You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu> on 2016/03/25 00:07:44 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)
Hi all,
The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a proposal
to release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-incubating.
PPMC Vote Call:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-freemarker-dev/201603.mbox/%3C425840806.20160321000209%40freemail.hu%3E
PPMC Vote Result:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-freemarker-dev/201603.mbox/%3C741952438.20160324230601%40freemail.hu%3E
PPMC Vote Summary:
4 binding +1 votes
2 non-binding +1 votes
Release Notes:
http://freemarker.org/builds/2.3.24-unvoted/_html/versions_2_3_24.html
Before proceed, you should know that FreeMarker 2.3.x, for a long
time, always releases a normal and a "gae" variant on the same time,
which are technically two independent source trees (Git branches). The
"gae" variant contains a few small modification in the Java source
code to be Google App Engine compliant, and has freemarker-gae as the
Maven artifact name. Otherwise the normal and the "gae" branches are
identical. Hence, they are voted on together.
The commits to be voted upon are:
- Normal (non-gae) variant:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-freemarker.git;a=commit;h=4a723fc1e89c3f258b00e6ee40ba3c60d076aa89
Commit hash: 4a723fc1e89c3f258b00e6ee40ba3c60d076aa89
- "gae" variant:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-freemarker.git;a=commit;h=4b8df1fd03c21495e646ac1721734811564317f5
Commit hash: 4b8df1fd03c21495e646ac1721734811564317f5
The artifacts to be voted upon are located here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/freemarker/engine/2.3.24-incubating/source/
where the source release artifacts are:
- Normal (non-gae) variant:
apache-freemarker-2.3.24-incubating-src.tar.gz
- "gae" variant:
apache-freemarker-gae-2.3.24-incubating-src.tar.gz
See the README inside them for build instructions!
Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ddekany.asc
Note that for convenience, we also provide binaries:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/freemarker/engine/2.3.24-incubating/binaries/
and Maven artifacts in the ASF staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/org/freemarker/
We request the permission of IPMC to publish the above release as
Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-incubating. Please try out the package and
vote.
The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number of
votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-incubating
[ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding.
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Copying my +1 (binding) vote from the dev@ list here.
Release contents look good.
John
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:07 PM Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a proposal
> to release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-incubating.
>
> PPMC Vote Call:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-freemarker-dev/201603.mbox/%3C425840806.20160321000209%40freemail.hu%3E
>
> PPMC Vote Result:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-freemarker-dev/201603.mbox/%3C741952438.20160324230601%40freemail.hu%3E
>
> PPMC Vote Summary:
> 4 binding +1 votes
> 2 non-binding +1 votes
>
> Release Notes:
> http://freemarker.org/builds/2.3.24-unvoted/_html/versions_2_3_24.html
>
> Before proceed, you should know that FreeMarker 2.3.x, for a long
> time, always releases a normal and a "gae" variant on the same time,
> which are technically two independent source trees (Git branches). The
> "gae" variant contains a few small modification in the Java source
> code to be Google App Engine compliant, and has freemarker-gae as the
> Maven artifact name. Otherwise the normal and the "gae" branches are
> identical. Hence, they are voted on together.
>
> The commits to be voted upon are:
> - Normal (non-gae) variant:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-freemarker.git;a=commit;h=4a723fc1e89c3f258b00e6ee40ba3c60d076aa89
> Commit hash: 4a723fc1e89c3f258b00e6ee40ba3c60d076aa89
> - "gae" variant:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-freemarker.git;a=commit;h=4b8df1fd03c21495e646ac1721734811564317f5
> Commit hash: 4b8df1fd03c21495e646ac1721734811564317f5
>
> The artifacts to be voted upon are located here:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/freemarker/engine/2.3.24-incubating/source/
> where the source release artifacts are:
> - Normal (non-gae) variant:
> apache-freemarker-2.3.24-incubating-src.tar.gz
> - "gae" variant:
> apache-freemarker-gae-2.3.24-incubating-src.tar.gz
>
> See the README inside them for build instructions!
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ddekany.asc
>
> Note that for convenience, we also provide binaries:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/freemarker/engine/2.3.24-incubating/binaries/
> and Maven artifacts in the ASF staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/org/freemarker/
>
> We request the permission of IPMC to publish the above release as
> Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-incubating. Please try out the package and
> vote.
>
> The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number of
> votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-incubating
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Daniel Dekany
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
Changing my vote to:
+1 (binding)
> You mean src/main/misc/overloadedNumberRules/prices.ods and
> src/manual/en_US/docgen-originals/figures/overview.odg? As they don't
> have copyright headers (because they are binaries), I thought I have
> to indicate their license somewhere.
The LICENSE file would be a better place for this.
> Many years ago these originally Sun Microsystems licensed files
> started to appear in Apache Tomcat with Apache license.
I did a bit of hunting and found a few conversations on legal and this [1].
Thanks,
Justin
1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-91
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
For completeness, here's the links to Tomcat's copy of the DTD files
https://github.com/apache/tomcat80/blob/trunk/java/javax/servlet/resources/web-app_2_3.dtd
https://github.com/apache/tomcat80/blob/trunk/java/javax/servlet/resources/web-app_2_2.dtd
https://github.com/apache/tomcat80/blob/trunk/java/javax/servlet/resources/web-jsptaglibrary_1_1.dtd
https://github.com/apache/tomcat80/blob/trunk/java/javax/servlet/resources/web-jsptaglibrary_1_2.dtd
John
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 10:26 AM Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu> wrote:
> Friday, March 25, 2016, 10:54:22 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > -1 (binding) due to category B license in source.
>
> I believe they are under the Apache License, Version 2.0, and so
> aren't category B, but see later.
>
> > As these file are
> > mention in NOTICE there’s probably a reason for this but it’s unclear to
> me.
> >
> > I checked:
> > - incubating in name
> > - signatures good but form a non apache email
>
> (Yes, I will create another signature sooner or later. The current
> signature is used for releases for several years now.)
>
> > - LICENSE is good
> > - NOTICE has unneeded information in it
> > - DISCLAIMER exists
> > - No unexpected binary files, but no sure why 2 files are mentioned
> > in NOTICE. IF these field are covered by an Apache license there
> > should be no need to put them in NOTICE.
>
> You mean src/main/misc/overloadedNumberRules/prices.ods and
> src/manual/en_US/docgen-originals/figures/overview.odg? As they don't
> have copyright headers (because they are binaries), I thought I have
> to indicate their license somewhere.
>
> > - Can compile from source
> >
> > Can you provide some details on these files. This files have Apache
> > headers on them but as far as I can tell the originals are CDDL/GPU
> > which is category B and not allowed to be included in a source release.
> > src/main/resources/freemarker/ext/jsp/web-app_2_2.dtd
> > src/main/resources/freemarker/ext/jsp/web-app_2_3.dtd
> > src/main/resources/freemarker/ext/jsp/web-jsptaglibrary_1_1.dtd
> > src/main/resources/freemarker/ext/jsp/web-jsptaglibrary_1_2.dtd
> >
> > For original license see [1][2][3]. I’m not sure how the first file is
> licensed.
>
> Many years ago these originally Sun Microsystems licensed files
> started to appear in Apache Tomcat with Apache license. That's where
> they came from. You can find them in Apache Tomcat 7 binary
> distribution (among others), inside lib/servlet-api.jar and
> lib/jsp-api.jar. They are exactly the same as those included in
> FreeMarker (ignoring possible line ending CRLF versus LF differences).
>
> > Thanks,
> > Justin
> >
> > 1. http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-app_2_3.dtd
> > 2. http://java.sun.com/j2ee/dtds/web-jsptaglibrary_1_1.dtd
> > 3.http://java.sun.com/j2ee/dtds/web-jsptaglibrary_1_2.dtd
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Daniel Dekany
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)
Posted by Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu>.
Friday, March 25, 2016, 10:54:22 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> -1 (binding) due to category B license in source.
I believe they are under the Apache License, Version 2.0, and so
aren't category B, but see later.
> As these file are
> mention in NOTICE there’s probably a reason for this but it’s unclear to me.
>
> I checked:
> - incubating in name
> - signatures good but form a non apache email
(Yes, I will create another signature sooner or later. The current
signature is used for releases for several years now.)
> - LICENSE is good
> - NOTICE has unneeded information in it
> - DISCLAIMER exists
> - No unexpected binary files, but no sure why 2 files are mentioned
> in NOTICE. IF these field are covered by an Apache license there
> should be no need to put them in NOTICE.
You mean src/main/misc/overloadedNumberRules/prices.ods and
src/manual/en_US/docgen-originals/figures/overview.odg? As they don't
have copyright headers (because they are binaries), I thought I have
to indicate their license somewhere.
> - Can compile from source
>
> Can you provide some details on these files. This files have Apache
> headers on them but as far as I can tell the originals are CDDL/GPU
> which is category B and not allowed to be included in a source release.
> src/main/resources/freemarker/ext/jsp/web-app_2_2.dtd
> src/main/resources/freemarker/ext/jsp/web-app_2_3.dtd
> src/main/resources/freemarker/ext/jsp/web-jsptaglibrary_1_1.dtd
> src/main/resources/freemarker/ext/jsp/web-jsptaglibrary_1_2.dtd
>
> For original license see [1][2][3]. I’m not sure how the first file is licensed.
Many years ago these originally Sun Microsystems licensed files
started to appear in Apache Tomcat with Apache license. That's where
they came from. You can find them in Apache Tomcat 7 binary
distribution (among others), inside lib/servlet-api.jar and
lib/jsp-api.jar. They are exactly the same as those included in
FreeMarker (ignoring possible line ending CRLF versus LF differences).
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1. http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-app_2_3.dtd
> 2. http://java.sun.com/j2ee/dtds/web-jsptaglibrary_1_1.dtd
> 3.http://java.sun.com/j2ee/dtds/web-jsptaglibrary_1_2.dtd
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@me.com>.
Hi,
> Would you be comfortable for letting this be fixed next release Justin?
The binary files are OKish. It's more the license I’m concerned about - do we know the history / what’s going on there?
Thanks,
Justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@gmail.com>.
Would you be comfortable for letting this be fixed next release Justin?
I raised this on the dev list when the vote came up -
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-freemarker-dev/201603.mbox/%3C601980662.20160322084059%40freemail.hu%3E
John
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 5:54 PM Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> -1 (binding) due to category B license in source. As these file are
> mention in NOTICE there’s probably a reason for this but it’s unclear to me.
>
> I checked:
> - incubating in name
> - signatures good but form a non apache email
> - LICENSE is good
> - NOTICE has unneeded information in it
> - DISCLAIMER exists
> - No unexpected binary files, but no sure why 2 files are mentioned in
> NOTICE. IF these field are covered by an Apache license there should be no
> need to put them in NOTICE.
> - Can compile from source
>
> Can you provide some details on these files. This files have Apache
> headers on them but as far as I can tell the originals are CDDL/GPU which
> is category B and not allowed to be included in a source release.
> src/main/resources/freemarker/ext/jsp/web-app_2_2.dtd
> src/main/resources/freemarker/ext/jsp/web-app_2_3.dtd
> src/main/resources/freemarker/ext/jsp/web-jsptaglibrary_1_1.dtd
> src/main/resources/freemarker/ext/jsp/web-jsptaglibrary_1_2.dtd
>
> For original license see [1][2][3]. I’m not sure how the first file is
> licensed.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1. http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-app_2_3.dtd
> 2. http://java.sun.com/j2ee/dtds/web-jsptaglibrary_1_1.dtd
> 3.http://java.sun.com/j2ee/dtds/web-jsptaglibrary_1_2.dtd
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
-1 (binding) due to category B license in source. As these file are mention in NOTICE there’s probably a reason for this but it’s unclear to me.
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures good but form a non apache email
- LICENSE is good
- NOTICE has unneeded information in it
- DISCLAIMER exists
- No unexpected binary files, but no sure why 2 files are mentioned in NOTICE. IF these field are covered by an Apache license there should be no need to put them in NOTICE.
- Can compile from source
Can you provide some details on these files. This files have Apache headers on them but as far as I can tell the originals are CDDL/GPU which is category B and not allowed to be included in a source release.
src/main/resources/freemarker/ext/jsp/web-app_2_2.dtd
src/main/resources/freemarker/ext/jsp/web-app_2_3.dtd
src/main/resources/freemarker/ext/jsp/web-jsptaglibrary_1_1.dtd
src/main/resources/freemarker/ext/jsp/web-jsptaglibrary_1_2.dtd
For original license see [1][2][3]. I’m not sure how the first file is licensed.
Thanks,
Justin
1. http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-app_2_3.dtd
2. http://java.sun.com/j2ee/dtds/web-jsptaglibrary_1_1.dtd
3.http://java.sun.com/j2ee/dtds/web-jsptaglibrary_1_2.dtd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)
Posted by Jacopo Cappellato <ja...@gmail.com>.
Copying my +1 (binding) vote from the dev@ list here.
Jacopo Cappellato
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 03/25/2016 12:07 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a proposal
>> to release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-incubating.
>>
>> PPMC Vote Call:
>>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-freemarker-dev/201603.mbox/%3C425840806.20160321000209%40freemail.hu%3E
>>
>> PPMC Vote Result:
>>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-freemarker-dev/201603.mbox/%3C741952438.20160324230601%40freemail.hu%3E
>>
>> PPMC Vote Summary:
>> 4 binding +1 votes
>> 2 non-binding +1 votes
>>
>> Release Notes:
>> http://freemarker.org/builds/2.3.24-unvoted/_html/versions_2_3_24.html
>>
>> Before proceed, you should know that FreeMarker 2.3.x, for a long
>> time, always releases a normal and a "gae" variant on the same time,
>> which are technically two independent source trees (Git branches). The
>> "gae" variant contains a few small modification in the Java source
>> code to be Google App Engine compliant, and has freemarker-gae as the
>> Maven artifact name. Otherwise the normal and the "gae" branches are
>> identical. Hence, they are voted on together.
>>
>> The commits to be voted upon are:
>> - Normal (non-gae) variant:
>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-freemarker.git;a=commit;h=4a723fc1e89c3f258b00e6ee40ba3c60d076aa89
>> Commit hash: 4a723fc1e89c3f258b00e6ee40ba3c60d076aa89
>> - "gae" variant:
>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-freemarker.git;a=commit;h=4b8df1fd03c21495e646ac1721734811564317f5
>> Commit hash: 4b8df1fd03c21495e646ac1721734811564317f5
>>
>> The artifacts to be voted upon are located here:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/freemarker/engine/2.3.24-incubating/source/
>> where the source release artifacts are:
>> - Normal (non-gae) variant:
>> apache-freemarker-2.3.24-incubating-src.tar.gz
>> - "gae" variant:
>> apache-freemarker-gae-2.3.24-incubating-src.tar.gz
>>
>> See the README inside them for build instructions!
>>
>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ddekany.asc
>>
>> Note that for convenience, we also provide binaries:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/freemarker/engine/2.3.24-incubating/binaries/
>> and Maven artifacts in the ASF staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/org/freemarker/
>>
>> We request the permission of IPMC to publish the above release as
>> Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-incubating. Please try out the package and
>> vote.
>>
>> The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number
>> of
>> votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-incubating
>> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>
>> Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding.
>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 03/25/2016 12:07 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a proposal
> to release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-incubating.
>
> PPMC Vote Call:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-freemarker-dev/201603.mbox/%3C425840806.20160321000209%40freemail.hu%3E
>
> PPMC Vote Result:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-freemarker-dev/201603.mbox/%3C741952438.20160324230601%40freemail.hu%3E
>
> PPMC Vote Summary:
> 4 binding +1 votes
> 2 non-binding +1 votes
>
> Release Notes:
> http://freemarker.org/builds/2.3.24-unvoted/_html/versions_2_3_24.html
>
> Before proceed, you should know that FreeMarker 2.3.x, for a long
> time, always releases a normal and a "gae" variant on the same time,
> which are technically two independent source trees (Git branches). The
> "gae" variant contains a few small modification in the Java source
> code to be Google App Engine compliant, and has freemarker-gae as the
> Maven artifact name. Otherwise the normal and the "gae" branches are
> identical. Hence, they are voted on together.
>
> The commits to be voted upon are:
> - Normal (non-gae) variant:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-freemarker.git;a=commit;h=4a723fc1e89c3f258b00e6ee40ba3c60d076aa89
> Commit hash: 4a723fc1e89c3f258b00e6ee40ba3c60d076aa89
> - "gae" variant:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-freemarker.git;a=commit;h=4b8df1fd03c21495e646ac1721734811564317f5
> Commit hash: 4b8df1fd03c21495e646ac1721734811564317f5
>
> The artifacts to be voted upon are located here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/freemarker/engine/2.3.24-incubating/source/
> where the source release artifacts are:
> - Normal (non-gae) variant:
> apache-freemarker-2.3.24-incubating-src.tar.gz
> - "gae" variant:
> apache-freemarker-gae-2.3.24-incubating-src.tar.gz
>
> See the README inside them for build instructions!
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ddekany.asc
>
> Note that for convenience, we also provide binaries:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/freemarker/engine/2.3.24-incubating/binaries/
> and Maven artifacts in the ASF staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/org/freemarker/
>
> We request the permission of IPMC to publish the above release as
> Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-incubating. Please try out the package and
> vote.
>
> The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number of
> votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-incubating
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding.
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 8:53 PM Marvin Humphrey <ma...@rectangular.com>
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
> wrote:
>
> > From memory it was that they are not automatically transferred (but I
> could
> > be wrong). Otherwise podlings could skip voting on the incubator list
> > altogether if they had 3 +1 votes on the dev list. IMO It’s not exactly
> hard
> > for IPMC member to vote in both places to make things clearer.
>
> Ah, now I understand where you're coming from.
>
> Other IPMC members must be given the opportunity to inspect a release, so
> the
> vote on general@incubator cannot be skipped. However, IPMC votes can be
> "carried over", by tradition, from the podling dev list.
>
Yes, and most recently we have had issues with two podlings attempting to
use this as a way to not even hold a vote on the incubator list. Those
were corrected.
>
> Marvin Humphrey
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)
Posted by Marvin Humphrey <ma...@rectangular.com>.
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
> From memory it was that they are not automatically transferred (but I could
> be wrong). Otherwise podlings could skip voting on the incubator list
> altogether if they had 3 +1 votes on the dev list. IMO It’s not exactly hard
> for IPMC member to vote in both places to make things clearer.
Ah, now I understand where you're coming from.
Other IPMC members must be given the opportunity to inspect a release, so the
vote on general@incubator cannot be skipped. However, IPMC votes can be
"carried over", by tradition, from the podling dev list.
Marvin Humphrey
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> This has come up before, and I believe the last consensus was that votes on
> the dev lists automatically transferred.
From memory it was that they are not automatically transferred (but I could be wrong). Otherwise podlings could skip voting on the incubator list altogether if they had 3 +1 votes on the dev list. IMO It’s not exactly hard for IPMC member to vote in both places to make things clearer.
Thanks,
Justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 8:34 PM Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> No a big deal (as it passed), but only votes on the incubator list by the
> incubator PMC are binding.
>
This has come up before, and I believe the last consensus was that votes on
the dev lists automatically transferred.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> There's been a long tradition in the Incubator of "carrying over" IPMC
> votes from the podling dev list. And let's consider why -- is there
> really a benefit to having IPMC members cast votes twice
Yes it’s then clear on the this list how many +1 votes there currently is before the results are announced. I for instance may not look at a vote until someone more familiar with the project has voted on it. If 3 or more +1 are “hidden" on the dev list then a vote may pass without any IPMC member outside ether project giving it the once over.As have been shown many times there’s sometime things that IPMC people outside the project may pick up that the project has missed. And what about non +1 other votes, for instance do -1 or +0 carry over as well?
> Would we ever want to block a release that had 2 IPMC votes on
> general@incubator and 1 cast only on the podling dev list?
Has this happened? It could be easily solved if it did come up i.e. by voting on the IPMC list.
> I think it makes sense for the Release Manager list the IPMC votes
> being carried over,
Perhaps in the initial IPMC vote and not just only in the results would be better?
Thanks,
Justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)
Posted by Marvin Humphrey <ma...@rectangular.com>.
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> No a big deal (as it passed), but only votes on the incubator list by the incubator PMC are binding.
Hi Justin,
There's been a long tradition in the Incubator of "carrying over" IPMC
votes from the podling dev list. And let's consider why -- is there
really a benefit to having IPMC members cast votes twice, or a
drawback to having them not cast a vote which obviously has the same
value? Would we ever want to block a release that had 2 IPMC votes on
general@incubator and 1 cast only on the podling dev list?
I think it makes sense for the Release Manager list the IPMC votes
being carried over, because then it is more apparent when a release is
lacking IPMC votes. However, that's just a recommendation -- even if
they don't do that, the IPMC votes can be counted.
Marvin Humphrey
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
No a big deal (as it passed), but only votes on the incubator list by the incubator PMC are binding.
Thanks,
Justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)
Posted by Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu>.
The vote for releasing Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating) passed
with 5 binding "+1" votes, and no "0" or "-1" votes.
Binding votes:
Jacopo Cappellato +1
Jean-Baptiste Onofré +1
John D. Ament +1
Justin Mclean +1
Sergio Fernández +1 (voted on dev@freemarker.incubator.apache.org only)
Non-binding votes (on dev@freemarker.incubator.apache.org only):
Daniel Dekany +1
David E Jones +1
Evangelia Dendramis +1
Thanks to those who were able to take the time to vote.
Friday, March 25, 2016, 1:07:44 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a proposal
> to release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-incubating.
>
> PPMC Vote Call:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-freemarker-dev/201603.mbox/%3C425840806.20160321000209%40freemail.hu%3E
>
> PPMC Vote Result:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-freemarker-dev/201603.mbox/%3C741952438.20160324230601%40freemail.hu%3E
>
> PPMC Vote Summary:
> 4 binding +1 votes
> 2 non-binding +1 votes
>
> Release Notes:
> http://freemarker.org/builds/2.3.24-unvoted/_html/versions_2_3_24.html
>
> Before proceed, you should know that FreeMarker 2.3.x, for a long
> time, always releases a normal and a "gae" variant on the same time,
> which are technically two independent source trees (Git branches). The
> "gae" variant contains a few small modification in the Java source
> code to be Google App Engine compliant, and has freemarker-gae as the
> Maven artifact name. Otherwise the normal and the "gae" branches are
> identical. Hence, they are voted on together.
>
> The commits to be voted upon are:
> - Normal (non-gae) variant:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-freemarker.git;a=commit;h=4a723fc1e89c3f258b00e6ee40ba3c60d076aa89
> Commit hash: 4a723fc1e89c3f258b00e6ee40ba3c60d076aa89
> - "gae" variant:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-freemarker.git;a=commit;h=4b8df1fd03c21495e646ac1721734811564317f5
> Commit hash: 4b8df1fd03c21495e646ac1721734811564317f5
>
> The artifacts to be voted upon are located here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/freemarker/engine/2.3.24-incubating/source/
> where the source release artifacts are:
> - Normal (non-gae) variant:
> apache-freemarker-2.3.24-incubating-src.tar.gz
> - "gae" variant:
> apache-freemarker-gae-2.3.24-incubating-src.tar.gz
>
> See the README inside them for build instructions!
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ddekany.asc
>
> Note that for convenience, we also provide binaries:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/freemarker/engine/2.3.24-incubating/binaries/
> and Maven artifacts in the ASF staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/org/freemarker/
>
> We request the permission of IPMC to publish the above release as
> Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-incubating. Please try out the package and
> vote.
>
> The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number of
> votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-incubating
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding.
>
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org