You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to mod_python-dev@quetz.apache.org by Jim Gallacher <jg...@apache.org> on 2006/06/30 04:52:10 UTC
mod_python 3.2.9 available for testing
The mod_python 3.2.9 tarball is available for testing.
This tarball is unchanged from 3.2.9-rc3, but should be retested anyway
- just in case something went pair-shaped in the process of tagging and
packaging.
Here are the rules:
In order for a file to be officially announced, it has to be tested by
developers on the dev list. Anyone subscribed to this list can (and
should feel obligated to :-) ) test it, and provide feedback *to _this_
list*! (Not the mod_python@modpython.org list, and preferably not me
personally).
The files are (temporarily) available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/
http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.2.9.tgz
http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.2.9.tgz.md5
Please download it, then do the usual
$ ./configure --with-apxs=/wherever/it/is
$ make
$ (su)
# make install
Then (as non-root user!)
$ cd test
$ python test.py
And see if any tests fail. If they pass, send a +1 to the list, if they
fail, send the details (the versions of OS, Apache, Apache-mpm, Python,
the test output, and suggestions, if any).
Please present your test results in the following format:
+1 OS version, Apache version (apache mpm), Python Version
For example:
+1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
Presenting your information in a consistent format will help in
tabulating the results. You can include additional information in each
section, just don't use extra commas. There is no need to include the
mod_python version in this string as that information is available in
the email subject. Who knows, one day I may actually write a script to
extract this information automatically. :)
Thank you for your assistance,
Jim Gallacher
Re: mod_python 3.2.9 available for testing
Posted by Colin Bean <cc...@gmail.com>.
+1 Fedora Core 5 (i386), Apache 2.2.0 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3
Re: mod_python 3.2.9 available for testing
Posted by Jorey Bump <li...@joreybump.com>.
+1 Linux Slackware 10.2, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.1
Jim Gallacher wrote:
> The mod_python 3.2.9 tarball is available for testing.
>
> This tarball is unchanged from 3.2.9-rc3, but should be retested anyway
> - just in case something went pair-shaped in the process of tagging and
> packaging.
>
> Here are the rules:
>
> In order for a file to be officially announced, it has to be tested by
> developers on the dev list. Anyone subscribed to this list can (and
> should feel obligated to :-) ) test it, and provide feedback *to _this_
> list*! (Not the mod_python@modpython.org list, and preferably not me
> personally).
>
> The files are (temporarily) available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.2.9.tgz
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.2.9.tgz.md5
>
> Please download it, then do the usual
>
> $ ./configure --with-apxs=/wherever/it/is
> $ make
> $ (su)
> # make install
>
> Then (as non-root user!)
>
> $ cd test
> $ python test.py
>
> And see if any tests fail. If they pass, send a +1 to the list, if they
> fail, send the details (the versions of OS, Apache, Apache-mpm, Python,
> the test output, and suggestions, if any).
>
> Please present your test results in the following format:
> +1 OS version, Apache version (apache mpm), Python Version
>
> For example:
> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
>
> Presenting your information in a consistent format will help in
> tabulating the results. You can include additional information in each
> section, just don't use extra commas. There is no need to include the
> mod_python version in this string as that information is available in
> the email subject. Who knows, one day I may actually write a script to
> extract this information automatically. :)
>
> Thank you for your assistance,
> Jim Gallacher
>
>
>
>
>
Re: mod_python 3.2.9 available for testing
Posted by Ron Reisor <ro...@udel.edu>.
+1 MacOSX 10.4.7 Intel, Apache-2.0.55 (mpm/prefork), Python-2.4.2
cheers,
Ron
Ron Reisor <ro...@udel.edu> (RWR3)
University of Delaware Information Technologies/Network and Systems Services
Computing Center/192 South Chapel Street/Newark DE, 19716
pgp finger print: 0D 73 06 6F D3 6A 99 D3 F5 D5 6E FF 3B B9 7C 2C
Re: mod_python 3.2.9 available for testing
Posted by Jim Gallacher <jp...@jgassociates.ca>.
+1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
Jim Gallacher wrote:
> The mod_python 3.2.9 tarball is available for testing.
>
> This tarball is unchanged from 3.2.9-rc3, but should be retested anyway
> - just in case something went pair-shaped in the process of tagging and
> packaging.
>
> Here are the rules:
>
> In order for a file to be officially announced, it has to be tested by
> developers on the dev list. Anyone subscribed to this list can (and
> should feel obligated to :-) ) test it, and provide feedback *to _this_
> list*! (Not the mod_python@modpython.org list, and preferably not me
> personally).
>
> The files are (temporarily) available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.2.9.tgz
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.2.9.tgz.md5
>
> Please download it, then do the usual
>
> $ ./configure --with-apxs=/wherever/it/is
> $ make
> $ (su)
> # make install
>
> Then (as non-root user!)
>
> $ cd test
> $ python test.py
>
> And see if any tests fail. If they pass, send a +1 to the list, if they
> fail, send the details (the versions of OS, Apache, Apache-mpm, Python,
> the test output, and suggestions, if any).
>
> Please present your test results in the following format:
> +1 OS version, Apache version (apache mpm), Python Version
>
> For example:
> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
>
> Presenting your information in a consistent format will help in
> tabulating the results. You can include additional information in each
> section, just don't use extra commas. There is no need to include the
> mod_python version in this string as that information is available in
> the email subject. Who knows, one day I may actually write a script to
> extract this information automatically. :)
>
> Thank you for your assistance,
> Jim Gallacher
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: mod_python 3.2.9 available for testing
Posted by Graham Dumpleton <gr...@dscpl.com.au>.
+1 MacOSX 10.4.6 PPC, Apache-2.0.55 (mpm/worker), Python-2.3.5
+1 MacOSX 10.4.6 PPC, Apache-2.2.1 (mpm/worker), Python-2.3.5
On 30/06/2006, at 12:52 PM, Jim Gallacher wrote:
> The mod_python 3.2.9 tarball is available for testing.
>
> This tarball is unchanged from 3.2.9-rc3, but should be retested
> anyway
> - just in case something went pair-shaped in the process of tagging
> and
> packaging.
>
> Here are the rules:
>
> In order for a file to be officially announced, it has to be tested by
> developers on the dev list. Anyone subscribed to this list can (and
> should feel obligated to :-) ) test it, and provide feedback *to
> _this_
> list*! (Not the mod_python@modpython.org list, and preferably not me
> personally).
>
> The files are (temporarily) available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/
> mod_python-3.2.9.tgz
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/
> mod_python-3.2.9.tgz.md5
>
> Please download it, then do the usual
>
> $ ./configure --with-apxs=/wherever/it/is
> $ make
> $ (su)
> # make install
>
> Then (as non-root user!)
>
> $ cd test
> $ python test.py
>
> And see if any tests fail. If they pass, send a +1 to the list, if
> they
> fail, send the details (the versions of OS, Apache, Apache-mpm,
> Python,
> the test output, and suggestions, if any).
>
> Please present your test results in the following format:
> +1 OS version, Apache version (apache mpm), Python Version
>
> For example:
> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
>
> Presenting your information in a consistent format will help in
> tabulating the results. You can include additional information in each
> section, just don't use extra commas. There is no need to include the
> mod_python version in this string as that information is available in
> the email subject. Who knows, one day I may actually write a script to
> extract this information automatically. :)
>
> Thank you for your assistance,
> Jim Gallacher
>
>
>
>
Re: mod_python 3.2.9 available for testing
Posted by Nicolas Lehuen <ni...@lehuen.com>.
I've got :
+1 Windows XP SP2, Apache 2.0.58 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4.3
But, and it's my fault for not having tested this for a long time :
-1 Windows XP SP2, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4.3
Only two tests fail but with a segfault, it's test_srv_register_cleanup and
test_apache_register_cleanup. This is not really surprising... I think we
should go ahead and release the 3.2.9 version, while filing a known bug
regarding the fact that we drop the support for those two functions. If we
accept this, then it's a +1.
Regards,
Nicolas
2006/6/30, Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T <je...@dundeemt.com>:
>
> +1 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p2, Apache 2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3
>
> On 6/29/06, Jim Gallacher <jp...@jgassociates.ca> wrote:
> > +1 Linux Ubuntu 6.06 Dapper Drake, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python
> 2.4.3
> >
> > Jim Gallacher wrote:
> > > The mod_python 3.2.9 tarball is available for testing.
> > >
> > > This tarball is unchanged from 3.2.9-rc3, but should be retested
> anyway
> > > - just in case something went pair-shaped in the process of tagging
> and
> > > packaging.
> > >
> > > Here are the rules:
> > >
> > > In order for a file to be officially announced, it has to be tested by
> > > developers on the dev list. Anyone subscribed to this list can (and
> > > should feel obligated to :-) ) test it, and provide feedback *to
> _this_
> > > list*! (Not the mod_python@modpython.org list, and preferably not me
> > > personally).
> > >
> > > The files are (temporarily) available here:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/
> > >
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.2.9.tgz
> > >
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.2.9.tgz.md5
> > >
> > > Please download it, then do the usual
> > >
> > > $ ./configure --with-apxs=/wherever/it/is
> > > $ make
> > > $ (su)
> > > # make install
> > >
> > > Then (as non-root user!)
> > >
> > > $ cd test
> > > $ python test.py
> > >
> > > And see if any tests fail. If they pass, send a +1 to the list, if
> they
> > > fail, send the details (the versions of OS, Apache, Apache-mpm,
> Python,
> > > the test output, and suggestions, if any).
> > >
> > > Please present your test results in the following format:
> > > +1 OS version, Apache version (apache mpm), Python Version
> > >
> > > For example:
> > > +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
> > >
> > > Presenting your information in a consistent format will help in
> > > tabulating the results. You can include additional information in each
> > > section, just don't use extra commas. There is no need to include the
> > > mod_python version in this string as that information is available in
> > > the email subject. Who knows, one day I may actually write a script to
> > > extract this information automatically. :)
> > >
> > > Thank you for your assistance,
> > > Jim Gallacher
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Jeff Hinrichs
> Dundee Media & Technology, Inc
> jeffh@dundeemt.com
> 402.320.0821
>
Re: mod_python 3.2.9 available for testing
Posted by Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T <je...@dundeemt.com>.
+1 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p2, Apache 2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3
On 6/29/06, Jim Gallacher <jp...@jgassociates.ca> wrote:
> +1 Linux Ubuntu 6.06 Dapper Drake, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.3
>
> Jim Gallacher wrote:
> > The mod_python 3.2.9 tarball is available for testing.
> >
> > This tarball is unchanged from 3.2.9-rc3, but should be retested anyway
> > - just in case something went pair-shaped in the process of tagging and
> > packaging.
> >
> > Here are the rules:
> >
> > In order for a file to be officially announced, it has to be tested by
> > developers on the dev list. Anyone subscribed to this list can (and
> > should feel obligated to :-) ) test it, and provide feedback *to _this_
> > list*! (Not the mod_python@modpython.org list, and preferably not me
> > personally).
> >
> > The files are (temporarily) available here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/
> > http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.2.9.tgz
> > http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.2.9.tgz.md5
> >
> > Please download it, then do the usual
> >
> > $ ./configure --with-apxs=/wherever/it/is
> > $ make
> > $ (su)
> > # make install
> >
> > Then (as non-root user!)
> >
> > $ cd test
> > $ python test.py
> >
> > And see if any tests fail. If they pass, send a +1 to the list, if they
> > fail, send the details (the versions of OS, Apache, Apache-mpm, Python,
> > the test output, and suggestions, if any).
> >
> > Please present your test results in the following format:
> > +1 OS version, Apache version (apache mpm), Python Version
> >
> > For example:
> > +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
> >
> > Presenting your information in a consistent format will help in
> > tabulating the results. You can include additional information in each
> > section, just don't use extra commas. There is no need to include the
> > mod_python version in this string as that information is available in
> > the email subject. Who knows, one day I may actually write a script to
> > extract this information automatically. :)
> >
> > Thank you for your assistance,
> > Jim Gallacher
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
--
Jeff Hinrichs
Dundee Media & Technology, Inc
jeffh@dundeemt.com
402.320.0821
Re: mod_python 3.2.9 available for testing
Posted by Jim Gallacher <jp...@jgassociates.ca>.
+1 Linux Ubuntu 6.06 Dapper Drake, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.3
Jim Gallacher wrote:
> The mod_python 3.2.9 tarball is available for testing.
>
> This tarball is unchanged from 3.2.9-rc3, but should be retested anyway
> - just in case something went pair-shaped in the process of tagging and
> packaging.
>
> Here are the rules:
>
> In order for a file to be officially announced, it has to be tested by
> developers on the dev list. Anyone subscribed to this list can (and
> should feel obligated to :-) ) test it, and provide feedback *to _this_
> list*! (Not the mod_python@modpython.org list, and preferably not me
> personally).
>
> The files are (temporarily) available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.2.9.tgz
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.2.9.tgz.md5
>
> Please download it, then do the usual
>
> $ ./configure --with-apxs=/wherever/it/is
> $ make
> $ (su)
> # make install
>
> Then (as non-root user!)
>
> $ cd test
> $ python test.py
>
> And see if any tests fail. If they pass, send a +1 to the list, if they
> fail, send the details (the versions of OS, Apache, Apache-mpm, Python,
> the test output, and suggestions, if any).
>
> Please present your test results in the following format:
> +1 OS version, Apache version (apache mpm), Python Version
>
> For example:
> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
>
> Presenting your information in a consistent format will help in
> tabulating the results. You can include additional information in each
> section, just don't use extra commas. There is no need to include the
> mod_python version in this string as that information is available in
> the email subject. Who knows, one day I may actually write a script to
> extract this information automatically. :)
>
> Thank you for your assistance,
> Jim Gallacher
>
>
>
>
>
>