassandra/architecture/dynamo.html#simple-strategy
Best,
Haonan Hou
> On Oct 31, 2022, at 9:32 PM, Jialin Qiao <qi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1 for OneReplicaConsensus
> —————————————————
> Jialin Qiao
> Apache IoTDB PMC
>
> Yuan Tian <ja...@gmail.com> 于2022年10月31日周一 20:08写道：
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After discussing, we think OneCopyConsensus may be better. So I rename
>> it to OneCopyConsensus in this pr
>> https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/7832/files
>>
>> Best,
>> ----------------
>> Yuan Tian
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 12:39 PM Yuan Tian <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, all
>>>
>>> Now, we name the consensus which is optmized for only single
>>> replica(actualy this consensus can only support one replica) as
>>> StandAloneConsensus. However, `StandAlone` is ambiguous, it was used
>>> for IoTDB StandAlone version(v.s. distributed version).
>>>
>>> So, we decided to change its name, here are some candidates:
>>>
>>> 1. OneCopyConsensus
>>> 2. NoCopyConsensus
>>> 3. SimpleConsensus
>>> 4. ZereCostConsensus
>>>
>>> Do you guys have any suggestions? Or Which one of the above names you voted for?
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> --------------
>>> Yuan Tian
Re: Chaneg the name of StandAloneConsensus
Posted by Jialin Qiao <qi...@apache.org>.
+1 for OneReplicaConsensus
—————————————————
Jialin Qiao
Apache IoTDB PMC
Yuan Tian <ja...@gmail.com> 于2022年10月31日周一 20:08写道：
>
> Hi all,
>
> After discussing, we think OneCopyConsensus may be better. So I rename
> it to OneCopyConsensus in this pr
> https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/7832/files
>
> Best,
> ----------------
> Yuan Tian
>
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 12:39 PM Yuan Tian <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, all
> >
> > Now, we name the consensus which is optmized for only single
> > replica(actualy this consensus can only support one replica) as
> > StandAloneConsensus. However, `StandAlone` is ambiguous, it was used
> > for IoTDB StandAlone version(v.s. distributed version).
> >
> > So, we decided to change its name, here are some candidates:
> >
> > 1. OneCopyConsensus
> > 2. NoCopyConsensus
> > 3. SimpleConsensus
> > 4. ZereCostConsensus
> >
> > Do you guys have any suggestions? Or Which one of the above names you voted for?
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > --------------
> > Yuan Tian
Re: Chaneg the name of StandAloneConsensus
Posted by Yuan Tian <ja...@gmail.com>.
Hi all,
After discussing, we think OneCopyConsensus may be better. So I rename
it to OneCopyConsensus in this pr
https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/7832/files
Best,
----------------
Yuan Tian
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 12:39 PM Yuan Tian <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, all
>
> Now, we name the consensus which is optmized for only single
> replica(actualy this consensus can only support one replica) as
> StandAloneConsensus. However, `StandAlone` is ambiguous, it was used
> for IoTDB StandAlone version(v.s. distributed version).
>
> So, we decided to change its name, here are some candidates:
>
> 1. OneCopyConsensus
> 2. NoCopyConsensus
> 3. SimpleConsensus
> 4. ZereCostConsensus
>
> Do you guys have any suggestions? Or Which one of the above names you voted for?
>
>
> Best,
> --------------
> Yuan Tian
Re: Chaneg the name of StandAloneConsensus
Posted by Guanfei Guo <gu...@qq.com.INVALID>.
How about PairConsensus?
Thanks.
Guanfei Guo
From: Yuan Tian
Date: 2022-10-31 12:39
To: dev
Subject: Chaneg the name of StandAloneConsensus
Hi, all
Now, we name the consensus which is optmized for only single
replica(actualy this consensus can only support one replica) as
StandAloneConsensus. However, `StandAlone` is ambiguous, it was used
for IoTDB StandAlone version(v.s. distributed version).
So, we decided to change its name, here are some candidates:
1. OneCopyConsensus
2. NoCopyConsensus
3. SimpleConsensus
4. ZereCostConsensus
Do you guys have any suggestions? Or Which one of the above names you voted for?
Best,
--------------
Yuan Tian