You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> on 2007/03/28 01:23:51 UTC
[VOTE] release wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha (new version)
I've tried to remove some issues from our previous round. The less
issues to cope with, the better.
- just one target directory still eludes me, the rest have been eliminated
- jetty jars are now provided, and not put in the examples war
- build artifacts now go into target/dist and target/m2-repo (making
the build process self contained and more platform independent)
So another round, another vote.
[ ] Yes release the damned thing already
[ ] Yes, this is the last time I vote on this... My + and 1 keys show
signs of wear
[ ] No, I found this issue and you'd better fix it, or ...
I'm working on the release file for the @incubator list. I'll post it
to @dev sometime tomorrow (for a given value of tomorrow).
I hope for a quick vote this time.
Martijn
--
Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org
Re: [VOTE] release wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha (new version)
Posted by Janne Hietamäki <ja...@apache.org>.
On 28.3.2007, at 2.23, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>
> [ x] Yes release the damned thing already
> [ ] Yes, this is the last time I vote on this... My + and 1 keys show
> signs of wear
> [ ] No, I found this issue and you'd better fix it, or ...
Re: [VOTE] release wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha (new version)
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Quenot <jb...@apache.org>.
* Al Maw:
> I can't verify the ASC sigs, 'cos I don't have your public PGP key.
Have you tried this:
$ gpg --search-keys dashorst@apache.org
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/jbq/
Re: [VOTE] release wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha (new version)
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
Al thx for your investigation... you're welcome to fix anything in the
release branch. :)
Martijn
On 3/28/07, Al Maw <wi...@almaw.com> wrote:
> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> > I've tried to remove some issues from our previous round. The less
> > issues to cope with, the better.
> > - just one target directory still eludes me, the rest have been eliminated
> > - jetty jars are now provided, and not put in the examples war
> > - build artifacts now go into target/dist and target/m2-repo (making
> > the build process self contained and more platform independent)
> >
> > So another round, another vote.
> >
> > [ ] Yes release the damned thing already
> > [ ] Yes, this is the last time I vote on this... My + and 1 keys show
> > signs of wear
> > [ ] No, I found this issue and you'd better fix it, or ...
>
> Yeah, +1 to release it to the incubator folk.
>
> I can't verify the ASC sigs, 'cos I don't have your public PGP key.
>
> Other than that, things I've checked are:
> - Tests all pass.
> - mvn install works with nothing in local repo already.
> - SHA1 and MD5 sums are OK.
> - Tarball and ZIP have exactly the same contents.
> - The links in the README, etc. text files work/exist.
>
> I might write a script to automate as much of the above as possible.
>
> Things I haven't checked:
> - That the JAR files in /lib all work.
> - That the wicket-examples WAR works.
>
> Obvious those are quite important. :-)
> If someone else can verify those, then I'm +1 on the rest of it.
>
>
> Some minor quibbles, none of which stand in the way:
>
> - There's a src/dist folder that's empty.
>
> - I'm not sure we need the release.sh script in the actual zip/tgz.
>
> - It'd be nice to make the eclipse.sh script executable (for the
> tar.gz, at least). You can do that with a <fileMode>0755</fileMode>
> element in a <fileSet> element in the assembly descriptor, but it's
> hardly a big deal.
>
> - I think we should move the EclipseCodeFormat.xml from wicket to
> the top-level parent folder.
>
> - While checking all this, I noticed that the JIRA link on
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/wicket.html doesn't work (it
> needs an http:// on the front).
>
>
> Thanks Martijn!
>
> Al
>
--
Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org
Re: Failing unit tests (WAS: Re: [VOTE] release wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha (new version))
Posted by Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com>.
can;'t we do a XML based equals?
Most of the time it is xml what we output. So why not do a xml bases compare
johan
On 3/28/07, Janne Hietamäki <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 28, 2007, at 11:23 AM, Al Maw wrote:
>
> >
> > Other than that, things I've checked are:
> > - Tests all pass.
>
> Hmm. I tried to run the tests, and some of them are failing because
> the outputted markup has attributes in wrong order. Tests pass ok
> when I use JDK 1.5.0, but with 1.4.2 or 1.6.0 (on OS X) some of them
> fail.
>
> This is really a old feature, but may be we should finally find a
> decent fix for it. ValueMap/AttributeMap is based on HashMap which
> causes the attributes are not in predicted order. SortedMap is one
> option, but could we find a more efficient one? Attribute order
> really matters only when testing, so modifying the diffutil could be
> another option..
>
> What do you think?
>
> Here's one example:
>
> testDetachPageAjaxRequest(wicket.ComponentTest) Time elapsed: 0.008
> sec <<< FAILURE!
> junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: wicket/
> TestDetachPageExpectedResult.html expected:<...wicket:id="comp"
> onclick="var wcall=wicketAjaxGet('?wicket:interface=:
> 0:comp::IBehaviorListener:0', function() { }, function() { });"
> id="comp0...> but was:<...id="comp0" onc
> lick="var wcall=wicketAjaxGet('?wicket:interface=:
> 0:comp::IBehaviorListener:0', function() { }, function() { });"
> wicket:id="comp...>
> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:81)
> at wicket.util.diff.DiffUtil.validatePage(DiffUtil.java:106)
>
>
> Janne
>
Re: Failing unit tests (WAS: Re: [VOTE] release wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha (new version))
Posted by Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com>.
Depends on what is easier to fix. I'm certainly not for changing to a
less efficient implementation just for the sake of the unit tests, so
if the DiffUtil could be changed, that would be great. IMO, our unit
tests are too brittle anyway, so a diffutil that would be a little bit
smarter would be very nice.
Eelco
On 3/28/07, Janne Hietamäki <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Mar 28, 2007, at 11:23 AM, Al Maw wrote:
>
> >
> > Other than that, things I've checked are:
> > - Tests all pass.
>
> Hmm. I tried to run the tests, and some of them are failing because
> the outputted markup has attributes in wrong order. Tests pass ok
> when I use JDK 1.5.0, but with 1.4.2 or 1.6.0 (on OS X) some of them
> fail.
>
> This is really a old feature, but may be we should finally find a
> decent fix for it. ValueMap/AttributeMap is based on HashMap which
> causes the attributes are not in predicted order. SortedMap is one
> option, but could we find a more efficient one? Attribute order
> really matters only when testing, so modifying the diffutil could be
> another option..
>
> What do you think?
>
> Here's one example:
>
> testDetachPageAjaxRequest(wicket.ComponentTest) Time elapsed: 0.008
> sec <<< FAILURE!
> junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: wicket/
> TestDetachPageExpectedResult.html expected:<...wicket:id="comp"
> onclick="var wcall=wicketAjaxGet('?wicket:interface=:
> 0:comp::IBehaviorListener:0', function() { }, function() { });"
> id="comp0...> but was:<...id="comp0" onc
> lick="var wcall=wicketAjaxGet('?wicket:interface=:
> 0:comp::IBehaviorListener:0', function() { }, function() { });"
> wicket:id="comp...>
> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:81)
> at wicket.util.diff.DiffUtil.validatePage(DiffUtil.java:106)
>
>
> Janne
>
Re: Failing unit tests (WAS: Re: [VOTE] release wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha (new version))
Posted by Janne Hietamäki <ja...@punainen.org>.
Yeah, that's why I changed the subject..
On Mar 28, 2007, at 12:58 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> This is a known issue and does not hold back the release.
>
> Martijn
>
> On 3/28/07, Janne Hietamäki <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 28, 2007, at 11:23 AM, Al Maw wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Other than that, things I've checked are:
>> > - Tests all pass.
>>
>> Hmm. I tried to run the tests, and some of them are failing because
>> the outputted markup has attributes in wrong order. Tests pass ok
>> when I use JDK 1.5.0, but with 1.4.2 or 1.6.0 (on OS X) some of them
>> fail.
>>
>> This is really a old feature, but may be we should finally find a
>> decent fix for it. ValueMap/AttributeMap is based on HashMap which
>> causes the attributes are not in predicted order. SortedMap is one
>> option, but could we find a more efficient one? Attribute order
>> really matters only when testing, so modifying the diffutil could be
>> another option..
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Here's one example:
>>
>> testDetachPageAjaxRequest(wicket.ComponentTest) Time elapsed: 0.008
>> sec <<< FAILURE!
>> junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: wicket/
>> TestDetachPageExpectedResult.html expected:<...wicket:id="comp"
>> onclick="var wcall=wicketAjaxGet('?wicket:interface=:
>> 0:comp::IBehaviorListener:0', function() { }, function() { });"
>> id="comp0...> but was:<...id="comp0" onc
>> lick="var wcall=wicketAjaxGet('?wicket:interface=:
>> 0:comp::IBehaviorListener:0', function() { }, function() { });"
>> wicket:id="comp...>
>> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:81)
>> at wicket.util.diff.DiffUtil.validatePage(DiffUtil.java:106)
>>
>>
>> Janne
>>
>
>
> --
> Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
> Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
> Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now!
> http://wicketframework.org
Re: Failing unit tests (WAS: Re: [VOTE] release wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha (new version))
Posted by Janne Hietamäki <ja...@apache.org>.
Yup, that's why I changed the subject.
Janne
On Mar 28, 2007, at 12:58 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> This is a known issue and does not hold back the release.
>
> Martijn
>
> On 3/28/07, Janne Hietamäki <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 28, 2007, at 11:23 AM, Al Maw wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Other than that, things I've checked are:
>> > - Tests all pass.
>>
>> Hmm. I tried to run the tests, and some of them are failing because
>> the outputted markup has attributes in wrong order. Tests pass ok
>> when I use JDK 1.5.0, but with 1.4.2 or 1.6.0 (on OS X) some of them
>> fail.
>>
>> This is really a old feature, but may be we should finally find a
>> decent fix for it. ValueMap/AttributeMap is based on HashMap which
>> causes the attributes are not in predicted order. SortedMap is one
>> option, but could we find a more efficient one? Attribute order
>> really matters only when testing, so modifying the diffutil could be
>> another option..
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Here's one example:
>>
>> testDetachPageAjaxRequest(wicket.ComponentTest) Time elapsed: 0.008
>> sec <<< FAILURE!
>> junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: wicket/
>> TestDetachPageExpectedResult.html expected:<...wicket:id="comp"
>> onclick="var wcall=wicketAjaxGet('?wicket:interface=:
>> 0:comp::IBehaviorListener:0', function() { }, function() { });"
>> id="comp0...> but was:<...id="comp0" onc
>> lick="var wcall=wicketAjaxGet('?wicket:interface=:
>> 0:comp::IBehaviorListener:0', function() { }, function() { });"
>> wicket:id="comp...>
>> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:81)
>> at wicket.util.diff.DiffUtil.validatePage(DiffUtil.java:106)
>>
>>
>> Janne
>>
>
>
> --
> Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
> Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
> Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now!
> http://wicketframework.org
Re: Failing unit tests (WAS: Re: [VOTE] release wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha (new version))
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
This is a known issue and does not hold back the release.
Martijn
On 3/28/07, Janne Hietamäki <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Mar 28, 2007, at 11:23 AM, Al Maw wrote:
>
> >
> > Other than that, things I've checked are:
> > - Tests all pass.
>
> Hmm. I tried to run the tests, and some of them are failing because
> the outputted markup has attributes in wrong order. Tests pass ok
> when I use JDK 1.5.0, but with 1.4.2 or 1.6.0 (on OS X) some of them
> fail.
>
> This is really a old feature, but may be we should finally find a
> decent fix for it. ValueMap/AttributeMap is based on HashMap which
> causes the attributes are not in predicted order. SortedMap is one
> option, but could we find a more efficient one? Attribute order
> really matters only when testing, so modifying the diffutil could be
> another option..
>
> What do you think?
>
> Here's one example:
>
> testDetachPageAjaxRequest(wicket.ComponentTest) Time elapsed: 0.008
> sec <<< FAILURE!
> junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: wicket/
> TestDetachPageExpectedResult.html expected:<...wicket:id="comp"
> onclick="var wcall=wicketAjaxGet('?wicket:interface=:
> 0:comp::IBehaviorListener:0', function() { }, function() { });"
> id="comp0...> but was:<...id="comp0" onc
> lick="var wcall=wicketAjaxGet('?wicket:interface=:
> 0:comp::IBehaviorListener:0', function() { }, function() { });"
> wicket:id="comp...>
> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:81)
> at wicket.util.diff.DiffUtil.validatePage(DiffUtil.java:106)
>
>
> Janne
>
--
Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org
Failing unit tests (WAS: Re: [VOTE] release wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha (new version))
Posted by Janne Hietamäki <ja...@apache.org>.
On Mar 28, 2007, at 11:23 AM, Al Maw wrote:
>
> Other than that, things I've checked are:
> - Tests all pass.
Hmm. I tried to run the tests, and some of them are failing because
the outputted markup has attributes in wrong order. Tests pass ok
when I use JDK 1.5.0, but with 1.4.2 or 1.6.0 (on OS X) some of them
fail.
This is really a old feature, but may be we should finally find a
decent fix for it. ValueMap/AttributeMap is based on HashMap which
causes the attributes are not in predicted order. SortedMap is one
option, but could we find a more efficient one? Attribute order
really matters only when testing, so modifying the diffutil could be
another option..
What do you think?
Here's one example:
testDetachPageAjaxRequest(wicket.ComponentTest) Time elapsed: 0.008
sec <<< FAILURE!
junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: wicket/
TestDetachPageExpectedResult.html expected:<...wicket:id="comp"
onclick="var wcall=wicketAjaxGet('?wicket:interface=:
0:comp::IBehaviorListener:0', function() { }, function() { });"
id="comp0...> but was:<...id="comp0" onc
lick="var wcall=wicketAjaxGet('?wicket:interface=:
0:comp::IBehaviorListener:0', function() { }, function() { });"
wicket:id="comp...>
at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:81)
at wicket.util.diff.DiffUtil.validatePage(DiffUtil.java:106)
Janne
Re: [VOTE] release wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha (new version)
Posted by Gwyn Evans <gw...@gmail.com>.
On 28/03/07, Al Maw <wi...@almaw.com> wrote:
> I can't verify the ASC sigs, 'cos I don't have your public PGP key.
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wicket/common/KEYS
/Gwyn
--
Download Wicket 1.2.5 now! - http://wicketframework.org
Re: [VOTE] release wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha (new version)
Posted by Al Maw <wi...@almaw.com>.
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> I've tried to remove some issues from our previous round. The less
> issues to cope with, the better.
> - just one target directory still eludes me, the rest have been eliminated
> - jetty jars are now provided, and not put in the examples war
> - build artifacts now go into target/dist and target/m2-repo (making
> the build process self contained and more platform independent)
>
> So another round, another vote.
>
> [ ] Yes release the damned thing already
> [ ] Yes, this is the last time I vote on this... My + and 1 keys show
> signs of wear
> [ ] No, I found this issue and you'd better fix it, or ...
Yeah, +1 to release it to the incubator folk.
I can't verify the ASC sigs, 'cos I don't have your public PGP key.
Other than that, things I've checked are:
- Tests all pass.
- mvn install works with nothing in local repo already.
- SHA1 and MD5 sums are OK.
- Tarball and ZIP have exactly the same contents.
- The links in the README, etc. text files work/exist.
I might write a script to automate as much of the above as possible.
Things I haven't checked:
- That the JAR files in /lib all work.
- That the wicket-examples WAR works.
Obvious those are quite important. :-)
If someone else can verify those, then I'm +1 on the rest of it.
Some minor quibbles, none of which stand in the way:
- There's a src/dist folder that's empty.
- I'm not sure we need the release.sh script in the actual zip/tgz.
- It'd be nice to make the eclipse.sh script executable (for the
tar.gz, at least). You can do that with a <fileMode>0755</fileMode>
element in a <fileSet> element in the assembly descriptor, but it's
hardly a big deal.
- I think we should move the EclipseCodeFormat.xml from wicket to
the top-level parent folder.
- While checking all this, I noticed that the JIRA link on
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/wicket.html doesn't work (it
needs an http:// on the front).
Thanks Martijn!
Al
Re: [VOTE] release wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha (new version)
Posted by Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com>.
[x] Yes, this is the last time I vote on this... My x key shows signs of
wear
On 3/28/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I've tried to remove some issues from our previous round. The less
> issues to cope with, the better.
> - just one target directory still eludes me, the rest have been eliminated
> - jetty jars are now provided, and not put in the examples war
> - build artifacts now go into target/dist and target/m2-repo (making
> the build process self contained and more platform independent)
>
> So another round, another vote.
>
> [ ] Yes release the damned thing already
> [ ] Yes, this is the last time I vote on this... My + and 1 keys show
> signs of wear
> [ ] No, I found this issue and you'd better fix it, or ...
>
> I'm working on the release file for the @incubator list. I'll post it
> to @dev sometime tomorrow (for a given value of tomorrow).
>
> I hope for a quick vote this time.
>
> Martijn
>
> --
> Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
> Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
> Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now!
> http://wicketframework.org
>
Re: [VOTE] release wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha (new version)
Posted by Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>.
with all the votes lately those keys dont work anymore thus i couldnt use
them, its a good thing martijn provides these alternate choices
-igor
On 3/27/07, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> how is that possible? You didn't use + and then 1 key at all for this
> reply
> so don't lie!
>
> On 3/28/07, Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > [x] Yes, this is the last time I vote on this... My + and 1 keys show
> > signs
> > of wear
> > -igor
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] release wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha (new version)
Posted by Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com>.
how is that possible? You didn't use + and then 1 key at all for this reply
so don't lie!
On 3/28/07, Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> [x] Yes, this is the last time I vote on this... My + and 1 keys show
> signs
> of wear
> -igor
>
Re: [VOTE] release wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha (new version)
Posted by Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>.
[x] Yes, this is the last time I vote on this... My + and 1 keys show signs
of wear
-igor
Re: [VOTE] release wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha (new version)
Posted by Gwyn Evans <gw...@gmail.com>.
Likewise... :-)
[x] Yes release the damned thing already
/Gwyn
On 29/03/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I forgot +1 myself
>
> On 3/28/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > And you can find the stuff here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~dashorst/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > On 3/28/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I've tried to remove some issues from our previous round. The less
> > > issues to cope with, the better.
> > > - just one target directory still eludes me, the rest have been eliminated
> > > - jetty jars are now provided, and not put in the examples war
> > > - build artifacts now go into target/dist and target/m2-repo (making
> > > the build process self contained and more platform independent)
> > >
> > > So another round, another vote.
> > >
> > > [ ] Yes release the damned thing already
> > > [ ] Yes, this is the last time I vote on this... My + and 1 keys show
> > > signs of wear
> > > [ ] No, I found this issue and you'd better fix it, or ...
> > >
> > > I'm working on the release file for the @incubator list. I'll post it
> > > to @dev sometime tomorrow (for a given value of tomorrow).
> > >
> > > I hope for a quick vote this time.
> > >
> > > Martijn
> > >
> > > --
> > > Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
> > > Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
> > > Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now!
> > > http://wicketframework.org
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
> > Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
> > Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now!
> > http://wicketframework.org
> >
>
>
> --
> Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
> Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
> Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now!
> http://wicketframework.org
>
--
Download Wicket 1.2.5 now! - http://wicketframework.org
Re: [VOTE] release wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha (new version)
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
I have 7 +1 votes, and no -1's, and no burning issues to resolve, so
that makes this a go.
Sorry for abusing the + and 1 keys... be gentle with them, give them a
special scrubbing tonight or something.
I'll write up a proposal for the IPMC and send it here. If noone
objects within 24 hours, I'll send it to @incubator.
Martijn
--
Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org
Re: [VOTE] release wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha (new version)
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
I forgot +1 myself
On 3/28/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> And you can find the stuff here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~dashorst/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha
>
> Martijn
>
> On 3/28/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I've tried to remove some issues from our previous round. The less
> > issues to cope with, the better.
> > - just one target directory still eludes me, the rest have been eliminated
> > - jetty jars are now provided, and not put in the examples war
> > - build artifacts now go into target/dist and target/m2-repo (making
> > the build process self contained and more platform independent)
> >
> > So another round, another vote.
> >
> > [ ] Yes release the damned thing already
> > [ ] Yes, this is the last time I vote on this... My + and 1 keys show
> > signs of wear
> > [ ] No, I found this issue and you'd better fix it, or ...
> >
> > I'm working on the release file for the @incubator list. I'll post it
> > to @dev sometime tomorrow (for a given value of tomorrow).
> >
> > I hope for a quick vote this time.
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > --
> > Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
> > Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
> > Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now!
> > http://wicketframework.org
> >
>
>
> --
> Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
> Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
> Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now!
> http://wicketframework.org
>
--
Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org
Re: [VOTE] release wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha (new version)
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
And you can find the stuff here:
http://people.apache.org/~dashorst/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha
Martijn
On 3/28/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've tried to remove some issues from our previous round. The less
> issues to cope with, the better.
> - just one target directory still eludes me, the rest have been eliminated
> - jetty jars are now provided, and not put in the examples war
> - build artifacts now go into target/dist and target/m2-repo (making
> the build process self contained and more platform independent)
>
> So another round, another vote.
>
> [ ] Yes release the damned thing already
> [ ] Yes, this is the last time I vote on this... My + and 1 keys show
> signs of wear
> [ ] No, I found this issue and you'd better fix it, or ...
>
> I'm working on the release file for the @incubator list. I'll post it
> to @dev sometime tomorrow (for a given value of tomorrow).
>
> I hope for a quick vote this time.
>
> Martijn
>
> --
> Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
> Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
> Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now!
> http://wicketframework.org
>
--
Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org
Re: [VOTE] release wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha (new version)
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Quenot <jb...@apache.org>.
> [x] Yes release the damned thing already
> [ ] Yes, this is the last time I vote on this... My + and 1 keys show
> signs of wear
> [ ] No, I found this issue and you'd better fix it, or ...
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/jbq/
Re: [VOTE] release wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha (new version)
Posted by Frank Bille <fr...@gmail.com>.
On 3/28/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> [x] Yes release the damned thing already
Frank
P.s. I really think it's a cool distribution now. It's really well
structured and self-contained. If only every software distribution (also the
apache ones) were like this :)
Re: [VOTE] release wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha (new version)
Posted by Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com>.
[ ] Yes release the damned thing already
[ x ] Yes, this is the last time I vote on this... My + and 1 keys
show signs of wear
[ ] No, I found this issue and you'd better fix it, or ...
Eelco