You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by "Richard Eckart de Castilho (Jira)" <de...@uima.apache.org> on 2022/05/09 20:31:00 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (UIMA-6446) Complexities around enhancing classes with their resource name

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Richard Eckart de Castilho resolved UIMA-6446.
----------------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 3.3.0uimaFIT
       Resolution: Fixed

> Complexities around enhancing classes with their resource name
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: UIMA-6446
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6446
>             Project: UIMA
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: uimaFIT, uimaFIT-Maven-Plugin
>            Reporter: Richard Eckart de Castilho
>            Assignee: Richard Eckart de Castilho
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.3.0uimaFIT
>
>
> The uimaFIT Maven Plugin contains a mojo called {{enhance}}. This mojo adds a {{ResourceMetaData}} annotation to every class that does not already have one.
> In that case, it also sets the {{name}} field using the resource class name.
> Now consider the following scenario:
> * component class {{Child}} inherits from (abstract) component class {{Parent}}
> * for some reason, the class {{Parent}} has been enhanced and therefore carries an auto-generated {{ResourceMetaData("Parent")}} annotation
> * for some reason, the class {{Child}} has not been enhanced and also does not carry a {{ResourceMetaData}} annotation
> When generating a descriptor for the component now, e.g. using {{createEngineDescription(Child.class}}, the name of the resulting component will be {{Parent}}.
> It would seem the approach to solve this problem is to only consider the {{ResourceMetaData.name}} field when it is defined directly on a component. However, for the other fields like {{copyright, description, vendor, version}} it would likewise seem problematic to look them up in parent classes. In many cases, the parent and the child will be in the same project - but in many other cases, they may also not be.
> It would seem the bug is not in the uimaFIT Maven Plugin for generating the {{ResourceMetaData}} annotation (even on abstract classes), but rather in {{createEngineDescription}}-and-friends for looking in superclasses for  {{ResourceMetaData}} annotations.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)