You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by "Adam Lally (JIRA)" <ui...@incubator.apache.org> on 2007/06/05 19:35:26 UTC
[jira] Commented: (UIMA-400) Fix Eclipse plugin
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12501624 ]
Adam Lally commented on UIMA-400:
---------------------------------
I fixed all these issued except for the fact that we have both Export-Package and Provide-Package. Personally I think it is fine to drop Eclipse 3.0 support at this time, by deleting Provide-Package. Objections?
> Fix Eclipse plugin
> ------------------
>
> Key: UIMA-400
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-400
> Project: UIMA
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Eclipse plugins
> Affects Versions: 2.1
> Reporter: Mikhail Sogrin
> Assignee: Adam Lally
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.2
>
>
> Manifest for org.apache.uima.runtime plugin in UIMA 2.1 release is not correct:
> - lib/uima-jcas-builtin-types.jar is listed in manifest, but not present in plugin.
> - uima-document-annotation.jar is in distribution, but not in plugin.
> - Exported packages are listed twice, with Export-Package and with Provide-Package. But Provide-Package has been deprecated since Eclipse 3.1.
> - Exported package org.apache.uima.tttypesystem does not exist in plugin, was removed in UIMA-64.
> - "Eclipse-BuddyPolicy: registered" is written twice.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: [jira] Commented: (UIMA-400) Fix Eclipse plugin
Posted by Thilo Goetz <tw...@gmx.de>.
Marshall Schor wrote:
> +1 to dropping Eclipse 3.0 support, based on time, and the fact that
> it's quite easy to upgrade to new versions of Eclipse. I hope I'm not
> wrong... but the users will speak I guess.
>
> -Marshall
>
I'm +1 to dropping 3.0 support as well. I'd just mention that some
people don't use plain Eclipse, but some tools built on Eclipse. They
often don't have the luxury of upgrading their underlying Eclipse
version. However, I hope that even for those folks, Eclipse 3.0
is history.
--Thilo
Re: [jira] Commented: (UIMA-400) Fix Eclipse plugin
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
+1 to dropping Eclipse 3.0 support, based on time, and the fact that
it's quite easy to upgrade to new versions of Eclipse. I hope I'm not
wrong... but the users will speak I guess.
-Marshall
Adam Lally (JIRA) wrote:
> [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12501624 ]
>
> Adam Lally commented on UIMA-400:
> ---------------------------------
>
> I fixed all these issued except for the fact that we have both Export-Package and Provide-Package. Personally I think it is fine to drop Eclipse 3.0 support at this time, by deleting Provide-Package. Objections?
>
>
>> Fix Eclipse plugin
>> ------------------
>>
>> Key: UIMA-400
>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-400
>> Project: UIMA
>> Issue Type: Bug
>> Components: Eclipse plugins
>> Affects Versions: 2.1
>> Reporter: Mikhail Sogrin
>> Assignee: Adam Lally
>> Priority: Minor
>> Fix For: 2.2
>>
>>
>> Manifest for org.apache.uima.runtime plugin in UIMA 2.1 release is not correct:
>> - lib/uima-jcas-builtin-types.jar is listed in manifest, but not present in plugin.
>> - uima-document-annotation.jar is in distribution, but not in plugin.
>> - Exported packages are listed twice, with Export-Package and with Provide-Package. But Provide-Package has been deprecated since Eclipse 3.1.
>> - Exported package org.apache.uima.tttypesystem does not exist in plugin, was removed in UIMA-64.
>> - "Eclipse-BuddyPolicy: registered" is written twice.
>>
>
>