You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org by Daniel Maher <ma...@yahoo.com> on 2003/06/29 14:27:22 UTC
Why no .fo needed to run fop?
Hi all,
I have a simple conceptual question...why are you able to run fop with just an XSL stylesheet and the input XML doc?
1. Is an fo created implicitly?
2. what's the format of this fo?
>From the examples:
fop -xsl foo.xsl -xml foo.xml -pdf foo.pdf
Thanks,
Dan Maher
-Dan
I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize.
http://www.northernfern.com/Anna/
NEW! http://www.freeroller.net/page/toastchee/Weblog
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
RE: Why no .fo needed to run fop?
Posted by Victor Mote <vi...@outfitr.com>.
Daniel Maher wrote:
<-- Start -->
Uh, thanks. My question, however, is why you can run fop without an fo, and
in that case, what 'do it do'?
<-- End -->
The following page will give you some insight:
http://xml.apache.org/fop/running.html#check-input
Also, please note requirements for email messages (specifically using text
instead of html):
http://xml.apache.org/fop/maillist.html
Victor Mote
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-user-help@xml.apache.org
RE: Why no .fo needed to run fop?
Posted by Andreas Delmelle <a_...@pandora.be>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
it is not... an intermediate .fo is indeed generated ( if the .xsl &
.xml together
make up a well-formed xsl:fo document ).
greetz
ald
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Maher [mailto:maher_dan2@yahoo.com]
Sent: zondag 29 juni 2003 20:34
To: fop-user@xml.apache.org
Subject: RE: Why no .fo needed to run fop?
Uh, thanks. My question, however, is why you can run fop without an
fo, and in that case, what 'do it do'?
Bonnie Yelverton <b....@verizon.net> wrote:
Hi Dan,
Please, read a little more on the FOP site.
You use XSLT with XML to create a .fo file, in the same way you
use it to crate an xml file. Then that file is converted to pdf with
wop. Quite simple.
Bonnie
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Maher [mailto:maher_dan2@yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 5:27 AM
To: fop-user@xml.apache.org
Subject: Why no .fo needed to run fop?
Hi all,
I have a simple conceptual question...why are you able to run fop
with just an XSL stylesheet and the input XML doc?
1. Is an fo created implicitly?
2. what's the format of this fo?
From the examples:
fop -xsl foo.xsl -xml foo.xml -pdf foo.pdf
Thanks,
Dan Maher
-Dan
I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize.
http://www.northernfern.com/Anna/
NEW! http://www.freeroller.net/page/toastchee/Weblog
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- ------
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
-Dan
I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize.
http://www.northernfern.com/Anna/
NEW! http://www.freeroller.net/page/toastchee/Weblog
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBPv9YWdBw/OvTa+XUEQKwPwCfTxoTQlwt7TcgfkUW5kQnJ9PSQucAoNf9
6WOsPnI7NLwQSPR+jc5GaHed
=+1k+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
RE: Why no .fo needed to run fop?
Posted by Daniel Maher <ma...@yahoo.com>.
Uh, thanks. My question, however, is why you can run fop without an fo, and in that case, what 'do it do'?
Bonnie Yelverton <b....@verizon.net> wrote:
Hi Dan,
Please, read a little more on the FOP site.
You use XSLT with XML to create a .fo file, in the same way you use it to crate an xml file. Then that file is converted to pdf with wop. Quite simple.
Bonnie
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Maher [mailto:maher_dan2@yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 5:27 AM
To: fop-user@xml.apache.org
Subject: Why no .fo needed to run fop?
Hi all,
I have a simple conceptual question...why are you able to run fop with just an XSL stylesheet and the input XML doc?
1. Is an fo created implicitly?
2. what's the format of this fo?
>From the examples:
fop -xsl foo.xsl -xml foo.xml -pdf foo.pdf
Thanks,
Dan Maher
-Dan
I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize.
http://www.northernfern.com/Anna/
NEW! http://www.freeroller.net/page/toastchee/Weblog
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
-Dan
I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize.
http://www.northernfern.com/Anna/
NEW! http://www.freeroller.net/page/toastchee/Weblog
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
RE: Why no .fo needed to run fop?
Posted by Bonnie Yelverton <b....@verizon.net>.
Hi Dan,
Please, read a little more on the FOP site.
You use XSLT with XML to create a .fo file, in the same way you use it to
crate an xml file. Then that file is converted to pdf with wop. Quite
simple.
Bonnie
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Maher [mailto:maher_dan2@yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 5:27 AM
To: fop-user@xml.apache.org
Subject: Why no .fo needed to run fop?
Hi all,
I have a simple conceptual question...why are you able to run fop with just
an XSL stylesheet and the input XML doc?
1. Is an fo created implicitly?
2. what's the format of this fo?
>From the examples:
fop -xsl foo.xsl -xml foo.xml -pdf foo.pdf
Thanks,
Dan Maher
-Dan
I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize.
<http://www.northernfern.com/Anna/> http://www.northernfern.com/Anna/
NEW! <http://www.freeroller.net/page/toastchee/Weblog>
http://www.freeroller.net/page/toastchee/Weblog
<http://toastchee.crimsonblog.com/>
<http://www.livejournal.com/users/toastchee/>
_____
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC
<http://pa.yahoo.com/*http:/rd.yahoo.com/evt=1207/*http:/promo.yahoo.com/sbc
/> Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!