Message Persistance Question

[jmychasiw <jm...@gmail.com>]

Greetings:
    We are currently evaluating ActiveMq 5.x

    We are trying to decide between AMQMessageStore and jdbc persistence to
Oracle. The documentation seems to advocate for AMQMessageStore over jdbc.
Our project requires that massages cannot be lost.

What are reasons that I would pick one over the other?

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks.
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Message-Persistance-Question-tp19803553p19803553.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Message Persistance Question

[Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 11:49 AM, jmychasiw <jm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Greetings:
>    We are currently evaluating ActiveMq 5.x
>
>    We are trying to decide between AMQMessageStore and jdbc persistence to
> Oracle. The documentation seems to advocate for AMQMessageStore over jdbc.
> Our project requires that massages cannot be lost.
>
> What are reasons that I would pick one over the other?

The reason for this is that persistence to JDBC can be very slow,
especially when compared to the AMQ Message Store.

Bruce
-- 
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'

Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
Apache Camel - http://activemq.org/camel/
Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/

Blog: http://bruceblog.org/