You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by Myrna van Lunteren <m....@gmail.com> on 2006/04/12 05:37:00 UTC

build broken?

Hi,

I think the build may be broken. My nightly cts-like tests all failed, as
does our insane jar nightly with jdk15:
> java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.derby.jdbc.EmbeddedDriver

revision is 393361.
The only build errors I saw reported seem related to the *40 classes, I
thought those got built only if you *have* jdk16...

Does anyone else see this?

Myrna

Re: build broken?

Posted by "V.Narayanan" <V....@Sun.COM>.
Hi Myrna,
There was an email Rick sent regarding upgrading mustang to greater than 
b78 can you please check if your mustang version is greater than b78.
THis is because the signature of the wrapper methods have changed recently
thanx
Narayanan

Myrna van Lunteren wrote On 04/12/06 09:07,:

> Hi,
>  
> I think the build may be broken. My nightly cts-like tests all failed, 
> as does our insane jar nightly with jdk15:
> > java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.derby.jdbc.EmbeddedDriver
>  
> revision is 393361.
> The only build errors I saw reported seem related to the *40 classes, 
> I thought those got built only if you *have* jdk16...
>  
> Does anyone else see this?
>  
> Myrna


Re: build broken?

Posted by "V.Narayanan" <V....@Sun.COM>.
Hi Myrna,

Apologies for the duplicate email but I did a

svn update
ant clobber
ant all
on a new workspace "At revision 393374"

it went through without build errors for me

thanx
Narayanan


Myrna van Lunteren wrote On 04/12/06 09:07,:

> Hi,
>  
> I think the build may be broken. My nightly cts-like tests all failed, 
> as does our insane jar nightly with jdk15:
> > java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.derby.jdbc.EmbeddedDriver
>  
> revision is 393361.
> The only build errors I saw reported seem related to the *40 classes, 
> I thought those got built only if you *have* jdk16...
>  
> Does anyone else see this?
>  
> Myrna


Re: build broken?

Posted by Andrew McIntyre <mc...@gmail.com>.
On 4/12/06, Rick Hillegas <Ri...@sun.com> wrote:
>
> I thought that the mustang builds were generally available at
> http://download.java.net/jdk6/binaries/. Does this download site not
> work for you?

Nope. Legal obligations between my employer (IBM) and Sun require that
I obtain all JDK builds from Sun through our internal JVM group. So I
can't get the latest until they say so. :-)

andrew

Re: build broken?

Posted by Rick Hillegas <Ri...@Sun.COM>.
Hi Andrew,

I thought that the mustang builds were generally available at 
http://download.java.net/jdk6/binaries/. Does this download site not 
work for you?

Regards,
-Rick

Andrew McIntyre wrote:

>On 4/11/06, Myrna van Lunteren <m....@gmail.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>I think the build may be broken. My nightly cts-like tests all failed, as
>>does our insane jar nightly with jdk15:
>>    
>>
>>>java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
>>>      
>>>
>>org.apache.derby.jdbc.EmbeddedDriver
>>
>>revision is 393361.
>>The only build errors I saw reported seem related to the *40 classes, I
>>thought those got built only if you *have* jdk16...
>>    
>>
>
>Our nightly builds do build with JDK 1.6, but we don't have access to
>b78, the latest we have access to is b77. I've removed jdk16 from our
>builds until we have access to the latest.
>
>andrew
>  
>


Re: build broken?

Posted by Andrew McIntyre <mc...@gmail.com>.
On 4/11/06, Myrna van Lunteren <m....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think the build may be broken. My nightly cts-like tests all failed, as
> does our insane jar nightly with jdk15:
> > java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> org.apache.derby.jdbc.EmbeddedDriver
>
> revision is 393361.
> The only build errors I saw reported seem related to the *40 classes, I
> thought those got built only if you *have* jdk16...

Our nightly builds do build with JDK 1.6, but we don't have access to
b78, the latest we have access to is b77. I've removed jdk16 from our
builds until we have access to the latest.

andrew