You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@deltaspike.apache.org by hantsy <ha...@yahoo.com.cn> on 2013/05/01 13:53:02 UTC
Any plan to adopt Java EE 7
Hi,
I noticed Java EE 7 got approval, is there any plan to support Java EE 7.
And for JSF 2.2, the Converter, Validator , UIComponent, all listeners
still do not support CDI @Inject. Personally it is a big
disappointment. And other two "big" features introduced in JSF2.2,
resource contract and flow, I also have no interest.
Especially the flow, the definition is very tedious, I hope Apache
Deltaspike can pick up the simple @ConversationScoped and @Begin @End
annotations in Seam 2 to implement a simple page flow solution .
BTW, in the vote page, I found the status of Redhat is "not voted",
what this means?
Hantsy
--
Fulltime Java EE Freelancer from China
Re: Any plan to adopt Java EE 7
Posted by Anil Saldhana <an...@gmail.com>.
On May 2, 2013, at 7:35 AM, hantsy <ha...@yahoo.com.cn> wrote:
> yes, I means the vote of ee7.
>
> I just get the post on jboss.org,
> http://planet.jboss.org/post/ee7_is_approved.
>
> Mark Little explained the vote result. When I saw the result, I had
> thought weather there were some conflict between RedHat and Oracle, now
> it seems my mistake.
Unless you have a full time standards voting person employed, it is going to be very tricky. Particularly when there are multiple standards to vote on, you do not know which ones you have missed. Plus people are always traveling and reminder emails go to spam folder etc.
Also I am unsure if the EE leads kept the reminder button pressed.
>
> Hantsy
> On 5/1/2013 23:15, Gerhard Petracek wrote:
>> yes - for ee7 (the vote for jsf 2.2 is fine).
>>
>> regards,
>> gerhard
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/5/1 Jason Porter <li...@gmail.com>
>>
>>> That means the rep for Red Hat didn't vote in the specified time of the
>>> vote.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Gerhard Petracek <
>>> gerhard.petracek@gmail.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>> hi hantsy,
>>>>
>>>> see chapter 5.4.1 of jsr-344 (and the vote you mentioned is fine as
>>> well).
>>>> regards,
>>>> gerhard
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2013/5/1 hantsy <ha...@yahoo.com.cn>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I noticed Java EE 7 got approval, is there any plan to support Java EE
>>> 7.
>>>>> And for JSF 2.2, the Converter, Validator , UIComponent, all listeners
>>>>> still do not support CDI @Inject. Personally it is a big
>>>>> disappointment. And other two "big" features introduced in JSF2.2,
>>>>> resource contract and flow, I also have no interest.
>>>>>
>>>>> Especially the flow, the definition is very tedious, I hope Apache
>>>>> Deltaspike can pick up the simple @ConversationScoped and @Begin @End
>>>>> annotations in Seam 2 to implement a simple page flow solution .
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW, in the vote page, I found the status of Redhat is "not voted",
>>>>> what this means?
>>>>>
>>>>> Hantsy
>>>>> --
>>>>> Fulltime Java EE Freelancer from China
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jason Porter
>>> http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp
>
> --
> Fulltime Java EE Freelancer from China
Re: Any plan to adopt Java EE 7
Posted by hantsy <ha...@yahoo.com.cn>.
yes, I means the vote of ee7.
I just get the post on jboss.org,
http://planet.jboss.org/post/ee7_is_approved.
Mark Little explained the vote result. When I saw the result, I had
thought weather there were some conflict between RedHat and Oracle, now
it seems my mistake.
Hantsy
On 5/1/2013 23:15, Gerhard Petracek wrote:
> yes - for ee7 (the vote for jsf 2.2 is fine).
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2013/5/1 Jason Porter <li...@gmail.com>
>
>> That means the rep for Red Hat didn't vote in the specified time of the
>> vote.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Gerhard Petracek <
>> gerhard.petracek@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>> hi hantsy,
>>>
>>> see chapter 5.4.1 of jsr-344 (and the vote you mentioned is fine as
>> well).
>>> regards,
>>> gerhard
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/5/1 hantsy <ha...@yahoo.com.cn>
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I noticed Java EE 7 got approval, is there any plan to support Java EE
>> 7.
>>>> And for JSF 2.2, the Converter, Validator , UIComponent, all listeners
>>>> still do not support CDI @Inject. Personally it is a big
>>>> disappointment. And other two "big" features introduced in JSF2.2,
>>>> resource contract and flow, I also have no interest.
>>>>
>>>> Especially the flow, the definition is very tedious, I hope Apache
>>>> Deltaspike can pick up the simple @ConversationScoped and @Begin @End
>>>> annotations in Seam 2 to implement a simple page flow solution .
>>>>
>>>> BTW, in the vote page, I found the status of Redhat is "not voted",
>>>> what this means?
>>>>
>>>> Hantsy
>>>> --
>>>> Fulltime Java EE Freelancer from China
>>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jason Porter
>> http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp
>>
--
Fulltime Java EE Freelancer from China
Re: Any plan to adopt Java EE 7
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>.
yes - for ee7 (the vote for jsf 2.2 is fine).
regards,
gerhard
2013/5/1 Jason Porter <li...@gmail.com>
> That means the rep for Red Hat didn't vote in the specified time of the
> vote.
>
>
> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Gerhard Petracek <
> gerhard.petracek@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > hi hantsy,
> >
> > see chapter 5.4.1 of jsr-344 (and the vote you mentioned is fine as
> well).
> >
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/5/1 hantsy <ha...@yahoo.com.cn>
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I noticed Java EE 7 got approval, is there any plan to support Java EE
> 7.
> > >
> > > And for JSF 2.2, the Converter, Validator , UIComponent, all listeners
> > > still do not support CDI @Inject. Personally it is a big
> > > disappointment. And other two "big" features introduced in JSF2.2,
> > > resource contract and flow, I also have no interest.
> > >
> > > Especially the flow, the definition is very tedious, I hope Apache
> > > Deltaspike can pick up the simple @ConversationScoped and @Begin @End
> > > annotations in Seam 2 to implement a simple page flow solution .
> > >
> > > BTW, in the vote page, I found the status of Redhat is "not voted",
> > > what this means?
> > >
> > > Hantsy
> > > --
> > > Fulltime Java EE Freelancer from China
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jason Porter
> http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp
>
Re: Any plan to adopt Java EE 7
Posted by Jason Porter <li...@gmail.com>.
That means the rep for Red Hat didn't vote in the specified time of the
vote.
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com
> wrote:
> hi hantsy,
>
> see chapter 5.4.1 of jsr-344 (and the vote you mentioned is fine as well).
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2013/5/1 hantsy <ha...@yahoo.com.cn>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I noticed Java EE 7 got approval, is there any plan to support Java EE 7.
> >
> > And for JSF 2.2, the Converter, Validator , UIComponent, all listeners
> > still do not support CDI @Inject. Personally it is a big
> > disappointment. And other two "big" features introduced in JSF2.2,
> > resource contract and flow, I also have no interest.
> >
> > Especially the flow, the definition is very tedious, I hope Apache
> > Deltaspike can pick up the simple @ConversationScoped and @Begin @End
> > annotations in Seam 2 to implement a simple page flow solution .
> >
> > BTW, in the vote page, I found the status of Redhat is "not voted",
> > what this means?
> >
> > Hantsy
> > --
> > Fulltime Java EE Freelancer from China
> >
>
--
Jason Porter
http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp
Re: Any plan to adopt Java EE 7
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>.
short addition:
some parts were postponed (in the final version of the spec.).
however, at myfaces we are currently working on it.
i'll port whatever is useful, once we are done.
regards,
gerhard
2013/5/1 Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>
> hi hantsy,
>
> see chapter 5.4.1 of jsr-344 (and the vote you mentioned is fine as well).
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2013/5/1 hantsy <ha...@yahoo.com.cn>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I noticed Java EE 7 got approval, is there any plan to support Java EE 7.
>>
>> And for JSF 2.2, the Converter, Validator , UIComponent, all listeners
>> still do not support CDI @Inject. Personally it is a big
>> disappointment. And other two "big" features introduced in JSF2.2,
>> resource contract and flow, I also have no interest.
>>
>> Especially the flow, the definition is very tedious, I hope Apache
>> Deltaspike can pick up the simple @ConversationScoped and @Begin @End
>> annotations in Seam 2 to implement a simple page flow solution .
>>
>> BTW, in the vote page, I found the status of Redhat is "not voted",
>> what this means?
>>
>> Hantsy
>> --
>> Fulltime Java EE Freelancer from China
>>
>
>
Re: Any plan to adopt Java EE 7
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>.
hi hantsy,
see chapter 5.4.1 of jsr-344 (and the vote you mentioned is fine as well).
regards,
gerhard
2013/5/1 hantsy <ha...@yahoo.com.cn>
> Hi,
>
> I noticed Java EE 7 got approval, is there any plan to support Java EE 7.
>
> And for JSF 2.2, the Converter, Validator , UIComponent, all listeners
> still do not support CDI @Inject. Personally it is a big
> disappointment. And other two "big" features introduced in JSF2.2,
> resource contract and flow, I also have no interest.
>
> Especially the flow, the definition is very tedious, I hope Apache
> Deltaspike can pick up the simple @ConversationScoped and @Begin @End
> annotations in Seam 2 to implement a simple page flow solution .
>
> BTW, in the vote page, I found the status of Redhat is "not voted",
> what this means?
>
> Hantsy
> --
> Fulltime Java EE Freelancer from China
>