SessionStore and Detachable Models

[carloc <ca...@yahoo.com>]

	hi everyone, 

if i use the secondlevelcachesessionstore wicket writes session state into
the disk
instead of the httpsession right? It is also the one that is used by
default.

so is it safe for me to not use abstractdetachablemodels and just use
compoundpropertymodels since memory is not that big a concern anymore
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SessionStore-and-Detachable-Models-tp19548105p19548105.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org

Re: SessionStore and Detachable Models

[James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>]

You should use LoadableDetachableModel where possible to avoid stale
data (and to preserve memory).

On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 4:14 AM, carloc <ca...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>        hi everyone,
>
> if i use the secondlevelcachesessionstore wicket writes session state into
> the disk
> instead of the httpsession right? It is also the one that is used by
> default.
>
> so is it safe for me to not use abstractdetachablemodels and just use
> compoundpropertymodels since memory is not that big a concern anymore
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SessionStore-and-Detachable-Models-tp19548105p19548105.html
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org