You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@streams.apache.org by sblackmon <sb...@apache.org> on 2016/12/03 19:51:13 UTC
[DISCUSS] interest in maintaining streams-runtime-pig?
In attempting to resolve STREAMS-155, I’m finding that switching from pig version 0.11.0-cdh4.6.0 to apache pig 0.11.2 breaks the tests. The fix does not appear to be trivial.
I’ll just ask outright if anyone has any interest in maintaining the pig binding? If not I’m inclined to remove it from the reactor or delete it outright.
Steve
Re: [DISCUSS] interest in maintaining streams-runtime-pig?
Posted by Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>.
+1
Trevor Grant
Data Scientist
https://github.com/rawkintrevo
http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
http://trevorgrant.org
*"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things." -Virgil*
On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 4:16 PM, sblackmon <sb...@apache.org> wrote:
> Let’s keep to our plan to close STREAMS-155 in the 0.5-incubating
> release. It’s come up in now twice during IPMC reviews.
>
> If someone wants to put up a pull request covering streams-runtime-pig
> that switches from cdh to apache official dependencies and keeps all the
> test passing in the several weeks before the release, great.
>
> Otherwise, I think we should remove it from the reactor or delete it
> before the release rather that retain an inflexible dependency on cdh4.
>
> Steve
> On December 3, 2016 at 2:08:35 PM, Suneel Marthi (suneel.marthi@gmail.com)
> wrote:
>
> Ok with me, unless there r active users of pig that may have objections.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Dec 3, 2016, at 2:51 PM, sblackmon <sb...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > In attempting to resolve STREAMS-155, I’m finding that switching from
> pig version 0.11.0-cdh4.6.0 to apache pig 0.11.2 breaks the tests. The fix
> does not appear to be trivial.
> >
> > I’ll just ask outright if anyone has any interest in maintaining the pig
> binding? If not I’m inclined to remove it from the reactor or delete it
> outright.
> >
> > Steve
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] interest in maintaining streams-runtime-pig?
Posted by sblackmon <sb...@apache.org>.
Let’s keep to our plan to close STREAMS-155 in the 0.5-incubating release. It’s come up in now twice during IPMC reviews.
If someone wants to put up a pull request covering streams-runtime-pig that switches from cdh to apache official dependencies and keeps all the test passing in the several weeks before the release, great.
Otherwise, I think we should remove it from the reactor or delete it before the release rather that retain an inflexible dependency on cdh4.
Steve
On December 3, 2016 at 2:08:35 PM, Suneel Marthi (suneel.marthi@gmail.com) wrote:
Ok with me, unless there r active users of pig that may have objections.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 3, 2016, at 2:51 PM, sblackmon <sb...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> In attempting to resolve STREAMS-155, I’m finding that switching from pig version 0.11.0-cdh4.6.0 to apache pig 0.11.2 breaks the tests. The fix does not appear to be trivial.
>
> I’ll just ask outright if anyone has any interest in maintaining the pig binding? If not I’m inclined to remove it from the reactor or delete it outright.
>
> Steve
>
Re: [DISCUSS] interest in maintaining streams-runtime-pig?
Posted by Suneel Marthi <su...@gmail.com>.
Ok with me, unless there r active users of pig that may have objections.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 3, 2016, at 2:51 PM, sblackmon <sb...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> In attempting to resolve STREAMS-155, I’m finding that switching from pig version 0.11.0-cdh4.6.0 to apache pig 0.11.2 breaks the tests. The fix does not appear to be trivial.
>
> I’ll just ask outright if anyone has any interest in maintaining the pig binding? If not I’m inclined to remove it from the reactor or delete it outright.
>
> Steve
>