You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@manifoldcf.apache.org by Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com> on 2010/10/04 01:35:45 UTC
[RESULT][VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
The vote passes. Barely. Total count +1. Although I believe we
didn't hear from lots of folks that made ManifoldCF their #1 choice
last time.
So, our new name is ManifoldCF. I'm thinking this will translate to:
org.apache.mcf
MCFException
MCF abbreviation
ManifoldCF full name
webapps mcf-crawler-ui, mcf-authority-service, mcf-api-service
... and I can begin to change the tree around probably by tomorrow
morning. Sound okay to everyone?
Karl
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
Posted by Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com>.
I think we still can use abbreviations, sparingly, where there is
unlikely to be a collision and where the added length is a detriment.
For example:
environment variable MCF_HOME
jar prefix, e.g mcf-core.jar
webapp name, e.g. mcf-crawler-ui.war
I just didn't want there to be an issue with either the documentation
or, especially, the source tree, again.
Long form permissibility is still open, but I'm just sticking with
ManifoldCF as the only project name/handle, for now.
Karl
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 12:48 AM, Jack Krupansky
<ja...@lucidimagination.com> wrote:
> That sounds good, and it is great to finally see the project naming move
> towards a final form that can stand up to even the most rigorous challenge.
> Long live ManifoldCF!
>
> That said, we may still choose to informally refer to MCF or mcf, although
> we should of course promote the proper name, either as ManifoldCF or Apache
> ManifoldCF (or Apache Manifold Connectors Framework?), as often and widely
> as possible.
>
> Did we ever settle whether that long-form name with CF expanded was okay for
> descriptive purposes even if the official Apache project name is "Apache
> ManifoldCF"?
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Karl Wright" <da...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 9:56 AM
> To: <co...@incubator.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
>
>> On reflection, I've actually decided to just use manifoldcf
>> everywhere, just because that's least likely to run into problems in
>> the long run.
>> Karl
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think using mcf in the package name and the names of the webapps
>>> will likely be fine. I'm less worried about everything else. Grant,
>>> any comments?
>>>
>>> Karl
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 8:58 PM, Jack Krupansky
>>> <ja...@lucidimagination.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm okay with all of that, but with a question whether we can get away
>>>> with
>>>> using an abbreviation in "org.apache.mcf" as opposed to
>>>> "org.apache.manifoldcf". And then, whether the graduated project would
>>>> be at
>>>> "http://mcf.apache.org" or "http://manifoldcf.apache.org". I have no
>>>> idea
>>>> whether there might be pushback higher up on that, but my inclination is
>>>> to
>>>> go ahead with using mcf. I'll defer to Karl as to whether he wants to
>>>> verify
>>>> our assumption through/with Grant/et al or just go ahead.
>>>>
>>>> -- Jack Krupansky
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>>> From: "Karl Wright" <da...@gmail.com>
>>>> Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 7:35 PM
>>>> To: "connectors-dev" <co...@incubator.apache.org>
>>>> Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
>>>>
>>>>> The vote passes. Barely. Total count +1. Although I believe we
>>>>> didn't hear from lots of folks that made ManifoldCF their #1 choice
>>>>> last time.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, our new name is ManifoldCF. I'm thinking this will translate to:
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.mcf
>>>>> MCFException
>>>>> MCF abbreviation
>>>>> ManifoldCF full name
>>>>> webapps mcf-crawler-ui, mcf-authority-service, mcf-api-service
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ... and I can begin to change the tree around probably by tomorrow
>>>>> morning. Sound okay to everyone?
>>>>>
>>>>> Karl
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
Posted by Jack Krupansky <ja...@lucidimagination.com>.
That sounds good, and it is great to finally see the project naming move
towards a final form that can stand up to even the most rigorous challenge.
Long live ManifoldCF!
That said, we may still choose to informally refer to MCF or mcf, although
we should of course promote the proper name, either as ManifoldCF or Apache
ManifoldCF (or Apache Manifold Connectors Framework?), as often and widely
as possible.
Did we ever settle whether that long-form name with CF expanded was okay for
descriptive purposes even if the official Apache project name is "Apache
ManifoldCF"?
-- Jack Krupansky
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Karl Wright" <da...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 9:56 AM
To: <co...@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
> On reflection, I've actually decided to just use manifoldcf
> everywhere, just because that's least likely to run into problems in
> the long run.
> Karl
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think using mcf in the package name and the names of the webapps
>> will likely be fine. I'm less worried about everything else. Grant,
>> any comments?
>>
>> Karl
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 8:58 PM, Jack Krupansky
>> <ja...@lucidimagination.com> wrote:
>>> I'm okay with all of that, but with a question whether we can get away
>>> with
>>> using an abbreviation in "org.apache.mcf" as opposed to
>>> "org.apache.manifoldcf". And then, whether the graduated project would
>>> be at
>>> "http://mcf.apache.org" or "http://manifoldcf.apache.org". I have no
>>> idea
>>> whether there might be pushback higher up on that, but my inclination is
>>> to
>>> go ahead with using mcf. I'll defer to Karl as to whether he wants to
>>> verify
>>> our assumption through/with Grant/et al or just go ahead.
>>>
>>> -- Jack Krupansky
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>> From: "Karl Wright" <da...@gmail.com>
>>> Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 7:35 PM
>>> To: "connectors-dev" <co...@incubator.apache.org>
>>> Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
>>>
>>>> The vote passes. Barely. Total count +1. Although I believe we
>>>> didn't hear from lots of folks that made ManifoldCF their #1 choice
>>>> last time.
>>>>
>>>> So, our new name is ManifoldCF. I'm thinking this will translate to:
>>>>
>>>> org.apache.mcf
>>>> MCFException
>>>> MCF abbreviation
>>>> ManifoldCF full name
>>>> webapps mcf-crawler-ui, mcf-authority-service, mcf-api-service
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ... and I can begin to change the tree around probably by tomorrow
>>>> morning. Sound okay to everyone?
>>>>
>>>> Karl
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
Posted by Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com>.
On reflection, I've actually decided to just use manifoldcf
everywhere, just because that's least likely to run into problems in
the long run.
Karl
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think using mcf in the package name and the names of the webapps
> will likely be fine. I'm less worried about everything else. Grant,
> any comments?
>
> Karl
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 8:58 PM, Jack Krupansky
> <ja...@lucidimagination.com> wrote:
>> I'm okay with all of that, but with a question whether we can get away with
>> using an abbreviation in "org.apache.mcf" as opposed to
>> "org.apache.manifoldcf". And then, whether the graduated project would be at
>> "http://mcf.apache.org" or "http://manifoldcf.apache.org". I have no idea
>> whether there might be pushback higher up on that, but my inclination is to
>> go ahead with using mcf. I'll defer to Karl as to whether he wants to verify
>> our assumption through/with Grant/et al or just go ahead.
>>
>> -- Jack Krupansky
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "Karl Wright" <da...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 7:35 PM
>> To: "connectors-dev" <co...@incubator.apache.org>
>> Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
>>
>>> The vote passes. Barely. Total count +1. Although I believe we
>>> didn't hear from lots of folks that made ManifoldCF their #1 choice
>>> last time.
>>>
>>> So, our new name is ManifoldCF. I'm thinking this will translate to:
>>>
>>> org.apache.mcf
>>> MCFException
>>> MCF abbreviation
>>> ManifoldCF full name
>>> webapps mcf-crawler-ui, mcf-authority-service, mcf-api-service
>>>
>>>
>>> ... and I can begin to change the tree around probably by tomorrow
>>> morning. Sound okay to everyone?
>>>
>>> Karl
>>
>>
>
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
Posted by Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com>.
I think using mcf in the package name and the names of the webapps
will likely be fine. I'm less worried about everything else. Grant,
any comments?
Karl
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 8:58 PM, Jack Krupansky
<ja...@lucidimagination.com> wrote:
> I'm okay with all of that, but with a question whether we can get away with
> using an abbreviation in "org.apache.mcf" as opposed to
> "org.apache.manifoldcf". And then, whether the graduated project would be at
> "http://mcf.apache.org" or "http://manifoldcf.apache.org". I have no idea
> whether there might be pushback higher up on that, but my inclination is to
> go ahead with using mcf. I'll defer to Karl as to whether he wants to verify
> our assumption through/with Grant/et al or just go ahead.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Karl Wright" <da...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 7:35 PM
> To: "connectors-dev" <co...@incubator.apache.org>
> Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
>
>> The vote passes. Barely. Total count +1. Although I believe we
>> didn't hear from lots of folks that made ManifoldCF their #1 choice
>> last time.
>>
>> So, our new name is ManifoldCF. I'm thinking this will translate to:
>>
>> org.apache.mcf
>> MCFException
>> MCF abbreviation
>> ManifoldCF full name
>> webapps mcf-crawler-ui, mcf-authority-service, mcf-api-service
>>
>>
>> ... and I can begin to change the tree around probably by tomorrow
>> morning. Sound okay to everyone?
>>
>> Karl
>
>
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
Posted by Jack Krupansky <ja...@lucidimagination.com>.
I'm okay with all of that, but with a question whether we can get away with
using an abbreviation in "org.apache.mcf" as opposed to
"org.apache.manifoldcf". And then, whether the graduated project would be at
"http://mcf.apache.org" or "http://manifoldcf.apache.org". I have no idea
whether there might be pushback higher up on that, but my inclination is to
go ahead with using mcf. I'll defer to Karl as to whether he wants to verify
our assumption through/with Grant/et al or just go ahead.
-- Jack Krupansky
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Karl Wright" <da...@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 7:35 PM
To: "connectors-dev" <co...@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
> The vote passes. Barely. Total count +1. Although I believe we
> didn't hear from lots of folks that made ManifoldCF their #1 choice
> last time.
>
> So, our new name is ManifoldCF. I'm thinking this will translate to:
>
> org.apache.mcf
> MCFException
> MCF abbreviation
> ManifoldCF full name
> webapps mcf-crawler-ui, mcf-authority-service, mcf-api-service
>
>
> ... and I can begin to change the tree around probably by tomorrow
> morning. Sound okay to everyone?
>
> Karl