You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@tvm.apache.org by driazati <no...@github.com.INVALID> on 2022/05/09 18:15:23 UTC

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Quarterly Releases (PR #67)

I agree with @areusch that a lot changes pre and post 1.0. This RFC's main focus is getting code out the door often, so with that I think it makes the most sense to only support the current version and only publish a new release mid-cycle for critical bug fixes and security issues.

Ostensibly the release manager should be responsible for the release they published (and in the best case this would mean a release needs no patches and thus requires no extra work), but this could get passed off or reassigned as we move along based on who's available.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/67#issuecomment-1121422799
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <ap...@github.com>