You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@wicket.apache.org by Jim Pinkham <pi...@gmail.com> on 2011/04/01 19:56:04 UTC
[Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering
I've had a hard time lately trying to get corporate acceptance of the Wicket
framework.
In fact, our company looked at this comparison of java frameworks:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_application_frameworks
*Project* *Current Stable Version* Apache Click 2.2.0 Apache Cocoon
2.2.0 Apache Struts 2.2.1.1 Apache Tapestry 5.2.4 Apache Wicket
1.4.15 AppFuse 2.0.2 Aranea 1.0.10 Eclipse RAP 1.2.0 FormEngine
1.7.1 Google Web Toolkit 2.2.0 Hamlets 1.6 IceFaces 2 ItsNat
1 JavaServer
Faces 2 JBoss Seam 2.2.0 GA Jspx-bay 1.1.0 JVx WebUI 0.8 ManyDesigns
Portofino 3.1.10 OpenLaszlo 4.1 OpenXava 4.0.1 Oracle ADF 11.1.1.4
Play 1.1.1 RIFE 1.6.2 Shale 1.0.4 Sling 5 SmartClient 8 Spring
3.0.5 Stripes 1.5.4 Telosys 1.1.1 ThinWire 1.2 Vaadin(IT Mill
Toolkit) 6.5.1 Wavemaker 6.1.10 WebObjects 5.4.3 WebWork 2.2.6
ZK 5.0.5 ztemplates 0.9.9.6
The powers that be decided to pick Smart Client over Apache Wicket because
they have the highest version number.
So, I think the time is right to move straight to the front of the pack and
release version 10.0.
Who's with me?
-- Jim
Spinal Tap Industries, Inc.
Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering
Posted by nino martinez wael <ni...@gmail.com>.
hah some of our servers are 2008 r2 :)
However im considering doing a nix distribution called "HAL 9000" as
it probably will attract a lot of users based on the high number...
2011/4/1 Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>:
> im running win 2000, you guys are too far behind.
>
> -igor
>
>
> 2011/4/1 Rafał Krupiński <r....@gmail.com>:
>> W dniu 01.04.2011 20:14, nino martinez wael pisze:
>>>
>>> Gotta be a aprils fools thing..
>>>
>>> Who would decide what framework to be used based on version number?
>>> Why not take a look at architecture instead... Ooh lets chose windows
>>> 95 instead of windows 7, it has a higher number so it gotta be better
>>
>> You have a valid point there, it's time to switch back to Win95
>>
>> Rafał Krupiński
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering
Posted by Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>.
im running win 2000, you guys are too far behind.
-igor
2011/4/1 Rafał Krupiński <r....@gmail.com>:
> W dniu 01.04.2011 20:14, nino martinez wael pisze:
>>
>> Gotta be a aprils fools thing..
>>
>> Who would decide what framework to be used based on version number?
>> Why not take a look at architecture instead... Ooh lets chose windows
>> 95 instead of windows 7, it has a higher number so it gotta be better
>
> You have a valid point there, it's time to switch back to Win95
>
> Rafał Krupiński
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering
Posted by Rafał Krupiński <r....@gmail.com>.
W dniu 01.04.2011 20:14, nino martinez wael pisze:
> Gotta be a aprils fools thing..
>
> Who would decide what framework to be used based on version number?
> Why not take a look at architecture instead... Ooh lets chose windows
> 95 instead of windows 7, it has a higher number so it gotta be better
You have a valid point there, it's time to switch back to Win95
Rafał Krupiński
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering
Posted by Peter Ertl <pe...@gmx.org>.
I just released "Hello, World!" v999999999999999999999.0 for the ultimate price of just $500. Who is interested?
Am 02.04.2011 um 03:11 schrieb Bruno Borges:
> Of course it is the best. It has no software error-prone... :-)
>
> No GC problems, no heap calculations.
>
> =)
>
> Bruno Borges
> www.brunoborges.com.br
> +55 21 76727099
>
> "The glory of great men should always be
> measured by the means they have used to
> acquire it."
> - Francois de La Rochefoucauld
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Chris Colman
> <ch...@stepaheadsoftware.com>wrote:
>
>> I poon you all with my Atari 7800!
>>
>> Ok, so it doesn't have a keyboard, let alone a JVM, but the version
>> number is so much bigger - it just has to be the best!
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: msj121 [mailto:msj242@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 8:56 AM
>>> To: users@wicket.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering
>>>
>>> I mean XP is letters... That is pretty amazing, there isn't even a
>> number,
>>> and even roman numerals, is there a 'P' in roman numerals?
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context: http://apache-
>>> wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Vote-New-Wicket-Version-Numbering-
>>> tp3420887p3421249.html
>>> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering
Posted by Bruno Borges <br...@gmail.com>.
Of course it is the best. It has no software error-prone... :-)
No GC problems, no heap calculations.
=)
Bruno Borges
www.brunoborges.com.br
+55 21 76727099
"The glory of great men should always be
measured by the means they have used to
acquire it."
- Francois de La Rochefoucauld
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Chris Colman
<ch...@stepaheadsoftware.com>wrote:
> I poon you all with my Atari 7800!
>
> Ok, so it doesn't have a keyboard, let alone a JVM, but the version
> number is so much bigger - it just has to be the best!
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: msj121 [mailto:msj242@gmail.com]
> >Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 8:56 AM
> >To: users@wicket.apache.org
> >Subject: Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering
> >
> >I mean XP is letters... That is pretty amazing, there isn't even a
> number,
> >and even roman numerals, is there a 'P' in roman numerals?
> >
> >--
> >View this message in context: http://apache-
> >wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Vote-New-Wicket-Version-Numbering-
> >tp3420887p3421249.html
> >Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
RE: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering
Posted by Chris Colman <ch...@stepaheadsoftware.com>.
I poon you all with my Atari 7800!
Ok, so it doesn't have a keyboard, let alone a JVM, but the version
number is so much bigger - it just has to be the best!
>-----Original Message-----
>From: msj121 [mailto:msj242@gmail.com]
>Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 8:56 AM
>To: users@wicket.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering
>
>I mean XP is letters... That is pretty amazing, there isn't even a
number,
>and even roman numerals, is there a 'P' in roman numerals?
>
>--
>View this message in context: http://apache-
>wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Vote-New-Wicket-Version-Numbering-
>tp3420887p3421249.html
>Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering
Posted by msj121 <ms...@gmail.com>.
I mean XP is letters... That is pretty amazing, there isn't even a number,
and even roman numerals, is there a 'P' in roman numerals?
--
View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Vote-New-Wicket-Version-Numbering-tp3420887p3421249.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering
Posted by Korbinian Bachl - whiskyworld <ko...@whiskyworld.de>.
OMG?!? ARE YOU SERIOUS??? Here we are already using WINDOWS 2000 with
OFFICE 2010 ;)
(Note: never ever believe any mails, blogs, newspapers on april 1st *g*)
Am 01.04.11 20:14, schrieb nino martinez wael:
> Gotta be a aprils fools thing..
>
> Who would decide what framework to be used based on version number?
> Why not take a look at architecture instead... Ooh lets chose windows
> 95 instead of windows 7, it has a higher number so it gotta be better
> .
>
> 2011/4/1 Igor Vaynberg<ig...@gmail.com>:
>> where do i apply for a job there? sounds like fun!
>>
>> -igor
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Jim Pinkham<pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I've had a hard time lately trying to get corporate acceptance of the Wicket
>>> framework.
>>>
>>> In fact, our company looked at this comparison of java frameworks:
>>>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_application_frameworks
>>>
>>> *Project* *Current Stable Version* Apache Click 2.2.0 Apache Cocoon
>>> 2.2.0 Apache Struts 2.2.1.1 Apache Tapestry 5.2.4 Apache Wicket
>>> 1.4.15 AppFuse 2.0.2 Aranea 1.0.10 Eclipse RAP 1.2.0 FormEngine
>>> 1.7.1 Google Web Toolkit 2.2.0 Hamlets 1.6 IceFaces 2 ItsNat
>>> 1 JavaServer
>>> Faces 2 JBoss Seam 2.2.0 GA Jspx-bay 1.1.0 JVx WebUI 0.8 ManyDesigns
>>> Portofino 3.1.10 OpenLaszlo 4.1 OpenXava 4.0.1 Oracle ADF 11.1.1.4
>>> Play 1.1.1 RIFE 1.6.2 Shale 1.0.4 Sling 5 SmartClient 8 Spring
>>> 3.0.5 Stripes 1.5.4 Telosys 1.1.1 ThinWire 1.2 Vaadin(IT Mill
>>> Toolkit) 6.5.1 Wavemaker 6.1.10 WebObjects 5.4.3 WebWork 2.2.6
>>> ZK 5.0.5 ztemplates 0.9.9.6
>>>
>>> The powers that be decided to pick Smart Client over Apache Wicket because
>>> they have the highest version number.
>>>
>>> So, I think the time is right to move straight to the front of the pack and
>>> release version 10.0.
>>>
>>> Who's with me?
>>>
>>> -- Jim
>>>
>>> Spinal Tap Industries, Inc.
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
--
____________________________________
whiskyworld e.K.
http://www.whiskyworld.de
Ziegelfeld 6
94481 Grafenau/ Haus im Wald
Tel. 08555/ 406 320
Fax. 08555/ 406 319
Amtsgericht Passau: HRA 11760
Geschäftsführer: Ulrike Bachl
UstID: DE260619452
________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering
Posted by nino martinez wael <ni...@gmail.com>.
Gotta be a aprils fools thing..
Who would decide what framework to be used based on version number?
Why not take a look at architecture instead... Ooh lets chose windows
95 instead of windows 7, it has a higher number so it gotta be better
.
2011/4/1 Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>:
> where do i apply for a job there? sounds like fun!
>
> -igor
>
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Jim Pinkham <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've had a hard time lately trying to get corporate acceptance of the Wicket
>> framework.
>>
>> In fact, our company looked at this comparison of java frameworks:
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_application_frameworks
>>
>> *Project* *Current Stable Version* Apache Click 2.2.0 Apache Cocoon
>> 2.2.0 Apache Struts 2.2.1.1 Apache Tapestry 5.2.4 Apache Wicket
>> 1.4.15 AppFuse 2.0.2 Aranea 1.0.10 Eclipse RAP 1.2.0 FormEngine
>> 1.7.1 Google Web Toolkit 2.2.0 Hamlets 1.6 IceFaces 2 ItsNat
>> 1 JavaServer
>> Faces 2 JBoss Seam 2.2.0 GA Jspx-bay 1.1.0 JVx WebUI 0.8 ManyDesigns
>> Portofino 3.1.10 OpenLaszlo 4.1 OpenXava 4.0.1 Oracle ADF 11.1.1.4
>> Play 1.1.1 RIFE 1.6.2 Shale 1.0.4 Sling 5 SmartClient 8 Spring
>> 3.0.5 Stripes 1.5.4 Telosys 1.1.1 ThinWire 1.2 Vaadin(IT Mill
>> Toolkit) 6.5.1 Wavemaker 6.1.10 WebObjects 5.4.3 WebWork 2.2.6
>> ZK 5.0.5 ztemplates 0.9.9.6
>>
>> The powers that be decided to pick Smart Client over Apache Wicket because
>> they have the highest version number.
>>
>> So, I think the time is right to move straight to the front of the pack and
>> release version 10.0.
>>
>> Who's with me?
>>
>> -- Jim
>>
>> Spinal Tap Industries, Inc.
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering
Posted by Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>.
where do i apply for a job there? sounds like fun!
-igor
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Jim Pinkham <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've had a hard time lately trying to get corporate acceptance of the Wicket
> framework.
>
> In fact, our company looked at this comparison of java frameworks:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_application_frameworks
>
> *Project* *Current Stable Version* Apache Click 2.2.0 Apache Cocoon
> 2.2.0 Apache Struts 2.2.1.1 Apache Tapestry 5.2.4 Apache Wicket
> 1.4.15 AppFuse 2.0.2 Aranea 1.0.10 Eclipse RAP 1.2.0 FormEngine
> 1.7.1 Google Web Toolkit 2.2.0 Hamlets 1.6 IceFaces 2 ItsNat
> 1 JavaServer
> Faces 2 JBoss Seam 2.2.0 GA Jspx-bay 1.1.0 JVx WebUI 0.8 ManyDesigns
> Portofino 3.1.10 OpenLaszlo 4.1 OpenXava 4.0.1 Oracle ADF 11.1.1.4
> Play 1.1.1 RIFE 1.6.2 Shale 1.0.4 Sling 5 SmartClient 8 Spring
> 3.0.5 Stripes 1.5.4 Telosys 1.1.1 ThinWire 1.2 Vaadin(IT Mill
> Toolkit) 6.5.1 Wavemaker 6.1.10 WebObjects 5.4.3 WebWork 2.2.6
> ZK 5.0.5 ztemplates 0.9.9.6
>
> The powers that be decided to pick Smart Client over Apache Wicket because
> they have the highest version number.
>
> So, I think the time is right to move straight to the front of the pack and
> release version 10.0.
>
> Who's with me?
>
> -- Jim
>
> Spinal Tap Industries, Inc.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org