You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by kf...@collab.net on 2004/02/04 18:25:59 UTC

Re: [Issue 1540] cvs2svn fails to handle some branches

Whoo-hoo!  Nice one, Mike.  (Sorry I didn't see the 'dead' state on
the RCS file either when we were looking at it yesterday.)

Yah, we could record the delete/re-add/re-delete sequence as an
optimization issue, but definitely in 'cvs2svn-opt', not 'cvs2svn-1.0'.

-K

cmpilato@tigris.org writes:
> ------- Additional comments from cmpilato@tigris.org Tue Feb  3 22:10:28 -0800 2004 -------
> Oh, geez.  I was making a big fuss because in the split-branch-repos, we see the
> path /branches/demo-node-0/module/branched-from-trunk get deleted (because the
> wrong version was created when /branches/demo-node-0 was copied from /trunk),
> then re-added as a copy from the right revision, and then re-deleted.  But
> *duh*, the file is in state 'dead' on that branch, so its final Subversion repos
> state *should* be deleted.  If I tweak the repos so that the state is 'Exp', I
> don't get that re-deletion.
> 
> So, this bug is finished, folks.  Yes, there's something a little inefficient in
> this case about doing delete, re-add, re-delete, but that's a different issue
> (and an optimization only, at that).
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@subversion.tigris.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: [Issue 1540] cvs2svn fails to handle some branches

Posted by kf...@collab.net.
"C. Michael Pilato" <cm...@collab.net> writes:
> > Yah, we could record the delete/re-add/re-delete sequence as an
> > optimization issue, but definitely in 'cvs2svn-opt', not
> > 'cvs2svn-1.0'.
> 
> Please do.

Done.  If you get a chance, please check over new issue #1732 for
factual correctness.

Btw, I'm working on a regression test for #1427 right now.

-K

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: [Issue 1540] cvs2svn fails to handle some branches

Posted by "C. Michael Pilato" <cm...@collab.net>.
kfogel@collab.net writes:

> Whoo-hoo!  Nice one, Mike.  (Sorry I didn't see the 'dead' state on
> the RCS file either when we were looking at it yesterday.)

The sad thing is that I *did* notice it earlier, but that was before
I'd solidified the fix for the issue.  By the time the latter
occurred, the former was a distant (non-)memory.  :-(

> Yah, we could record the delete/re-add/re-delete sequence as an
> optimization issue, but definitely in 'cvs2svn-opt', not
> 'cvs2svn-1.0'.

Please do.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org