You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@royale.apache.org by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org> on 2020/04/26 14:34:59 UTC

Two way databinding question in SOF

Hi,

someone can respond this new question on SOF [1]?

I can't say nothing about it than "we don't support it", but maybe others
can give some light about plans for two way data binding.

[1]
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61409429/does-apache-royale-support-two-way-data-binding-now

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Re: Two way databinding question in SOF

Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
I just responded to this question in SOF with the info provided here

El lun., 27 abr. 2020 a las 18:22, Carlos Rovira (<ca...@apache.org>)
escribió:

> Ok Piotr,
>
> thanks for letting us know. Very useful.
> Hope someday someone wants to make this more "flex" reducing the typing to
> just "@" ;)
>
>
> El lun., 27 abr. 2020 a las 14:22, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> Two way binding is possible using following notation in MXML
>>
>> <fx:Binding source="voObj.firstName" destination="myTextInput.text" />
>> <fx:Binding source=" myTextInput .text" destination=" voObj .firstName" />
>>
>> It doesn't work always. There are some issues. I have reported them
>> somewhere. I hope some day Greg will look into that.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr
>>
>> pon., 27 kwi 2020 o 10:45 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
>> napisał(a):
>>
>> > Thanks Andrew and Alex,
>> >
>> > @Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>, can you please respond to Yu
>> Taro
>> > as
>> > you do the doc changes?
>> >
>> > thanks in advance!
>> >
>> > El dom., 26 abr. 2020 a las 19:37, Alex Harui (<aharui@adobe.com.invalid
>> >)
>> > escribió:
>> >
>> > > IMO, the answer should be some variant of the usual “we need
>> volunteers
>> > to
>> > > make it happen”.  I can’t immediately think of any reason that
>> > HTML/JS/CSS
>> > > would make it impossible.  The answer regarding missing features
>> should
>> > > rarely be “no”.  We should try to educate people that Apache projects
>> are
>> > > volunteer-driven, that folks can directly pay volunteers to do work,
>> that
>> > > no corporation is investing in development of features like Adobe did,
>> > and
>> > > we generally implement the features that folks can find volunteers to
>> > > produce.
>> > >
>> > > And yes, event listeners are a workaround for now.
>> > >
>> > > My 2 cents,
>> > > -Alex
>> > >
>> > > From: Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>
>> > > Date: Sunday, April 26, 2020 at 10:17 AM
>> > > To: Apache Royale Development <de...@royale.apache.org>, Alex Harui <
>> > > aharui@adobe.com>
>> > > Subject: Re: Two way databinding question in SOF
>> > >
>> > > I think @Alex Harui<ma...@adobe.com> pointed out once that
>> one
>> > > can achieve data binding with event listeners.
>> > >
>> > > Our help docs page on data binding [1] is incomplete. I will try to
>> > finish
>> > > that soon, and will add a note saying explicitly that, at the moment,
>> > > two-way binding is not available without the workaround I mentioned.
>> > >
>> > > [1] https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/features/data-binding<
>> > >
>> >
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapache.github.io%2Froyale-docs%2Ffeatures%2Fdata-binding&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C49779b2d82ce45d3be0808d7ea05c229%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637235182765071097&sdata=UdOHR1S24%2BiUgSY9fqVAA9CmCWseaobIs4shb6g1VsY%3D&reserved=0
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > a
>> > >
>> > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:35 AM Carlos Rovira <
>> carlosrovira@apache.org
>> > > <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > someone can respond this new question on SOF [1]?
>> > >
>> > > I can't say nothing about it than "we don't support it", but maybe
>> others
>> > > can give some light about plans for two way data binding.
>> > >
>> > > [1]
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61409429/does-apache-royale-support-two-way-data-binding-now
>> > > <
>> > >
>> >
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fquestions%2F61409429%2Fdoes-apache-royale-support-two-way-data-binding-now&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C49779b2d82ce45d3be0808d7ea05c229%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637235182765081089&sdata=qmCTXbd38vGBq5NWfDdtJKa3Dawi1hGv4MJK%2BpWIqOM%3D&reserved=0
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Carlos Rovira
>> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira<
>> > >
>> >
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C49779b2d82ce45d3be0808d7ea05c229%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637235182765081089&sdata=6TrvNEdWXGez4lNhs2fzLfhAUibzJ9HaxVyTTUzLRoY%3D&reserved=0
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Andrew Wetmore
>> > >
>> > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/<
>> > >
>> >
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C49779b2d82ce45d3be0808d7ea05c229%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637235182765081089&sdata=0HYokw%2FBrv3%2FJ6fk0DHJXT5hNBA01nirUBzpQKkcNuE%3D&reserved=0
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Carlos Rovira
>> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>
>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Re: Two way databinding question in SOF

Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
Ok Piotr,

thanks for letting us know. Very useful.
Hope someday someone wants to make this more "flex" reducing the typing to
just "@" ;)


El lun., 27 abr. 2020 a las 14:22, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Hi Guys,
>
> Two way binding is possible using following notation in MXML
>
> <fx:Binding source="voObj.firstName" destination="myTextInput.text" />
> <fx:Binding source=" myTextInput .text" destination=" voObj .firstName" />
>
> It doesn't work always. There are some issues. I have reported them
> somewhere. I hope some day Greg will look into that.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> pon., 27 kwi 2020 o 10:45 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
> napisał(a):
>
> > Thanks Andrew and Alex,
> >
> > @Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>, can you please respond to Yu Taro
> > as
> > you do the doc changes?
> >
> > thanks in advance!
> >
> > El dom., 26 abr. 2020 a las 19:37, Alex Harui (<aharui@adobe.com.invalid
> >)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > IMO, the answer should be some variant of the usual “we need volunteers
> > to
> > > make it happen”.  I can’t immediately think of any reason that
> > HTML/JS/CSS
> > > would make it impossible.  The answer regarding missing features should
> > > rarely be “no”.  We should try to educate people that Apache projects
> are
> > > volunteer-driven, that folks can directly pay volunteers to do work,
> that
> > > no corporation is investing in development of features like Adobe did,
> > and
> > > we generally implement the features that folks can find volunteers to
> > > produce.
> > >
> > > And yes, event listeners are a workaround for now.
> > >
> > > My 2 cents,
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > From: Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>
> > > Date: Sunday, April 26, 2020 at 10:17 AM
> > > To: Apache Royale Development <de...@royale.apache.org>, Alex Harui <
> > > aharui@adobe.com>
> > > Subject: Re: Two way databinding question in SOF
> > >
> > > I think @Alex Harui<ma...@adobe.com> pointed out once that one
> > > can achieve data binding with event listeners.
> > >
> > > Our help docs page on data binding [1] is incomplete. I will try to
> > finish
> > > that soon, and will add a note saying explicitly that, at the moment,
> > > two-way binding is not available without the workaround I mentioned.
> > >
> > > [1] https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/features/data-binding<
> > >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapache.github.io%2Froyale-docs%2Ffeatures%2Fdata-binding&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C49779b2d82ce45d3be0808d7ea05c229%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637235182765071097&sdata=UdOHR1S24%2BiUgSY9fqVAA9CmCWseaobIs4shb6g1VsY%3D&reserved=0
> > > >
> > >
> > > a
> > >
> > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:35 AM Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrovira@apache.org
> > > <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > someone can respond this new question on SOF [1]?
> > >
> > > I can't say nothing about it than "we don't support it", but maybe
> others
> > > can give some light about plans for two way data binding.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61409429/does-apache-royale-support-two-way-data-binding-now
> > > <
> > >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fquestions%2F61409429%2Fdoes-apache-royale-support-two-way-data-binding-now&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C49779b2d82ce45d3be0808d7ea05c229%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637235182765081089&sdata=qmCTXbd38vGBq5NWfDdtJKa3Dawi1hGv4MJK%2BpWIqOM%3D&reserved=0
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira<
> > >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C49779b2d82ce45d3be0808d7ea05c229%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637235182765081089&sdata=6TrvNEdWXGez4lNhs2fzLfhAUibzJ9HaxVyTTUzLRoY%3D&reserved=0
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Andrew Wetmore
> > >
> > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/<
> > >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C49779b2d82ce45d3be0808d7ea05c229%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637235182765081089&sdata=0HYokw%2FBrv3%2FJ6fk0DHJXT5hNBA01nirUBzpQKkcNuE%3D&reserved=0
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Re: Two way databinding question in SOF

Posted by Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>.
Hi Guys,

Two way binding is possible using following notation in MXML

<fx:Binding source="voObj.firstName" destination="myTextInput.text" />
<fx:Binding source=" myTextInput .text" destination=" voObj .firstName" />

It doesn't work always. There are some issues. I have reported them
somewhere. I hope some day Greg will look into that.

Thanks,
Piotr

pon., 27 kwi 2020 o 10:45 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
napisał(a):

> Thanks Andrew and Alex,
>
> @Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>, can you please respond to Yu Taro
> as
> you do the doc changes?
>
> thanks in advance!
>
> El dom., 26 abr. 2020 a las 19:37, Alex Harui (<ah...@adobe.com.invalid>)
> escribió:
>
> > IMO, the answer should be some variant of the usual “we need volunteers
> to
> > make it happen”.  I can’t immediately think of any reason that
> HTML/JS/CSS
> > would make it impossible.  The answer regarding missing features should
> > rarely be “no”.  We should try to educate people that Apache projects are
> > volunteer-driven, that folks can directly pay volunteers to do work, that
> > no corporation is investing in development of features like Adobe did,
> and
> > we generally implement the features that folks can find volunteers to
> > produce.
> >
> > And yes, event listeners are a workaround for now.
> >
> > My 2 cents,
> > -Alex
> >
> > From: Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>
> > Date: Sunday, April 26, 2020 at 10:17 AM
> > To: Apache Royale Development <de...@royale.apache.org>, Alex Harui <
> > aharui@adobe.com>
> > Subject: Re: Two way databinding question in SOF
> >
> > I think @Alex Harui<ma...@adobe.com> pointed out once that one
> > can achieve data binding with event listeners.
> >
> > Our help docs page on data binding [1] is incomplete. I will try to
> finish
> > that soon, and will add a note saying explicitly that, at the moment,
> > two-way binding is not available without the workaround I mentioned.
> >
> > [1] https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/features/data-binding<
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapache.github.io%2Froyale-docs%2Ffeatures%2Fdata-binding&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C49779b2d82ce45d3be0808d7ea05c229%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637235182765071097&sdata=UdOHR1S24%2BiUgSY9fqVAA9CmCWseaobIs4shb6g1VsY%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> >
> > a
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:35 AM Carlos Rovira <carlosrovira@apache.org
> > <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > someone can respond this new question on SOF [1]?
> >
> > I can't say nothing about it than "we don't support it", but maybe others
> > can give some light about plans for two way data binding.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61409429/does-apache-royale-support-two-way-data-binding-now
> > <
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fquestions%2F61409429%2Fdoes-apache-royale-support-two-way-data-binding-now&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C49779b2d82ce45d3be0808d7ea05c229%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637235182765081089&sdata=qmCTXbd38vGBq5NWfDdtJKa3Dawi1hGv4MJK%2BpWIqOM%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira<
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C49779b2d82ce45d3be0808d7ea05c229%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637235182765081089&sdata=6TrvNEdWXGez4lNhs2fzLfhAUibzJ9HaxVyTTUzLRoY%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Wetmore
> >
> > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/<
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C49779b2d82ce45d3be0808d7ea05c229%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637235182765081089&sdata=0HYokw%2FBrv3%2FJ6fk0DHJXT5hNBA01nirUBzpQKkcNuE%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*

Re: Two way databinding question in SOF

Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
Thanks Andrew and Alex,

@Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>, can you please respond to Yu Taro as
you do the doc changes?

thanks in advance!

El dom., 26 abr. 2020 a las 19:37, Alex Harui (<ah...@adobe.com.invalid>)
escribió:

> IMO, the answer should be some variant of the usual “we need volunteers to
> make it happen”.  I can’t immediately think of any reason that HTML/JS/CSS
> would make it impossible.  The answer regarding missing features should
> rarely be “no”.  We should try to educate people that Apache projects are
> volunteer-driven, that folks can directly pay volunteers to do work, that
> no corporation is investing in development of features like Adobe did, and
> we generally implement the features that folks can find volunteers to
> produce.
>
> And yes, event listeners are a workaround for now.
>
> My 2 cents,
> -Alex
>
> From: Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>
> Date: Sunday, April 26, 2020 at 10:17 AM
> To: Apache Royale Development <de...@royale.apache.org>, Alex Harui <
> aharui@adobe.com>
> Subject: Re: Two way databinding question in SOF
>
> I think @Alex Harui<ma...@adobe.com> pointed out once that one
> can achieve data binding with event listeners.
>
> Our help docs page on data binding [1] is incomplete. I will try to finish
> that soon, and will add a note saying explicitly that, at the moment,
> two-way binding is not available without the workaround I mentioned.
>
> [1] https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/features/data-binding<
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapache.github.io%2Froyale-docs%2Ffeatures%2Fdata-binding&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C49779b2d82ce45d3be0808d7ea05c229%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637235182765071097&sdata=UdOHR1S24%2BiUgSY9fqVAA9CmCWseaobIs4shb6g1VsY%3D&reserved=0
> >
>
> a
>
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:35 AM Carlos Rovira <carlosrovira@apache.org
> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> someone can respond this new question on SOF [1]?
>
> I can't say nothing about it than "we don't support it", but maybe others
> can give some light about plans for two way data binding.
>
> [1]
>
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61409429/does-apache-royale-support-two-way-data-binding-now
> <
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fquestions%2F61409429%2Fdoes-apache-royale-support-two-way-data-binding-now&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C49779b2d82ce45d3be0808d7ea05c229%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637235182765081089&sdata=qmCTXbd38vGBq5NWfDdtJKa3Dawi1hGv4MJK%2BpWIqOM%3D&reserved=0
> >
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira<
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C49779b2d82ce45d3be0808d7ea05c229%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637235182765081089&sdata=6TrvNEdWXGez4lNhs2fzLfhAUibzJ9HaxVyTTUzLRoY%3D&reserved=0
> >
>
>
> --
> Andrew Wetmore
>
> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/<
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C49779b2d82ce45d3be0808d7ea05c229%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637235182765081089&sdata=0HYokw%2FBrv3%2FJ6fk0DHJXT5hNBA01nirUBzpQKkcNuE%3D&reserved=0
> >
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Re: Two way databinding question in SOF

Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
IMO, the answer should be some variant of the usual “we need volunteers to make it happen”.  I can’t immediately think of any reason that HTML/JS/CSS would make it impossible.  The answer regarding missing features should rarely be “no”.  We should try to educate people that Apache projects are volunteer-driven, that folks can directly pay volunteers to do work, that no corporation is investing in development of features like Adobe did, and we generally implement the features that folks can find volunteers to produce.

And yes, event listeners are a workaround for now.

My 2 cents,
-Alex

From: Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>
Date: Sunday, April 26, 2020 at 10:17 AM
To: Apache Royale Development <de...@royale.apache.org>, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
Subject: Re: Two way databinding question in SOF

I think @Alex Harui<ma...@adobe.com> pointed out once that one can achieve data binding with event listeners.

Our help docs page on data binding [1] is incomplete. I will try to finish that soon, and will add a note saying explicitly that, at the moment, two-way binding is not available without the workaround I mentioned.

[1] https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/features/data-binding<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapache.github.io%2Froyale-docs%2Ffeatures%2Fdata-binding&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C49779b2d82ce45d3be0808d7ea05c229%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637235182765071097&sdata=UdOHR1S24%2BiUgSY9fqVAA9CmCWseaobIs4shb6g1VsY%3D&reserved=0>

a

On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:35 AM Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>> wrote:
Hi,

someone can respond this new question on SOF [1]?

I can't say nothing about it than "we don't support it", but maybe others
can give some light about plans for two way data binding.

[1]
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61409429/does-apache-royale-support-two-way-data-binding-now<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fquestions%2F61409429%2Fdoes-apache-royale-support-two-way-data-binding-now&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C49779b2d82ce45d3be0808d7ea05c229%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637235182765081089&sdata=qmCTXbd38vGBq5NWfDdtJKa3Dawi1hGv4MJK%2BpWIqOM%3D&reserved=0>

--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C49779b2d82ce45d3be0808d7ea05c229%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637235182765081089&sdata=6TrvNEdWXGez4lNhs2fzLfhAUibzJ9HaxVyTTUzLRoY%3D&reserved=0>


--
Andrew Wetmore

http://cottage14.blogspot.com/<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C49779b2d82ce45d3be0808d7ea05c229%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637235182765081089&sdata=0HYokw%2FBrv3%2FJ6fk0DHJXT5hNBA01nirUBzpQKkcNuE%3D&reserved=0>

Re: Two way databinding question in SOF

Posted by Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>.
I think @Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> pointed out once that one can
achieve data binding with event listeners.

Our help docs page on data binding [1] is incomplete. I will try to finish
that soon, and will add a note saying explicitly that, at the moment,
two-way binding is not available without the workaround I mentioned.

[1] https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/features/data-binding

a

On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:35 AM Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> someone can respond this new question on SOF [1]?
>
> I can't say nothing about it than "we don't support it", but maybe others
> can give some light about plans for two way data binding.
>
> [1]
>
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61409429/does-apache-royale-support-two-way-data-binding-now
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>


-- 
Andrew Wetmore

http://cottage14.blogspot.com/