You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hive.apache.org by "Krisztian Kasa (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/12/05 19:20:00 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (HIVE-26762) Remove operand pruning in HiveFilterSetOpTransposeRule

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-26762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Krisztian Kasa resolved HIVE-26762.
-----------------------------------
    Resolution: Fixed

Merged to master. Thanks [~asolimando] for the patch.

> Remove operand pruning in HiveFilterSetOpTransposeRule
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-26762
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-26762
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: CBO, Query Planning
>    Affects Versions: 4.0.0-alpha-2
>            Reporter: Alessandro Solimando
>            Assignee: Alessandro Solimando
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>          Time Spent: 1h 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> HiveFilterSetOpTransposeRule, when applied to UNION ALL operands, checks if the newly pushed filter simplifies to FALSE (due to the predicates holding on the input).
> If this is true and there is more than one UNION ALL operand, it gets pruned.
> After HIVE-26524 ("Use Calcite to remove sections of a query plan known never produces rows"), this is possibly redundant and we could drop this feature and let the other rules take care of the pruning.
> In such a case, it might be even possible to drop the Hive specific rule and relies on the Calcite one (the difference is just the operand pruning at the moment of writing), similarly to what HIVE-26642 did for HiveReduceExpressionRule. Writing it here as a reminder, but it's recommended to tackle this in a separate ticket after verifying that is feasible.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)